journal article·2025-01-02

Analysing suspected linear indications in narrow-gap welding of nuclear power plants via radiographic inspection

Deng Dong, Guo Yanhui, Wang Yan, Zhang Yue

Publisher page

Abstract

In nuclear power plants, ensuring the integrity of main coolant line welding is vital. Radiographic testing often shows linear indications in these welds, posing challenges for quality assessment and requiring expensive reworking. To investigate the mechanism of the suspected linear indications observed in radiographic inspections of narrow-gap welding at nuclear power plants, the microstructure, microhardness, and porosity of welds showing such indications were investigated in this study using scanning electron microscopy and atomic probing methods, among others. The microvoid distribution in narrow-gap welds was characterised by porosity measurement. The results showed that the microstructure of the weld consists of an austenite matrix and δ-ferrite, with the latter distributed almost uniformly during welding. The average δ-ferrite content and microhardness were approximately 6.6% and 186 HV0.49N, respectively. The porosity of the welding zone with a suspected linear indication was approximately 0.06%, higher than the 0.03% observed in the zones without such indications. This difference is likely responsible for the linear indications detected in radiographic inspections. However, the results demonstrated that this difference does not affect the welding microhardness. The novelty of this study lies in explaining the role of porosity in causing suspected linear indications in narrow-gap welding in nuclear power plants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nuclear equipmen supervise, Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Beijing, China

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.06710.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.067 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.06210.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.062 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2021.199028310.1080/10589759.2021.1990283 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.12.00410.1016/j.jmapro.2016.12.004 ↗
5. 10.1115/PVP2009-7807710.1115/PVP2009-78077 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.01710.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.017 ↗
7. Li HT. Analysis of the liner display of the main pipe in AP1000. Weld Technol. 2014;43(008):66–68.
8. Yang B, Deng Q, Chen C, et al. Evaluation and analysis of RT suspected defects on reactor pressure boundary weld. Beijing: 2020 Asia Conference on Geological Research and Environmental Technology; 2020.
9. 10.1177/1369433223121346210.1177/13694332231213462 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.00910.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.009 ↗
11. 10.1007/s11661-023-07136-310.1007/s11661-023-07136-3 ↗
12. Carter JLW Nunes AC Clounch JL et al. Study of radiographic linear indications and subsequent microstructural features in gas tungsten arc welds of Inconel 718. 2007.
13. Lippold JC. Solidification of austenitic stainless steel weldments. Weld J. 1979;58:362–374.
14. Bryant LE. Nondestructive testing handbook. Columbus, Ohio :: American Society for Metals; 1985.
15. 10.1007/BF0265232810.1007/BF02652328 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1308140210.3390/met13081402 ↗