Inter-track porosity and macroporosity insights into mechanical properties of FDM printed samples using in-situ 4D XCT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Akifyev, K.N., Kharin, N.V., Statsenko, E.O., Sachenkov, O.A., Bolshakov, P.V.: Pilot study of lattice endoprosthesis buckling by compression in-situ using X-ray tomography. Russ. J. Biomech. 27(4), 32–39 (2023a). https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2023.4.0310.15593/RJBiomech/2023.4.03 ↗
2. Akifyev, K.N., Statsenko, E.O., Smirnova, V.V., Kharin, N.V., Bolshakov, P.V., Sachenkov, O.A.: Method for studying the porosity of fluid phase samples by x-ray computed tomography under uniaxial compression. PNRPU Mech. Bull. 2, 11–21 (2023b). https://doi.org/10.15593/perm.mech/2023.2.0210.15593/perm.mech/2023.2.02 ↗
3. Al-Munajjed, A.A., Hien, M., Kujat, R., Gleeson, J.P., Hammer, J.: Influence of pore size on tensile strength, permeability and porosity of hyaluronan-collagen scaffolds. J. Mater. Sci.—Mater. Med. 19, 2859–2864 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3422-510.1007/s10856-008-3422-5 ↗
4. Bahrami Babamiri B., Askari H.,Hazeli K. Deformation mechanisms and post-yielding behavior of additively manufactured lattice structures. Materials & Design, 2020, vol. 188, art. 108443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10844310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108443 ↗
5. Baptista R., Guedes M. Porosity and pore design influence on fatigue behavior of 3D printed scaffolds for trabecular bone replacement. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2021, vol.117, art. 7104378, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10437810.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104378 ↗
6. Bolshakov P, Raginov I, Egorov V, Kashapova R, Kashapov R, Baltina T, Sachenkov O. Design and Optimization Lattice Endoprosthesis for Long Bones: Manufacturing and Clinical Experiment. Materials, 2020, vol. 13(5), art. 1185, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1305118510.3390/ma13051185 ↗
7. Bolshakov P., Kuchumov, A. G., Kharin N., Akifyev K., Statsenko E., Silberschmidt V. V. Method of computational design for additive manufacturing of hip endoprosthesis based on basic‐cell concept. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 2024, vol. 40(3), art. e3802, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3802.10.1002/cnm.3802 ↗
8. Bolshakov P, Kharin N, Kashapov R, Sachenkov O. Structural Design Method for Constructions: Simulation, Manufacturing and Experiment. Materials, 2021; vol. 14(20), art. 6064, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1420606410.3390/ma14206064 ↗
9. Cai, C., Song, B., Xue, P., Wei, Q., Wu, J., Wei, L., Shi, Y.: Effect of hot isostatic pressing procedure on performance of Ti6Al4V: Surface qualities, microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloy. Compd. 686, 55–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.28010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.280 ↗
10. Chakma P., Luo Y. Impact of regular and irregular pore distributions on the elasticity of porous materials: A Microstructure-Free Finite Element Study. Materials, 2024, vol. 17(18), art. 4490, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17184490.10.3390/ma17184490 ↗
11. Dai S., Deng Z. C., Yu Y. J., Zhang K., Wang S. H., Ye J. Orthotropic elastic behaviors and yield strength of fused deposition modeling materials: Theory and experiments. Polymer Testing, 2020, vol.87, art. 106520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10652010.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106520 ↗
12. Deering J., Chen J., Mahmoud D., Tang T., Lin Y., Fang Q., Wohl G. R., Elbestawi M., Grandfield K. Characterizing mineral ellipsoids in new bone formation at the interface of TI6AL4V porous implants. Advanced Materials Interfaces, 2023, vol. 10(24), https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202300333.10.1002/admi.202300333 ↗
