Physical and numerical assessments of the penetration behavior of coplanar linear shape charges
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to demolish irregular constructions that are usually composed of convex, concave, and straight structures based on the shaped charge jet. Accordingly, the penetration behaviour of convergent, divergent, and straight linear shaped charges (LSCs) have been detected with numerical and physical methods. For comparison purposes, numerical models for all three types of LSCs with identical cross-sections have been established to investigate the impacts of structural features. It is found that the shaped charge structure not only determines the kinematic consumption during the penetration process but also influences the initial value of the jet velocity. Additionally, because of the interactions between the previous and subsequent jets, the jet velocity of the convergent LSC shows an obvious undulation during the penetration process. Furthermore, quantitative analyses of the kinematic consumption and initial velocity differences for three types of LSCs are conducted with physical models. A kinematic consumption difference is revealed, and the mass of the charge that determines the initial jet velocity as a function of the geometric parameters in three types of LSCs is deduced. Finally, we combined the numerical and physical models and conducted integral analyses to assess the penetration behaviours of the three LSC types.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Ayisit, O.: The influence of asymmetries in shaped charge performance. Int. J. Impact Eng. 35(12), 1399–1404 (2008)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.027 ↗
2. Brown, J., Softley, I.D., Edwards, P.: Experimental study of shaped charge with built-in asymmetries. Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 18(5), 225–258 (1993)10.1002/prep.19930180504 ↗
3. Brown, J., Edwards, P.J., Lee, P.R.: Studies of shaped charges with built-in asymmetries Part II: Modelling. Propell. Explos. Pyrot. 21(2), 59–63 (1996)10.1002/prep.19960210202 ↗
4. Feng, D.L., Liu, M.B., Li, H.Q., Liu, G.R.: Smoothed particle hydrodynamics modeling of linear shaped charge with jet formation and penetration effects. Comput. Fluids 86, 77–85 (2013)10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.06.033 ↗
5. Fu, Y., Zhang, C.: Hewing out evacuation routes for burning buses by linear-shaped charge jet. SAE Int. J. Trans. Saf 7(1), 17–30 (2019)
6. Grove, B., Heiland, J., Walton, I.: Geologic material’s response to shaped charge penetration. Int. J. Impact Eng. 35(12), 1563–1566 (2008)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.07.038 ↗
7. Guo, H., Zheng, Y., Yu, Q., Ge, C., Wang, H.: Penetration behavior of reactive liner shaped charge jet impacting thick steel plates. Int. J. Impact Eng. 126, 76–84 (2018)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.12.005 ↗
8. Hallquist, J.O.: LS_DYNA User’s Manual. LSTC 34–394 (1997)
9. Jonhson, G.R., Cook, W.H.: A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 21, 541–548 (1983)
10. Kleiser, G., Lambert, D.: Control of shaped charge jets through non-uniform confinement. Procedia Eng. 103, 302–309 (2015)10.1016/j.proeng.2015.04.051 ↗
11. Lim, S.: Steady state equation of motion of a linear shaped charges liner. Int. J. Impact Eng. 44, 10–16 (2012)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.12.003 ↗
12. Molinari, J.F.: Finite element simulation of shaped charges. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 38, 921–936 (2002)10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00085-9 ↗
13. Pack, D.C.: On the perturbation and break up of a high-speed, elongating metal jet. J. Appl. Phys. 63(6), 1864–1871 (1988)10.1063/1.339883 ↗
14. Szymczak, T., Makowska, K., Kowalewski, Z.L., Lasota, P.: An influence of impact energy on magnesium alloy behavior. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 16, 139–153 (2020)10.1007/s10999-019-09461-1 ↗
15. Walters, W.P., Zukas, J.A.: Fundamentals of shaped charges. Wiley, Hoboken (1989)
16. Walters, W.: Introduction to shaped charges. Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, ARL, ARL-SR-150, March; (2007)
17. Wang, C., Xu, W., Yuen, S.C.K.: Penetration of shaped charge into layered and spaced concrete targets. Int. J. Impact Eng. 112, 193–206 (2017a)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.10.013 ↗
18. Wang, F., Jiang, J., Men, J., Bai, Y., Wang, S., Li, M.: Investigation on shaped charge jet density gradient for metal matrix composites: experimental design and execution. Int. J. Impact Eng. 109, 311–320 (2017b)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.07.011 ↗
19. Wu, J., Liu, J., Du, Y.: Experimental and numerical study on the flight and penetration properties of explosively-formed projectile. Int. J. Impact Eng. 34, 1147–1162 (2007)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.06.007 ↗
20. Xiao, Q., Huang, Z., Jia, X., Zu, X., Zhu, Q.: Shaped charge penetrator into soil-concrete double-layered target. Int. J. Impact Eng. 109, 302–310 (2017)10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.07.003 ↗
21. Yao, R., Su, F., Mao, R.: Influence of interfacial bonding conditions on the anti-penetration performance of ceramic/metal composite targets. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 15, 833–844 (2019)10.1007/s10999-019-09445-1 ↗