Fault detection network for X-ray imaging steel cord conveyor belt based on improved YOLOv11
Source abstract
Abstract
Steel cord conveyor belts are widely used in coal, harbor, and power industries, but harsh environments and high workloads make internal steel cords prone to faults. Undetected faults may lead to serious incidents like belt breakage or longitudinal tearing, threatening production safety. To improve the low accuracy and poor real-time performance of existing methods, this paper proposes WU-YOLO, a fault detection network based on an improved YOLOv11 for X-ray imaging of steel cord conveyor belts. The WTConv module is embedded into the C3k2 structure of the feature fusion module to achieve a near-global receptive field with lightweight parameters, enabling effective capture of local and global features. A P2 detection layer is added to fuse shallow and deep features, improving small target detection. Furthermore, the Unified-IoU loss function is introduced to enhance localization accuracy. The proposed model achieves a balance between speed and accuracy. Experimental results show that WU-YOLO reaches a mAP@0.5 of 99.1% on the self-made X-ray image dataset and 52.5% on the public dataset with similar textures. The detection time is 6.1 ms, demonstrating the model’s capability for real-time, high-accuracy fault detection in steel cord conveyor belts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering · Power Line Inspection Robots · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tiangong University
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Detection Technology and System
Cangzhou Institute of Tiangong University
Shandong New Dragon Energy Co., Ltd
Funding
Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project · Cangzhou Institute of Tiangong University
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/01694243.2020.171277110.1080/01694243.2020.1712771 ↗
2. 10.1109/TIM.2021.306902510.1109/TIM.2021.3069025 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10913010.1016/j.measurement.2021.109130 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2024.244510610.1080/10589759.2024.2445106 ↗
5. Harrison A. New technique for measuring loss of adhesion in conveyor-belt splices. Aust J Coal Min Technol Res. 1983;4:27–34.
6. Ren K. Research on the magnetic flux leakage distribution law and quantitative evaluation of creep in wire rope core conveyor belt joints in coal mines. (Xi’an University of Science and Technology). 2018.
7. 10.13436/j.mkjx.20200105210.13436/j.mkjx.202001052 ↗
8. 10.16816/j.cnki.ksjx.2022.06.00510.16816/j.cnki.ksjx.2022.06.005 ↗
9. 10.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.202202003710.13272/j.issn.1671-251x.2022020037 ↗
10. Guo K. Research on the steel cord conveyor belt joint fault detection algorithm based on image matching (Tiangong University). 2022.
11. 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2012.07.02510.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2012.07.025 ↗
12. Xie J, Ren W. Detection system of steel cord conveyor belt in coal mines. Ind Mine Automation. 2021;47:69–71.
13. Li Y. Detection technology of steel cord conveyor belt in intelligent transportation of coal mines. Ind Mine Automation. 2023;49:18–19+80.
14. Liu P. Research on defect intelligent recognition technology in X-ray inspection.North University of China. 2008
15. 10.2478/ijssis-2025-000310.2478/ijssis-2025-0003 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242194110.1080/10589759.2024.2421941 ↗
17. 10.12783/dtcse/icaic2019/2942810.12783/dtcse/icaic2019/29428 ↗
18. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12204-023-2651-610.1007/s12204-023-2651-6 ↗
20. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.0097210.1109/ICCV.2019.00972 ↗
21. Dong L, Lei W, Li R, et al. The damage detection method of mining steel cord core conveyor belt based on improved YOLOv5. Shanxi Coking Coal Sci Technol. 2023;47:15–17.
22. Tang J, Zhao T, Tian K, et al. Research on intelligent non-destructive detection monitoring system of mining steel cord core conveyor belt. Coal Eng. 2023;55:198–202.
23. 10.19769/j.zdhy.2024.07.00610.19769/j.zdhy.2024.07.006 ↗
24. 10.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2024.00076410.27206/d.cnki.ggsgu.2024.000764 ↗
25. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9110.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
26. 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.238982410.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 ↗
27. 10.48550/arXiv.2407.0584810.48550/arXiv.2407.05848 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.00310.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.003 ↗
29. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245176810.1080/10589759.2025.2451768 ↗
30. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0091310.1109/CVPR.2018.00913 ↗
31. 10.1109/TCYB.2021.309530510.1109/TCYB.2021.3095305 ↗
32. 10.48550/arXiv.2408.0663610.48550/arXiv.2408.06636 ↗
33. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.32410.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