13. Diederichs, A.M., Thiel, F., Lienert, U., Pantleon, W.: In-situ investigations of structural changes during cyclic loading by high resolution reciprocal space mapping. Proc. Struct. Integrity 7, 268–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.08810.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.088 ↗
14. Duan, B., Shen, T., Wang, D.: Effects of solid loading on pore structure and properties of porous FeAl intermetallics by gel casting. Powder Technol. 344, 169–176 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.01910.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.019 ↗
15. Du Plessis A., Razavi S. M. J., Berto F. The effects of microporosity in struts of gyroid lattice structures produced by laser powder bed fusion. Materials & Design, 2020, vol. 194, art. 108899, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10889910.1016/j.matdes.2020.108899 ↗
16. Feng, C., Cui, Z.: A 3-D model for void evolution in viscous materials under large compressive deformation. Int. J. Plast.plast. 74, 192–212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2015.06.01210.1016/j.ijplas.2015.06.012 ↗
17. Gerasimov, O.V., Sharafutdinova, K.R., Karaman, V.S., Saleeva, G.T., Sachenkov, O.A.: CT-based assessment of the stress state of dog spines. Russ. J. Biomech. 28(1), 33–44 (2024). https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2023.1.0310.15593/RJBiomech/2023.1.03 ↗
18. Gerasimov O. V., Kharin N. V., Fedyanin A. O., Bolshakov P. V., Baltin M. E., Statsenko E. O., Fadeev F. O., Islamov R. R., Baltina T. V., Sachenkov O. A. Bone Stress-Strain state Evaluation using CT based FEM. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2021.68847410.3389/fmech.2021.688474 ↗
19. Gonabadi, H., Hosseini, S.F., Chen, Y., Bull, S.: Size effects of voids on the mechanical properties of 3D printed parts. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 132(11–12), 1–18 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13683-910.1007/s00170-024-13683-9 ↗
20. Griffiths, L., Heap, M.J., Xu, T., Chen, C., Baud, P.: The influence of pore geometry and orientation on the strength and stiffness of porous rock. J. Struct. Geol.struct. Geol. 96, 149–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2017.02.00610.1016/j.jsg.2017.02.006 ↗
21. Hernandez J. L., Woodrow K. A. Medical applications of porous biomaterials: features of porosity and Tissue‐Specific implications for biocompatibility. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2022, vol. 11(9), art. e2102087, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202102087.10.1002/adhm.202102087 ↗
22. Hufenbach, W., Böhm, R., Gude, M., Berthel, M., Hornig, A., Ručevskis, S., Andrich, M.: A test device for damage characterisation of composites based on in situ computed tomography. Compos. Sci. Technol. 72(12), 1361–1367 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00710.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.007 ↗
23. Jiang, Y., Shi, K., Zhou, L., He, M., Zhu, C., Wang, J., Li, J., Li, Y., Liu, L., Sun, D., Feng, G., Yi, Y., Zhang, L.: 3D-printed auxetic-structured intervertebral disc implant for potential treatment of lumbar herniated disc. Bioactive Mater. 20, 528–538 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.00210.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.06.002 ↗
24. Kanwar S., Al-Ketan O., Vijayavenkataraman S. A novel method to design biomimetic, 3D printable stochastic scaffolds with controlled porosity for bone tissue engineering. Materials & Design, 2022, vol. 220, art. 110857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11085710.1016/j.matdes.2022.110857 ↗
