Isotropy-conditioned density mapping for lattice design using topology optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Homogenization-based topology optimization methods used for designing graded lattice structures require multiple scaling laws because of the anisotropic elastic properties of cubic lattice cells. In this study, an isotropy-conditioned density mapping (ICDM) approach is presented to define lattice cells with isotropic elastic properties across the full range of relative densities, enabling the use of a single scaling law in density-based topology optimization. Strut radii for different groups within a cubic lattice cell are determined to satisfy an isotropy condition by evaluating homogenized elastic properties over the entire relative density range required for topology optimization. The resulting isotropy-conditioned lattice cells are used for density mapping in topology optimization based on the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method. The proposed approach is computationally efficient because it enables macroscopic optimization using the standard SIMP method while ensuring that spatially varying mesoscale lattice configurations satisfy isotropy using a single scaling law. The method is demonstrated through two three-dimensional numerical examples to show its efficacy. The improved structural performance of the optimized designs with the isotropy-conditioned lattice cells is shown by comparing their results with the existing designs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Aage, N., Andreassen, E., Lazarov, B.S., Sigmund, O.: Giga-voxel computational morphogenesis for structural design. Nature 550, 84–86 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2391110.1038/nature23911 ↗
2. Alzahrani, M., Choi, S.K., Rosen, D.W.: Design of truss-like cellular structures using relative density mapping method. Mater. Des. 85, 349–360 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.18010.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.180 ↗
3. Ayas, C., Tekoglu, C.: On the sufficient symmetry conditions for isotropy of elastic moduli. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME (2018). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403995210.1115/1.4039952 ↗
4. Bendsøe, M.P., Kikuchi, N.: Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197–224 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-210.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
5. Bendsøe, M.P., Sigmund, O.: Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Arch. Appl. Mech. 69, 635–654 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419005024810.1007/s004190050248 ↗
6. Berger, J.B., Wadley, H.N.G., McMeeking, R.M.: Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness. Nature (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature2107510.1038/nature21075 ↗
7. Challis, V.J., Roberts, A.P., Grotowski, J.F., Zhang, L.C., Sercombe, T.B.: Prototypes for bone implant scaffolds designed via topology optimization and manufactured by solid freeform fabrication. Adv. Eng. Mater. 12, 1106–1110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20100015410.1002/adem.201000154 ↗
8. Challis, V.J., Roberts, A.P., Wilkins, A.H.: Design of three dimensional isotropic microstructures for maximized stiffness and conductivity. Int. J. Solids Struct. 45, 4130–4146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.02.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.02.025 ↗
9. Cheng, L., Bai, J., To, A.C.: Functionally graded lattice structure topology optimization for the design of additive manufactured components with stress constraints. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 344, 334–359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.10.01010.1016/j.cma.2018.10.010 ↗
10. Cheng, L., Liang, X., Belski, E., Wang, X., Sietins, J.M., Ludwick, S., To, A.: Natural frequency optimization of variable-density additive manufactured lattice structure: theory and experimental validation. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME 140, 105002 (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404062210.1115/1.4040622 ↗
11. Cheng, L., Liu, J., Liang, X., To, A.C.: Coupling lattice structure topology optimization with design-dependent feature evolution for additive manufactured heat conduction design. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 332, 408–439 (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.02410.1016/j.cma.2017.12.024 ↗
12. Cheng, L., Liu, J., To, A.C.: Concurrent lattice infill with feature evolution optimization for additive manufactured heat conduction design. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 58, 511–535 (2018c). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1905-710.1007/s00158-018-1905-7 ↗
13. Cheng, L., Zhang, P., Biyikli, E., Bai, J., Robbins, J., To, A.: Efficient design optimization of variable-density cellular structures for additive manufacturing: theory and experimental validation. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23, 660–677 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2016-006910.1108/RPJ-04-2016-0069 ↗
