journal article·2020-01-02

Condition monitoring with defect localisation in a two-dimensional structure based on linear discriminant and nearest neighbour classification of strain features

R. Janeliukstis, S. Rucevskis, A. Chate

Publisher page

Abstract

A method for condition monitoring and localization of defects in mass-produced structural members using supervised learning is presented. An example for the effectiveness of the developed method comprises cantilevered carbon composite plate. In a numerical finite element model, the plate is partitioned into zones and a point mass is put on several locations within each zone. Point mass is treated as a pseudo-defect locally modifying structural properties of the plate. For each act of mass application, strain values are recorded and serve as defect-sensitive feature. Two variables of classification are tested – two different supervised learning algorithms (linear discriminant and non-linear k-nearest neighbours) and a limited number of strain data points per class which is varied in the range of 2 to 9 points. Several query points are simulated and subjected to classification in terms of belonging to particular zones of the partitioned plate. This step can be treated as a defect localization. It is shown that only 2 strain readings per class are sufficient for defect localization. The methodology is experimentally validated on a cantilevered carbon composite prepreg of the same dimensions and properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Optical measurement and interference techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Materials and Structures, faculty of Civil Engineering, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2012.69488610.1080/10589759.2012.694886 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2015.113082810.1080/10589759.2015.1130828 ↗
3. 10.1080/1058975050020963810.1080/10589750500209638 ↗
4. 10.1080/1058975940895641510.1080/10589759408956415 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.04710.1016/j.renene.2018.10.047 ↗
6. Tan PN · 2006
7. 10.1016/j.csda.2018.04.00510.1016/j.csda.2018.04.005 ↗
8. 10.1177/1045389X0708471310.1177/1045389X07084713 ↗
9. 10.2514/1.3728210.2514/1.37282 ↗
10. 10.1177/002199831667972010.1177/0021998316679720 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.01910.1016/j.engfailanal.2017.11.019 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.00910.1016/j.jsv.2010.02.009 ↗
13. de Lautour OR · Struct Control Health Monit · 2010 · 17 · 614
14. 10.1177/105678950809661410.1177/1056789508096614 ↗
15. 10.1002/stc.217010.1002/stc.2170 ↗
16. 10.3390/s1702041710.3390/s17020417 ↗
17. 10.3390/s1706125210.3390/s17061252 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.06.08710.1016/j.ijleo.2013.06.087 ↗
19. 10.1177/147592171351728810.1177/1475921713517288 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.04.02010.1016/j.ultras.2013.04.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.052 ↗
22. 10.3390/en1101001310.3390/en11010013 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.05.01110.1016/j.compstruc.2014.05.011 ↗
25. 10.1002/stc.154010.1002/stc.1540 ↗
26. 10.1002/stc.226210.1002/stc.2262 ↗
27. 10.1002/stc.213510.1002/stc.2135 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.01710.1016/j.ymssp.2015.01.017 ↗
29. Tibaduiza DA · 2011 · 8
30. 10.1002/stc.193010.1002/stc.1930 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11029-018-9698-810.1007/s11029-018-9698-8 ↗
32. 10.1080/10589759.2013.80147210.1080/10589759.2013.801472 ↗
33. 10.1002/stc.218110.1002/stc.2181 ↗
34. Manning CD · 2009
35. 10.1002/stc.199810.1002/stc.1998 ↗
36. Witten IH · 2011
37. Rokach L · 2015
38. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.10.00610.1016/j.compstruc.2014.10.006 ↗