25. Kharin, N.V., Gerasimov, O.V., Bolshakov, P.V., Khabibullin, A.A., Fedyanin, A.O., Baltin, M.E., Baltina, T.V., Sachenkov, O.A.: Technique for determining the orthotropic properties of the bone organ according to computer tomography. Russ. J. Biomech. 23, 395–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2019.3.1110.15593/RJBiomech/2019.3.11 ↗
26. Kharin N, Bolshakov P, Kuchumov AG. Numerical and Experimental Study of a Lattice Structure for Orthopedic Applications. Materials, 2023; vol.16(2), art. 744, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1602074410.3390/ma16020744 ↗
27. Lagarrigue P., Oh J., Xie J., Tenailleau C., Duployer B., Cazalbou S., Poquillon D., Drouet C., Soulié J. Freeze-cast Mg-Fe-CO3 nano-layered double hydroxide/alginate composite scaffolds for bone substitution: porous architecture and mechanical properties. Next Materials, 2024, vol. 3, art. 100147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nxmate.2024.10014710.1016/j.nxmate.2024.100147 ↗
28. Le V.-D., Pessard E., Morel F., Prigent S. Fatigue behaviour of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V alloy: The role of defects on scatter and statistical size effect. International Journal of Fatigue, 2020, vol. 140, art. 105811, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10581110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105811 ↗
29. Maconachie T., Leary M., Lozanovski B., Zhang X., Qian M., Faruque O., Brandt M. SLM lattice structures: Properties, performance, applications and challenges. Materials & Design, 2019, vol. 188, art. 108137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10813710.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
30. Maslov, L.B., Dmitryuk, A.Y., Zhmaylo, M.A., Tarasenko, F.D., Kovalenko, A.N.: Strength analysis in a hip endoprosthesis made of polymeric material. Russ. J. Biomech. 4, 14–28 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15593/RJBiomech/2022.4.0210.15593/RJBiomech/2022.4.02 ↗
31. Meftah S. A., Aldosari S. M., Tounsi A., Cuong-Le T., Khedher K. M., Alluqmani A. E. Simplified homogenization technique for nonlinear finite element analysis of in-plane loaded masonry walls. Engineering Structures, 2024, vol. 306, art. 117822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117822.10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117822 ↗
32. Papazoglou D. P., Neidhard-Doll A. T., Pinnell M. F., Erdahl D. S., Osborn T. H. Compression and Tensile Testing of L-PBF Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Structures with Biomimetic Porosities and Strut Geometries for Orthopedic Implants. Metals, 2024, vol. 14(2), art. 232, https://doi.org/10.3390/met14020232.10.3390/met14020232 ↗
33. Qian, W., Wu, S., Lei, L., Hu, Q., Liu, C.: Time lapse in situ X-ray imaging of failure in structural materials under cyclic loads and extreme environments. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 175, 80–103 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.07.04110.1016/j.jmst.2023.07.041 ↗
34. Ranjbarzadeh R., Sappa G. Numerical and Experimental study of fluid flow and heat transfer in porous media: a review article. Energies, 2025, vol. 18(4), art. 976, https://doi.org/10.3390/en18040976.10.3390/en18040976 ↗
35. Rstakyan V., Mkhitaryan L., Baghdasaryan L., Ghaltaghchyan T., Karabekian Z., Sevoyan G., Aghayan M., Rodríguez M. Á. Stereolithography of ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: Influence of hydroxyapatite/silica ratio on mechanical properties. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2024, vol. 152, art. 106421, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.10642110.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106421 ↗
36. Sachenkov O.A., Bolshakov P.V., Gerasimov O.V., Statsenko E.O., Akifyev K.N. A device for determining the structure of a material or specimens under uniaxial compression and a method of using it. Russian Federation Patent number 2755098, 2021.