14. Da, D., Yvonnet, J., Xia, L., Le, M.V., Li, G.: Topology optimization of periodic lattice structures taking into account strain gradient. Comput Struct. 210, 28–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2018.09.00310.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2018.09.003 ↗
15. Da, D.: Inverse homogenization design of lattice structures without scale separation. Structures 29, 796–805 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2020.11.02310.1016/J.ISTRUC.2020.11.023 ↗
16. Daynes, S., Feih, S., Lu, W.F., Wei, J.: Optimisation of functionally graded lattice structures using isostatic lines. Mater. Des. 127, 215–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.08210.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.082 ↗
17. Deshpande, V.S., Fleck, N.A., Ashby, M.F.: Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 49, 1747–1769 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-210.1016/S0022-5096(01)00010-2 ↗
18. Dong, G., Tang, Y., Zhao, Y.F.: A survey of modeling of lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403730510.1115/1.4037305 ↗
19. Duan, S., Wen, W., Fang, D.: Additively-manufactured anisotropic and isotropic 3D plate-lattice materials for enhanced mechanical performance: simulations & experiments. Acta Mater. 199, 397–412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.06310.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.063 ↗
20. Gorguluarslan, R.M., Gandhi, U.N., Mandapati, R., Choi, S.K.: Design and fabrication of periodic lattice-based cellular structures. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 13, 50–62 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2015.105919410.1080/16864360.2015.1059194 ↗
21. Gorguluarslan, R.M., Gandhi, U.N., Song, Y., Choi, S.K.: An improved lattice structure design optimization framework considering additive manufacturing constraints. Rapid Prototyp. J. 23, 305–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2015-013910.1108/RPJ-10-2015-0139 ↗
22. Gurtner, G., Durand, M.: Stiffest elastic networks. Proc. R Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.061110.1098/rspa.2013.0611 ↗
23. Hemp, W.S.: Theory of structural design. College of Aeronautics Report. (1958)
24. Hemp, W.S., Chan, H.S.Y.: Optimum structures. (1965)
25. Hollister, S.J., Kikuchi, N.: A comparison of homogenization and standard mechanics analyses for periodic porous composites. Comput. Mech. 10, 73–95 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0036985310.1007/BF00369853 ↗
26. Imediegwu, C., Murphy, R., Hewson, R., Santer, M.: Multiscale structural optimization towards three-dimensional printable structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 60, 513–525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02220-y10.1007/s00158-019-02220-y ↗
27. Jansen, M., Pierard, O.: A hybrid density/level set formulation for topology optimization of functionally graded lattice structures. Comput. Struct. 231, 106205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.10620510.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106205 ↗
28. Jin, X., Li, G.X., Zhang, M.: Design and optimization of nonuniform cellular structures. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 232, 1280–1293 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621770467710.1177/0954406217704677 ↗
29. Khanoki, S.A., Pasini, D.: Multiscale design and multiobjective optimization of orthopedic hip implants with functionally graded cellular material. J. Biomech. Eng. 134, 031004 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.400611510.1115/1.4006115 ↗
30. Larsen, S.D., Sigmund, O., Groen, J.P.: Optimal truss and frame design from projected homogenization-based topology optimization. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57, 1461–1474 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1948-910.1007/s00158-018-1948-9 ↗
31. Lee, Y.H., Chung, C.J., Wang, C.W., Peng, Y.T., Chang, C.H., Chen, C.H., Chen, Y.N., Li, C.T.: Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity. Comput. Biol. Med. 71, 35–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.01.02410.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.01.024 ↗
32. Li, D., Dai, N., Tang, Y., Dong, G., Zhao, Y.F.: Design and optimization of graded cellular structures with triply periodic level surface-based topological shapes. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 141, 071402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404261710.1115/1.4042617 ↗
33. Li, D., Liao, W., Dai, N., Dong, G., Tang, Y., Xie, Y.M.: Optimal design and modeling of gyroid-based functionally graded cellular structures for additive manufacturing. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 104, 87–99 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2018.06.00310.1016/j.cad.2018.06.003 ↗
34. Liu, B., Cao, W., Zhang, L., Jiang, K., Lu, P.: A design method of Voronoi porous structures with graded relative elasticity distribution for functionally gradient porous materials. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-021-09558-610.1007/s10999-021-09558-6 ↗
35. Liu, H., Hu, Y., Zhu, B., Matusik, W., Sifakis, E.: Narrow-band topology optimization on a sparsely populated grid. ACM Trans Graph. 37, 251 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3272127.327501210.1145/3272127.3275012 ↗
