Simulation of ultra-thin membranes with creases
Source abstract
Abstract
Two dimensional nature of thin membranes has led to their evolution as an essential component in space structures that demand lighter mass and compact packaging. Origami based folding patterns are used to fold these membranes into compact configurations by introducing plastic deformations along the predetermined fold-lines referred to as creases. Creases have been observed to alter the material state and the mechanical response of highly compacted thin membranes, leading to changes in their deployment behaviour outer space. This paper proposes an idealised connector element based method which introduces rotational stiffness associated with the creases while eliminating the requirement for a large number of small shell elements to capture accurate deployment behaviour. First, an experiment is carried out to quantify the fold-line rotational stiffness of Kapton polyimide film. Then, the technique is implemented in a commercially available finite element package ABAQUS simulating the deployment of a single-folded thin membrane, and is identified to capture in-plane and out-of-plane displacements with a better approximation than the other existing crease modelling techniques. Then the applicability of the proposed technique is validated against a quasi-static deployment experiment of a solar sail model available in the literature. The use of the proposed technique has proven to be qualitatively effective in terms of inducing a quasi-static deployment that achieves fair quantitative agreement as well.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Abaqus, Analysis User Guide, Dassault Systems, Simulia Crop. Providence, RI (2014)
2. Andrew, A.C., Philip, B.C., James, J.J., Gregory, R.W., Richard, V.A.: Characterization of creases in polymers for adaptive origami structures. In: ASME 2014 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems SMASIS2014, Newport (2014)
3. Arya, M., Pellegrino, S.: Deployment mechanics of highly compacted thin membrane structures. In: Spacecraft Structures Conference. National Harbor, Maryland, pp. 1–14 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-103810.2514/6.2014-1038 ↗
4. Arya, M., Lee, N., Pellegrino, S.: Crease-free biaxial packaging of thick membranes with slipping folds. Int. J. Solids Struct. 108, 24–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.01310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.013 ↗
5. Autodesk.: AutoCAD 2021. Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, California (2021)
6. Cai, J., Ren, Z., Ding, Y., Deng, X., Xu, Y., Feng, J.: Deployment simulation of foldable origami membrane structures. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 67, 343–353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.00210.1016/j.ast.2017.04.002 ↗
7. Chen, Y., Peng, R., You, Z.: Origami of thick panels. Science 349(6246), 396–400 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab287010.1126/science.aab2870 ↗
8. De Focatiis, D.S.A., Guest, S.D.: Deployable membranes designed from folding tree leaves. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 360(1791), 227–238 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.092810.1098/rsta.2001.0928 ↗
9. Dharmadasa, B.Y., Jiménez, F.L.: Modeling the effects of creases in an unfolding membrane. In: AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum (2021). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-125810.2514/6.2021-1258 ↗
10. Dharmadasa, B.Y., McCallum, M.W., Mierunalan, S., Dassanayake, S.P., Mallikarachchi, C.H.M.Y., López Jiménez, F.: Formation of plastic creases in thin polyimide films. J. Appl. Mech. 87(5), 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404600210.1115/1.4046002 ↗
11. Dias, M.A., Dudte, L.H., Mahadevan, L., Santangelo, C.D.: Geometric mechanics of curved crease origami. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.11430110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.114301 ↗
12. Dupont, Dupont Kapton Summary of Properties (2021)
13. Eriksson, A., Faroughi, S.: Quasi-static inflation simulations based on co-rotational triangular space membrane elements. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 13(3), 1250067 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945541250067810.1142/S0219455412500678 ↗
14. Faroughi, S., Eriksson, A.: Co-rotational formulation for dynamic analysis of space membranes based on triangular elements. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 13, 229–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-015-9326-x10.1007/s10999-015-9326-x ↗
15. Gruber, P., Häuplik, S., Imhof, B., Özdemir, K., Waclavicek, R., Perino, M.A.: Deployable structures for a human lunar base. Acta Astronaut. 61(1), 484–495 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.05510.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.055 ↗
16. Guest, S.D.: Deployable Structures: Concepts and Analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (1994)
17. Guest, S., Pellegrino, S.: Inextensional wrapping of at membranes. In: First International Seminar Structure and Morphology. Morphol, pp 203–215 (1992)
18. Han, H., Sorokin, V., Tang, L., Cao, D.: Lightweight origami isolators with deployable mechanism and quasi-zero-stiffness property. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 121, 107319 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.10731910.1016/j.ast.2021.107319 ↗
19. Hossain, N.M.A., Woo, K., Jenkins, C.H.: Nonlinear material response of systematically creased membranes. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. New Port, Rhode (2006)10.2514/6.2006-1801 ↗
