journal article·2024-04

A new learning strategy for analyzing multi-mode system reliability by considering the correlation effect of multiple Kriging models

Yixin Yang, Zhenzhou Lu, Kaixuan Feng, Yuhua Yan

Publisher page

Abstract

The Kriging model with numerical simulation can analyze reliability efficiently, but its extension in multi-mode system is troubled by the hard quantification of correlations among Kriging models of multiple limit state functions. For this issue, a new learning strategy (NLS) is proposed by considering correlation effect. Firstly, NLS accurately derives the cumulative distribution function (CDF) boundary of the system Kriging model, and it considers the correlations among Kriging models of all system modes. By this CDF boundary, NLS derives the upper bound probability of the system Kriging model misjudging candidate sample state, on which the most contributive sample is selected to improve the capability of system Kriging model judging system state. Secondly, NLS only adds most contributive sample to the training set of the most easily identified mode to avoid computational cost on updating the Kriging models of unimportant modes. Thirdly, by employing the upper bound of expected relative error of failure probability estimated by prediction and prediction mean of system Kriging model, a convergence criterion is used to improve efficiency under acceptable accuracy. The superiorities, including in selecting training point, updating mode and convergence criterion, of NLS over the up-to-date methods for analyzing the system reliability are demonstrated by examples.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdollahi, A., Moghaddam, M.A., Monfared, S.A.H., et al.: A refined subset simulation for the reliability analysis using the subset control variate. Struct Saf 87, 102002 (2020)10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102002 ↗
2. Au, S.-K., Beck, J.L.: Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech 16, 263–277 (2001)10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4 ↗
3. Bichon, B.J., Eldred, M.S., Swiler, L.P., et al.: Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J 46, 2459–2468 (2008)10.2514/1.34321 ↗
4. Bichon, B.J., McFarland, J.M., Mahadevan, S.: Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96, 1386–1395 (2011)10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.008 ↗
5. Breitung, K.: Asymptotic approximations for probability integrals. Probab Eng Mech 4, 187–190 (1989)10.1016/0266-8920(89)90024-6 ↗
6. Bucher, C., Most, T.: A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 23, 154–163 (2008)10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.022 ↗
7. Chan, J., Papaioannou, I., Straub, D.: An adaptive subset simulation algorithm for system reliability analysis with discontinuous limit states. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 225, 108607 (2022)10.1016/j.ress.2022.108607 ↗
8. Cornell, C.A.: Bounds on the reliability of structural systems. J. Struct 93, 171–200 (1967)
9. Cui, W., Blockley, D.I.: On the bounds for structural system reliability. Struct Saf 9, 247–259 (1991)10.1016/0167-4730(91)90047-D ↗
10. Echard, B., Gayton, N., Lemaire, M.: AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation. Struct Saf 33, 145–154 (2011)10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002 ↗
11. Fauriat, W., Gayton, N.: AK-SYS: an adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 123, 137–144 (2014)10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.010 ↗
12. Feng, K., Lu, Z., Wang, L.: A novel dual-stage adaptive Kriging method for profust reliability analysis. J Comput Phys 419, 109701 (2020)10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109701 ↗
13. Hawchar, L., El Soueidy, C.P., Schoefs, F.: Principal component analysis and polynomial chaos expansion for time-variant reliability problems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93, 964–979 (2017)
14. Kabasi, S., Roy, A., Chakraborty, S.: A generalized moving least square–based response surface method for efficient reliability analysis of structure. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63, 1085–1097 (2021)10.1007/s00158-020-02743-9 ↗
15. Kitayama, S., Yoshioka, H.: Springback reduction with control of punch speed and blank holder force via sequential approximate optimization with radial basis function network. Int J Mech Mater Des 10, 109–119 (2014)10.1007/s10999-013-9234-x ↗
16. Li, H.S., Lü, Z.Z., Yue, Z.F.: Support vector machine for structural reliability analysis. Appl Math Mech 27, 1295–1303 (2006)10.1007/s10483-006-1001-z ↗