36. Liu, K., Tovar, A.: An efficient 3D topology optimization code written in Matlab. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1107-x10.1007/s00158-014-1107-x ↗
37. Liu, L., Yan, J., Cheng, G.: Optimum structure with homogeneous optimum truss-like material. Comput. Struct. 86, 1417–1425 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.03010.1016/j.compstruc.2007.04.030 ↗
38. Liu, X., Shapiro, V.: Sample-based synthesis of two-scale structures with anisotropy. CAD Computer Aided Design. 90, 199–209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2017.05.01310.1016/j.cad.2017.05.013 ↗
39. Liu, Y., Zhuo, S., Xiao, Y., Zheng, G., Dong, G., Zhao, Y.F.: Rapid modeling and design optimization of multi-Topology lattice structure based on unit-Cell library. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME. 142, 091705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404681210.1115/1.4046812 ↗
40. Lohmuller, P., Favre, J., Kenzari, S., Piotrowski, B., Peltier, L., Laheurte, P.: Architectural effect on 3D elastic properties and anisotropy of cubic lattice structures. Mater Des (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10805910.1016/j.matdes.2019.108059 ↗
41. Lynch, M.E., Mordasky, M., Cheng, L., To, A.: Design, testing, and mechanical behavior of additively manufactured casing with optimized lattice structure. Addit. Manuf. 22, 462–471 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.02110.1016/j.addma.2018.05.021 ↗
42. Messner, M.C.: Optimal lattice-structured materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 96, 162–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.01010.1016/j.jmps.2016.07.010 ↗
43. Meyers, M.A., Chawla, K.K.: Mechanical Behavior of Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
44. Michell, A.G.M.: LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 8, 589–597 (1904). https://doi.org/10.1080/1478644040946322910.1080/14786440409463229 ↗
45. Moussa, A., Rahman, S., Xu, M., Tanzer, M., Pasini, D.: Topology optimization of 3D-printed structurally porous cage for acetabular reinforcement in total hip arthroplasty. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10370510.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103705 ↗
46. Moussa, A., Tanzer, M., Pasini, D.: Cervical fusion cage computationally optimized with porous architected Titanium for minimized subsidence. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.04010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.05.040 ↗
47. Nguyen, C.H.P., Choi, Y.: Concurrent density distribution and build orientation optimization of additively manufactured functionally graded lattice structures. CAD Comput. Aided Des. 127, 102884 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.10288410.1016/j.cad.2020.102884 ↗
48. Nguyen, C.H.P., Kim, Y., Choi, Y.: Design for additive manufacturing of functionally graded lattice structures: a design method with process induced anisotropy consideration. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Gr. Technol. 8, 29–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00173-710.1007/s40684-019-00173-7 ↗
49. Norris, A.N.: Mechanics of elastic networks. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2014.052210.1098/rspa.2014.0522 ↗
50. Omairey, S.L., Dunning, P.D., Sriramula, S.: Development of an ABAQUS plugin tool for periodic RVE homogenisation. Eng. Comput. 35, 567–577 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-018-0616-410.1007/s00366-018-0616-4 ↗
51. Panesar, A., Abdi, M., Hickman, D., Ashcroft, I.: Strategies for functionally graded lattice structures derived using topology optimisation for additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 19, 81–94 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.11.00810.1016/j.addma.2017.11.008 ↗
52. Rahimizadeh, A., Nourmohammadi, Z., Arabnejad, S., Tanzer, M., Pasini, D.: Porous architected biomaterial for a tibial-knee implant with minimum bone resorption and bone-implant interface micromotion. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.04110.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.041 ↗
53. Ranganathan, S.I., Ostoja-Starzewski, M.: Universal elastic anisotropy index. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.05550410.1103/PhysRevLett.101.055504 ↗
54. Schaedler, T.A., Carter, W.B.: Architected cellular materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 46, 187–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-03162410.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031624 ↗
55. Syam, W.P., Jianwei, W., Zhao, B., Maskery, I., Elmadih, W., Leach, R.: Design and analysis of strut-based lattice structures for vibration isolation. Precis. Eng. 52, 494–506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.09.01010.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.09.010 ↗
56. Tancogne-Dejean, T., Diamantopoulou, M., Gorji, M.B., Bonatti, C., Mohr, D.: 3D plate-lattices: an emerging class of low-density metamaterial exhibiting optimal isotropic stiffness. Adv. Mater. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180333410.1002/adma.201803334 ↗