20. Hu, X., Gong, S.: Flexibility influence on passive stability of a spinning solar sail. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 58, 60–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.08.00510.1016/j.ast.2016.08.005 ↗
21. Lechenault, F., Thiria, B., Adda-Bedia, M.: Mechanical response of a creased sheet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112(24), 244301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.24430110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.244301 ↗
22. Lichodziejewski, D., Derbès, B., Slade, K., Mann, T.: Vacuum deployment and testing of a 4-quadrant scalable inflatable rigidizable solar sail system. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Austin (2005)10.2514/6.2005-2122 ↗
23. Liu, C., Shi, Y.: Comprehensive structural analysis and optimization of the electrostatic forming membrane reflector deployable antenna. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 53, 267 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AST.2016.03.02610.1016/J.AST.2016.03.026 ↗
24. Liu, K., Paulino, G.H.: Nonlinear mechanics of non-rigid origami: An efficient computational approach. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.034810.1098/rspa.2017.0348 ↗
25. Liyanage, P., Gangasudan, N., Mallikarachchi, H.: Modified spiral folding pattern for deployable membranes. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 117, 106926 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.10692610.1016/j.ast.2021.106926 ↗
26. Mallikarachchi, H.M.Y.C., Pellegrino, S.: Quasi-static folding and deployment of ultra thin composite tape-spring hinges. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 48(1), 187–198 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4732110.2514/1.47321 ↗
27. Melancon, D., Gorissen, B., García-Mora, C.J., Hoberman, C., Bertoldi, K.: Multistable inflatable origami structures at the metre scale. Nature 592, 545–550 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03407-410.1038/s41586-021-03407-4 ↗
28. Miura, K.: Method of packaging and deployment of large membranes. In: Proceedings of the 31st Congress of the International Astronautical Federation IAF-80-A 31. Tokyo, pp. 1–10 (1980)
29. Miura, K., Pellegrino, S.: Forms and Concepts for Lightweight Structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2020)10.1017/9781139048569 ↗
30. NASA. Thin-Films with Integrated Structural and Functional Elements. https://technology.nasa.gov/patent/LAR-TOPS-203 (2015)
31. Okuizumi, N., Yamamoto, T.: Centrifugal deployment of membrane with spiral folding: experiment and simulation. J. Space Eng. 1, 41–50 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1299/spacee.2.4110.1299/spacee.2.41 ↗
32. Papa, A., Pellegrino, S.: Systematically creased thin-film membrane structures. J. Spacecr. Rocket. 45(1), 10–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.1828510.2514/1.18285 ↗
33. Ridenoure, R.W., Munakata, R., Wong, S.D., Diaz, A., Spencer, D.A., Stetson, D.A., Betts, B., Plante, B.A., Foley, J.D., Bellardo, J.M.: Testing the lightsail program: advancing solar sailing technology using a cubesat platform. JoSS 5(2), 531–550 (2016)
34. Schenk, M.: Folded Shell Structures. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (2011)
35. Seefeldt, P.: A stowing and deployment strategy for large membrane space systems on the example of Gossamer-1. Adv. Space Res. 60(6), 1345–1362 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.00610.1016/j.asr.2017.06.006 ↗
36. Shi, F., Wang, Y.: Modelling crease recovery behaviour of woven fabrics. J. Text. Inst. 100, 218–222 (2009)10.1080/00405000701757560 ↗
37. Sickinger, C., Breitbach, E.: Ultra-lightweight deployable space structures. In: 4th International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures. Loughborough, England (2005)
38. Sleight, D., Michii, Y., Lichodziejewski, D., Derbes, B., Mann, T., Slade, K., Wang, J.: Finite element analysis and test correlation of a 10-meter inflation-deployed solar sail. In: 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Austin (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-212110.2514/6.2005-2121 ↗
39. Spencer, D.A., Johnson, L., Long, A.C.: Solar sailing technology challenges. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 93, 105276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.00910.1016/j.ast.2019.07.009 ↗
40. The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, MATLAB version 9.3.0.713579 (R2017b) (2017)
41. Tomohiro, T.: Rigid-foldable thick origami. Origami 5, 253–264 (2011)
42. Wang, W., Qiu, X.: Coupling of creases and shells. J. Appl. Mech. 85(1), 011009 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403847010.1115/1.4038470 ↗
43. Wei, Z.Y., Guo, Z.V., Dudte, L., Liang, H.Y., Mahadevan, L.: Geometric mechanics of periodic pleated origami. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 215501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.21550110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.215501 ↗
44. Wilson, L.: Analysis of Packaging and Deployment of Ultralight Space Structures. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (2017). https://doi.org/10.7907/Z9B27S9610.7907/Z9B27S96 ↗
45. Zhang, L., Dong, K., Lu, M., Zhang, H.: A wrinkling model for pneumatic membranes and the complementarity computational framework. Comput. Mech. 65, 119–134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01755-710.1007/s00466-019-01755-7 ↗
46. Zirbel, S.A., Lang, R.J., Thomson, M.W., Sigel, D.A., Walkemeyer, P.E., Trease, B.P., Magleby, S.P., Howell, L.L.: Accommodating thickness in origami-based deployable arrays. J. Mech. Des. 135(11), 111005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402537210.1115/1.4025372 ↗