17. Ling, C., Lu, Z.: Support vector machine-based importance sampling for rare event estimation. Struct Multidiscip Optim 63, 1609–1631 (2021)10.1007/s00158-020-02809-8 ↗
18. Matheron, G.: The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Adv Appl Probab 5, 439–468 (1973)10.2307/1425829 ↗
19. Melchers, R.E.: Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6, 3–10 (1989)10.1016/0167-4730(89)90003-9 ↗
20. Metropolis, N., Ulam, S.: The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44, 335–341 (1949)10.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
21. Misraji, M.A., Valdebenito, M.A., Jensen, H.A., et al.: Application of directional importance sampling for estimation of first excursion probabilities of linear structural systems subject to stochastic Gaussian loading. Mech Syst Signal Pr 139, 106621 (2020)10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106621 ↗
22. Papaioannou, I., Straub, D.: Combination line sampling for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 88, 102025 (2021)10.1016/j.strusafe.2020.102025 ↗
23. Pepper, N., Crespo, L., Montomoli, F.: Adaptive learning for reliability analysis using support vector machines. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 226, 108635 (2022)10.1016/j.ress.2022.108635 ↗
24. Pradlwarter, H.J., Schueller, G.I., Koutsourelakis, P.S., et al.: Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems. Struct Saf 29, 208–221 (2007)10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.009 ↗
25. Rackwitz, R., Flessler, B.: Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Comput Struct 9, 489–494 (1978)10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9 ↗
26. Sadoughi, M., Li, M., Hu, C.: Multivariate system reliability analysis considering highly nonlinear and dependent safety events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 180, 189–200 (2018)10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.015 ↗
27. Sofi, A., Muscolino, G., Giunta, F.: Propagation of uncertain structural properties described by imprecise probability density functions via response surface method. Probab Eng Mech 60, 103020 (2020)10.1016/j.probengmech.2020.103020 ↗
28. Tabandeh, A., Jia, G., Gardoni, P.: A review and assessment of importance sampling methods for reliability analysis. Struct Saf 97, 102216 (2022)10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102216 ↗
29. Teixeira, R., Nogal, M., O’Connor, A., et al.: Reliability assessment with density scanned adaptive Kriging. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 199, 106908 (2020)10.1016/j.ress.2020.106908 ↗
30. Xiao, M., Zhang, J., Gao, L.: A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 199, 106935 (2020)10.1016/j.ress.2020.106935 ↗
31. Yang, X., Liu, Y., Ma, P.: Structural reliability analysis under evidence theory using the active learning kriging model. Eng Optimiz 49, 1922–1938 (2017)10.1080/0305215X.2016.1277063 ↗
32. Yang, S., Jo, H., Lee, K., et al.: Expected system improvement (ESI): a new learning function for system reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 222, 108449 (2022)10.1016/j.ress.2022.108449 ↗
33. Youn, B.D., Choi, K.K., Yang, R.J., et al.: Reliability-based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact. Struct Multidiscip Optim 26, 272–283 (2004)10.1007/s00158-003-0345-0 ↗
34. Yuan, K., Xiao, N.C., Wang, Z., et al.: System reliability analysis by combining structure function and active learning kriging model. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 195, 106734 (2020)10.1016/j.ress.2019.106734 ↗
35. Yun, W., Lu, Z., Zhou, Y., et al.: AK-SYSi: an improved adaptive Kriging model for system reliability analysis with multiple failure modes by a refined U learning function. Struct Multidiscip Optim 59, 263–278 (2019)10.1007/s00158-018-2067-3 ↗
36. Zhang, X., Lu, Z., Cheng, K.: AK-DS: An adaptive Kriging-based directional sampling method for reliability analysis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 156, 107610 (2021)10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107610 ↗
37. Zhang, Y., Ma, J., Du, W.: A new radial basis function active learning method based on distance constraint for structural reliability analysis. Int J Mech Mater Des 19, 567 (2023)10.1007/s10999-023-09644-x ↗
38. Zhou, Y., Lu, Z., Yun, W.: Active sparse polynomial chaos expansion for system reliability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 202, 107025 (2020)10.1016/j.ress.2020.107025 ↗
39. Zou, T., Mahadevan, S.: A direct decoupling approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 31, 190–200 (2006)10.1007/s00158-005-0572-7 ↗