37. Safaei, B., Memarzadeh, A., Asmael, M., Saeid, S., Qasim, Z., Tien-Chien, J., Zhaoye, Q.: Challenges and advancements in additive manufacturing of nylon and nylon composite materials: a comprehensive analysis of mechanical properties, morphology, and recent progress. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 33, 6261–6305 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09368-910.1007/s11665-024-09368-9 ↗
38. Sandström, C., Larsson, F., Runesson, K.: Homogenization of coupled flow and deformation in a porous material. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 308, 535–551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.05.02110.1016/j.cma.2016.05.021 ↗
39. Saviour CM. Gupta S. Design of a functionally graded porous uncemented acetabularcomponent: Influence of polar gradation. Int J Numer Meth Biomed Engng, 2023, vol. 39(6), art. 3709, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.37092010.1002/cnm.370920 ↗
40. Seehanam S., Khrueaduangkham S., Sinthuvanich C., Sae-Ueng U., Srimaneepong V., Promoppatum P. Evaluating the effect of pore size for 3d-printed bone scaffolds. Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10(4), art. e26005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26005.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26005 ↗
41. Semenova, E., Gerasimov, O., Koroleva, E., Ahmetov, N., Baltina, T., Sachenkov, O.: Automatic processing and analysis of the quality healing of derma injury. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput.intell. Syst. Comput. 83, 107–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97286-2_1010.1007/978-3-319-97286-2_10 ↗
42. Simon M, Indermaur M, Schenk D, Hosseinitabatabaei S, Willie BM, Zysset P. Fabric-elasticity relationships of tibial trabecular bone are similar in osteogenesis imperfecta and healthy individuals. Bone, 2022, vol 155, art. 116282, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2021.116282.10.1016/j.bone.2021.116282 ↗
43. Soloviev, D., Maslov, L., Zhmaylo, M.: Acetabular implant finite element simulation with customised estimate of bone properties. Materials 16, 398 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1601039810.3390/ma16010398 ↗
44. Sun, J., Dong, Z., Zhu, S., Tian, S., Zhou, J.: Pore structure evolution of mudstone caprock under cyclic load-unload and its influence on breakthrough pressure. Front. Earth Sci. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-022-1019-910.1007/s11707-022-1019-9 ↗
45. Takano, N., Fukasawa, K., Nishiyabu, K.: Structural strength prediction for porous titanium based on micro-stress concentration by micro-CT image-based multiscale simulation. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 52, 229–235 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.01310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.09.013 ↗
46. Wang, Z., Schmitt, D.R., Wang, R.: Modeling of viscoelastic properties of nonpermeable porous rocks saturated with highly viscous fluid at seismic frequencies at the core scale. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122(8), 6067–6086 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jb01397910.1002/2017jb013979 ↗
47. Wang B., Sun L., Pan B. Mapping internal deformation fields in 3D printed porous structure with digital volume correlation. Polymer Testing, 2019, vol. 78, art. 105945, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10594510.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105945 ↗
48. Xin, T., Liang, B., Wang, J., Sun, W., Sun, Y.: Experimental study on the evolution trend of the pore structure and the permeability of coal under cyclic loading and unloading. ACS Omega 6, 35830–35843 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0611810.1021/acsomega.1c06118 ↗
49. Yang H., Zhu E., Liu L. Analysis of the Effect of Pore Structure on the Mechanical Properties of Concrete Based on the Meso Numerical Model. Applied Sciences, 2022, vol. 12(11), art. 5428, https://doi.org/10.3390/app12115428.10.3390/app12115428 ↗
50. Yuan S., Chua C.K., Zhou K. 3D-Printed Mechanical Metamaterials with High Energy Absorption. Advanced Materials Technologies, 2018, vol.4, art. 1800419, https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20180041910.1002/admt.201800419 ↗
51. Zhang, X., Zhang, K., Zhang, B., Li, Y., He, R.: Mechanical properties of additively-manufactured cellular ceramic structures: a comprehensive study. J. Adv. Ceram. 11, 1918–1931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-022-0656-510.1007/s40145-022-0656-5 ↗
52. Zhang R., Guo R.Voronoi cell finite element model to simulate crack propagation in porous materials. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2021, vol.115, art. 103045, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2021.10304510.1016/j.tafmec.2021.103045 ↗
53. Zhang M., Sun H., Song C., Li Y., Hou M. Pores Evolution of Soft Clay under Loading/Unloading Process. Applied Sciences, 2020, vol.10, art. 8468, https://doi.org/10.3390/app1023846810.3390/app10238468 ↗
54. Zhu, L., Li, M., Xu, W.: Direct design to stress mapping for cellular structures. Visual Informat. 3, 69–80 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2019.07.00210.1016/j.visinf.2019.07.002 ↗