journal article·2026-02-23

A programmable UAV-based measurement system for wind turbine surface defect detection: the WB-YOLO method

Mengyao Feng, Yiyang Xu, Wei Dai, Tianpeng He, Yuanming Xu

Publisher page

Abstract

Wind turbine surface defect detection is critical for ensuring operational safety and efficient maintenance of wind energy systems. Although unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based inspection offers a promising alternative to manual methods, it faces challenges such as environmental interference and poor recognition of small-scale defects. To address these issues, this paper proposes WB-YOLO, an efficient detection model based on an improved YOLO architecture. An additional P2 detection head is introduced to enhance small-target feature representation, and an Inner-SIoU loss function is adopted to improve bounding box regression accuracy. The model is integrated into a programmable UAV-based vision measurement system with a metamaterial-inspired structural design, forming a flexible and low-cost inspection platform. Experiments on a self-constructed wind turbine surface defect dataset demonstrate that WB-YOLO outperforms representative YOLO- and DETR-based methods, achieving improvements of 1.9% in Precision, 2.5% in Recall, 2.1% in mAP@50, and 2.3% in mAP@50–95, while maintaining an inference time of 3.2 ms (312 FPS). Validation in simulated wind farm environments further confirms stable detection performance under challenging lighting conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Icing and De-icing Technologies · Wind Energy Research and Development · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beihang, University Beijing

Beijing University of Technology

Beihang University

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s43979-022-00010-y10.1007/s43979-022-00010-y ↗
2. 10.1002/ghg.223510.1002/ghg.2235 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.20010.1016/j.rser.2015.07.200 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10098-022-02314-010.1007/s10098-022-02314-0 ↗
5. 10.3390/en1417524110.3390/en14175241 ↗
6. 10.3390/su1510833310.3390/su15108333 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.00510.1016/j.rser.2014.12.005 ↗
8. 10.3390/s2204162710.3390/s22041627 ↗
9. 10.1007/s40313-021-00789-810.1007/s40313-021-00789-8 ↗
10. 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.356979910.1109/ACCESS.2025.3569799 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2024.239536310.1080/10589759.2024.2395363 ↗
12. 10.1063/5.025213010.1063/5.0252130 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.10335910.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103359 ↗
14. 10.5194/wes-2025-23710.5194/wes-2025-237 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.procs.2025.03.05510.1016/j.procs.2025.03.055 ↗
16. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2012;25:3113–3121.
17. 10.3390/electronics1402022710.3390/electronics14020227 ↗
18. 10.48550/arXiv.1804.0276710.48550/arXiv.1804.02767 ↗
19. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.16910.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
20. 10.48550/arXiv.2010.0415910.48550/arXiv.2010.04159 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11322210.1016/j.measurement.2023.113222 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.aei.2023.10229210.1016/j.aei.2023.102292 ↗
23. 10.3390/su1611446710.3390/su16114467 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10890810.1016/j.engappai.2024.108908 ↗
25. 10.1109/JSEN.2024.343035110.1109/JSEN.2024.3430351 ↗
26. 10.1002/adts.20210063110.1002/adts.202100631 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.10961510.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109615 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10997010.1016/j.engappai.2024.109970 ↗
29. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.325782410.1109/JSEN.2023.3257824 ↗
30. 10.1109/JSEN.2022.322483710.1109/JSEN.2022.3224837 ↗
31. 10.1109/LSENS.2022.318452110.1109/LSENS.2022.3184521 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.asoc.2025.11326010.1016/j.asoc.2025.113260 ↗
33. 10.1371/journal.pone.033421610.1371/journal.pone.0334216 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.11311710.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113117 ↗
35. 10.1109/TSMC.2024.338906810.1109/TSMC.2024.3389068 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11497010.1016/j.measurement.2024.114970 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ast.2025.11089710.1016/j.ast.2025.110897 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11747010.1016/j.measurement.2025.117470 ↗
39. 10.1007/s43069-024-00337-510.1007/s43069-024-00337-5 ↗
40. 10.1007/s13369-023-08483-410.1007/s13369-023-08483-4 ↗
41. 10.32604/cmc.2024.05258210.32604/cmc.2024.052582 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.cma.2025.11835510.1016/j.cma.2025.118355 ↗
43. 10.3390/e2703027710.3390/e27030277 ↗
44. 10.1177/1077546325139947910.1177/10775463251399479 ↗
45. 10.48550/arXiv.2311.0287710.48550/arXiv.2311.02877 ↗
46. 10.3390/futuretransp503012010.3390/futuretransp5030120 ↗
47. 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.0160510.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01605 ↗
48. 10.1109/RAIT65068.2025.1108921410.1109/RAIT65068.2025.11089214 ↗
49. 10.3390/horticulturae1111138010.3390/horticulturae11111380 ↗
50. 10.1186/s40537-024-00941-610.1186/s40537-024-00941-6 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10413210.1016/j.aei.2025.104132 ↗
52. 10.1109/TIM.2025.364308510.1109/TIM.2025.3643085 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11878410.1016/j.measurement.2025.118784 ↗
54. 10.1109/TII.2025.355599010.1109/TII.2025.3555990 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.isci.2024.11161810.1016/j.isci.2024.111618 ↗