57. Tancogne-Dejean, T., Mohr, D.: Elastically-isotropic truss lattice materials of reduced plastic anisotropy. Int. J. Solids Struct. 138, 24–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.12.025 ↗
58. Tang, Y., Zhao, Y.F.: Multifunctional design of heterogeneous cellular structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 58, 1121–1138 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1956-910.1007/s00158-018-1956-9 ↗
59. Vantyghem, G., De Corte, W., Steeman, M., Boel, V.: Density-based topology optimization for 3D-printable building structures. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 60, 2391–2403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02330-710.1007/s00158-019-02330-7 ↗
60. Vlădulescu, F., Constantinescu, D.M.: Lattice structure optimization and homogenization through finite element analyses. Proc. Instit. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/146442072094574410.1177/1464420720945744 ↗
61. Wang, C., Gu, X., Zhu, J., Zhou, H., Li, S., Zhang, W.: Concurrent design of hierarchical structures with three-dimensional parameterized lattice microstructures for additive manufacturing. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 61, 869–894 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02408-210.1007/s00158-019-02408-2 ↗
62. Wang, C., Zhu, J.H., Zhang, W.H., Li, S.Y., Kong, J.: Concurrent topology optimization design of structures and non-uniform parameterized lattice microstructures. Struct. Multidiscip Optim. 58, 35–50 (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2009-010.1007/s00158-018-2009-0 ↗
63. Wang, X., Zhang, P., Ludwick, S., Belski, E., To, A.C.: Natural frequency optimization of 3D printed variable-density honeycomb structure via a homogenization-based approach. Addit. Manuf. (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.00110.1016/j.addma.2017.10.001 ↗
64. Wang, Y., Wang, M.Y., Chen, F.: Structure-material integrated design by level sets. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1430-510.1007/s00158-016-1430-5 ↗
65. Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Daynes, S., Zhang, H., Feih, S., Wang, M.Y.: Design of graded lattice structure with optimized mesostructures for additive manufacturing. Mater. Des. (2018c). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.01110.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.011 ↗
66. Watts, S., Tortorelli, D.A.: A geometric projection method for designing three-dimensional open lattices with inverse homogenization. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 112, 1564–1588 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.556910.1002/nme.5569 ↗
67. White, D.A., Arrighi, W.J., Kudo, J., Watts, S.E.: Multiscale topology optimization using neural network surrogate models. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 346, 1118–1135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.00710.1016/j.cma.2018.09.007 ↗
68. Wu, J., Dick, C., Westermann, R.: A system for high-resolution topology optimization. IEEE Trans. vis. Comput. Graph. 22, 1195–1208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.250258810.1109/TVCG.2015.2502588 ↗
69. Wu, Z., Xia, L., Wang, S., Shi, T.: Topology optimization of hierarchical lattice structures with substructuring. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 345, 602–617 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.00310.1016/j.cma.2018.11.003 ↗
70. Xia, Z., Zhang, Y., Ellyin, F.: A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 1907–1921 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-610.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-6 ↗
71. Xu, S., Shen, J., Zhou, S., Huang, X., Xie, Y.M.: Design of lattice structures with controlled anisotropy. Mater. des. 93, 443–447 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.00710.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.007 ↗
72. Yan, X., Huang, X., Zha, Y., Xie, Y.M.: Concurrent topology optimization of structures and their composite microstructures. Comput. Struct. 133, 103–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.12.00110.1016/j.compstruc.2013.12.001 ↗
73. Zener, C.M., Siegel, S.: Elasticity and Anelasticity of Metals. J. Phys. Colloid Chem. 53, 1468–1468 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1021/j150474a01710.1021/j150474a017 ↗
74. Zhang, X., Zhou, H., Shi, W., Zeng, F., Zeng, H., Chen, G.: Vibration tests of 3D printed satellite structure made of lattice sandwich panels. AIAA J. 56, 4213–4217 (2018a). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J05724110.2514/1.J057241 ↗
75. Zhang, X.Z., Leary, M., Tang, H.P., Song, T., Qian, M.: Selective electron beam manufactured Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures for orthopedic implant applications: Current status and outstanding challenges. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 23, 75 (2018b)10.1016/j.cossms.2018.05.002 ↗
76. Zhu, J.H., Zhang, W.H., Xia, L.: Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures design. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 23, 595–622 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-015-9151-210.1007/s11831-015-9151-2 ↗