Adjoint shape design sensitivity analysis of molecular dynamics for lattice structures using GLE impedance forces
Source abstract
Abstract
We presented a shape design sensitivity analysis method for lattice structures using a generalized Langevin equation (GLE) to overcome the difficulty of discrete nature in atomic systems. Taking advantage of the GLE forces, the perturbed atomistic region is treated as the GLE impedance forces and the shape design problem of discrete atomic variations is converted into a non-shape problem with GLE impedance forces. We developed an adjoint variable method in order to improve the computational efficiency for molecular dynamics (MD) with many design variables. Due to the translational symmetry in lattice structure, the size of the time history kernel function that accounts for the boundary effects of reduced systems could be reduced to that of a single atoms DOFs. In numerical examples, the convergent characteristic of shape sensitivity according to the amount of shape variations is investigated in MD systems. Also, the results of the derived shape sensitivity turn out to be more accurate and efficient, compared with those of the finite difference ones.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Adelman, S.A., Doll, J.D.: Generalized langevin equation approach for atom/solid-surface scattering: collinear atom/harmonic chain model. J. Chem. Phys. 61(10), 4242–4245 (1974). doi: 10.1063/1.168172310.1063/1.1681723 ↗
2. Adelman, S.A., Doll, J.D.: Generalized langevin equation approach for atom/solid-surface scattering: general formulation for classical scattering off harmonic solids. J. Chem. Phys. 64(6), 2375–2388 (1976). doi: 10.1063/1.43252610.1063/1.432526 ↗
3. Armstrong, P., Peukert, W.: Size effects in the elastic deformation behavior of metallic nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 14(12), 1288 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s11051-012-1288-410.1007/s11051-012-1288-4 ↗
4. Cho, S., Choi, K.K.: Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of non-linear transient dynamics. Part I : sizing design. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 48(3), 351–373 (2000). doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48:3<351::AID-NME878>3.0.CO;2-P10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48:3%3C351::AID-NME878%3E3.0.CO;2-P ↗
5. Choi, K., Kim, N.: Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization 2: nonlinear systems and applications. Mechanical Engineering Series, Springer, (2006) http://books.google.co.kr/books?id=zNzUV3PlvycC
6. Gao, Z., Ma, Y., Zhuang, H.: Optimal shape design for the time-dependent navier?stokes flow. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 57(10), 1505–1526 (2008). doi: 10.1002/fld.167310.1002/fld.1673 ↗
7. Hsieh, C., Arora, J.: Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamic response. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 43(2), 195–219 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(84)90005-7 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004578258490005710.1016/0045-7825(84)90005-7 ↗
8. Jang, H.L., Kim, J.H., Park, Y., Cho, S.: Adjoint design sensitivity analysis of molecular dynamics in parallel computing environment. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 10(4), 379–394 (2014)10.1007/s10999-014-9253-2 ↗
9. Jones, JE.: On the determination of molecular fields. I. From the variation of the viscosity of a gas with temperature. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Charact. 106(738):441–462 (1924a). http://www.jstor.org/stable/9426410.1098/rspa.1924.0081 ↗
10. Jones, JE.: On the determination of molecular fields. II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A, Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Charact. 106(738):463–477 (1924b). http://www.jstor.org/stable/9426510.1098/rspa.1924.0082 ↗
11. Karpov, E.G., Wagner, G.J., Liu, W.K.: A green’s function approach to deriving non-reflecting boundary conditions in molecular dynamics simulations. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 62(9), 1250–1262 (2005). doi: 10.1002/nme.123410.1002/nme.1234 ↗
12. Kelchner, C.L., Plimpton, S.J., Hamilton, J.C.: Dislocation nucleation and defect structure during surface indentation. Phys. Rev. B 58, 11085–11088 (1998). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
13. Kim, MG., Jang, H., Kim, H., Cho, S.: Multiscale adjoint design sensitivity analysis of atomistic-continuum dynamic systems using bridging scale decomposition. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21(3):035005 (2013a). http://stacks.iop.org/0965-0393/21/i=3/a=03500510.1088/0965-0393/21/3/035005 ↗
14. Kim, M.G., Jang, H.L., Cho, S.: Adjoint design sensitivity analysis of reduced atomic systems using generalized Langevin equation for lattice structures. J. Comput. Phys. 240, 1–19 (2013b). doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.020 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199911300051X10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.020 ↗
15. Koh, S.J.A., Lee, H.P.: (2006) Molecular dynamics simulation of size and strain rate dependent mechanical response of fcc metallic nanowires. Nanotechnology 17(14):3451. http://stacks.iop.org/0957-4484/17/i=14/a=01810.1088/0957-4484/17/14/018 ↗
16. Li, D., Wang, F., Yang, Z., Zhao, Y.: How to identify dislocations in molecular dynamics simulations? Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 57(12), 2177–2187 (2014)10.1007/s11433-014-5617-8 ↗
17. Shibuta, Y., Suzuki, T.: A molecular dynamics study of the phase transition in bcc metal nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 129(14), 144102 (2008). doi: 10.1063/1.299143510.1063/1.2991435 ↗
18. Tortorelli, D.A., Haber, R.B., Lu, S.C.Y.: Design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear thermal systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 77(1–2), 61–77 (1989). doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(89)90128-X . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004578258990128X10.1016/0045-7825(89)90128-X ↗
19. Wagner, G.J., Liu, W.K.: Coupling of atomistic and continuum simulations using a bridging scale decomposition. J. Comput. Phys. 190(1), 249–274 (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00273-0 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199910300273010.1016/S0021-9991(03)00273-0 ↗
20. Wu, Z., Zhang, Y.W., Jhon, M.H., Gao, H., Srolovitz, D.J.: Nanowire failure: long = brittle and short = ductile. Nano Lett. 12(2), 910–914 (2012). doi: 10.1021/nl203980u10.1021/nl203980u ↗
21. Yang, Z., Lu, Z., Zhao, Y.P.: Shape effects on the yield stress and deformation of silicon nanowires: a molecular dynamics simulation. J. Appl. Phys. 106(2), 023537 (2009). doi: 10.1063/1.318661910.1063/1.3186619 ↗