Some aspects of workability studies on P/M sintered high strength 4% Titanium carbide composite steel preforms during cold upsetting
Source abstract
Abstract
Workability is concerned with the extent to which a material can be deformed in a specific metal working process without the initiation of cracks. Ductile fracture is the most common failure in bulk forming process. The formability is a complicated phenomenon which depends on the friction between the preform and the die surface in cold upsetting. A complete experimental investigation on the workability behavior of the steel composite of 4%TiC was performed under different stress states, namely, plane and triaxial stress state conditions. Cold upsetting of the Fe–1.0%C–4%Ti steel composite preforms was carried out applying different lubricants, namely, graphite, zinc stearate and molybdenum disulphide, and without lubricant, and the formability behaviour of the same under plane and triaxial stress state conditions was determined. The curves plotted for different preforms were analysed and relationship was established between the axial strain and the formability stress index under plane and triaxial state conditions. A relationship between the relative density and the axial strain was also established. Various stress ratio parameters, namely, (σθ/σeff), (σm/σeff) and (σz/σeff), under plane and triaxial stress state conditions were determined empirically as a function of the relative density. An attempt is also made to study the variation of slope of the relative density versus stress ratio parameters under plane and triaxial stress conditions with respect to the relative density to identify the pore closure mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Powder Metallurgy Techniques and Materials · Advanced materials and composites · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdel-Rahman, M., El-Sheikh, M.N.: Workability in forging of powder metallurgy compacts. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 54, 97–102 (1995)10.1016/0924-0136(95)01926-X ↗
2. Bockstiegel, Olsen, H.: Powder Metallurgy. Conf. Suppl. Part1, (1971) 127
3. Brown, G.T, Jones, P.K.: Modern developments in powder metallurgy, In: Edward N. Aqua, vol. 15, pp. 369–394 (1982)
4. Donachie, S.J., Church, N.L.: Effect of composition, temperature and crystal structure on the flow stress of P/M forged performs. The Int. J. Powder Metall. Powder Technol. 10(1), 59–66 (1974)
5. Doraivelu, S.M., Gegel, H.L., Gunasekaran, J.S., Malas, J.C., Morugan, J.T.: A new yield function for compressible P/M materials. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 26, (9/10) 527–535 (1984)10.1016/0020-7403(84)90006-7 ↗
6. Dower, J., Miles, G.I.: High velocity extrusion forging of billets compacted from iron and steel powders. Powder Metall. 13(26), 85–99 (1970)10.1179/pom.1970.13.26.002 ↗
7. Durdaller, C.: Powders for Forging, Source Book on Powder Metallurgy, Compiled by Samuel Bradbury, ASM, Ohio, (1979) 161–163
8. Green, R.J.: A plasticity theory for porous solids. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 14, 215–224 (1972)10.1016/0020-7403(72)90063-X ↗
9. Jones, P.: Densification Strategies for high endurance P/M compacts. Int. J. Powder Metall. 33(3), 37–43 (1997)
10. Kim, K.T., Yang, H.C., Hong, S.T.: Densification behaviour of Titanium alloy powder compacts at high temperature. Powder Metall. 44(1), 34–35 (2001)10.1179/003258901666149 ↗
11. Ko, D.-C., Kim, B.-M., Choi, J.-C.: Prediction of surface fracture initiation in the axisymmetric extrusion and simple upsetting of an aluminium alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 62, 166–174 (1996)10.1016/0924-0136(95)02200-7 ↗
12. Kuhn, H.A. et.al.: Modern developments in powder metallurgy, In: Edward N. Aqua, vol. 15, pp. 463–479 (1982)
13. Majumdar, P., Davies, T.J.: Porosity and densification of P/M forging performs. Int. J. Powder Metall. 15(2), 103–112 (1979)
14. Narayanasamy, R., Pandey, K.S.: Salient features in the cold upset forming of sintered aluminium – 3.5% alumina powder composite performs. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 72, 201–207 (1997)10.1016/S0924-0136(97)00169-6 ↗
15. Narayansamy, R., Pandey, K.S.: A study of barreling of sintered iron powder preform during hot forging. J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 100, 84–94 (2000)
16. Narayanasamy, R., Ponalagusamy, R.: A mathematical theory of plasticity for the upsetting of compressible P/M materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 97, 107 (2000)10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00356-8 ↗
17. Narayansamy, R., Ponalagusamy, R., Subramanian, K.R.: Generalised yield criteria of porous sintered powder metallurgy metals. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 110, 182–185 (2001)10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00884-0 ↗
18. Narayanasamy, R., Ramesh, T., Pandey, K.S.: Some aspects on workability of aluminium–iron powder metallurgy composite during cold upsetting. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 391, 418–426 (2005)10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.018 ↗
19. Pandey, K.S.: Indigeneously developed ceramic coating. R.E.C.Trichy, Tamilnadu, India (1986)
20. Rao, K.P., Hawbolt, E.B.: Development of constitutive relationship using compression testing of a medium carbon steel. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME 114, 116–123 (1992)10.1115/1.2904131 ↗
21. Satsangi, P.S., Sharma, P.C., Prakash, R.: An elastic plastic finite element method for the analysis of powder metal forging. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 80, 136 (2003)
22. Shima, S., Oyane, M.: Plasticity theory for porous metals. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 18, 285–291 (1976)10.1016/0020-7403(76)90030-8 ↗
23. Sowerby, R., O’Reilly, I., Chardrasekaran, N., Dung, N.L.: Material testing for cold forging. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Tran. ASME 106, 101–106 (1984)10.1115/1.3225668 ↗
24. Tewari, H.N., Sharan, R.: Analysis of Iron powder preform forging. Transactions of PMAI, 12, 83–86 (1985)
25. Vujovic, A.H., Shabalk, J.: A new workability criterion for ductile metals. Eng. Mater. Technol. Tran. ASME. 108, 245–249 (1986)10.1115/1.3225876 ↗