Reliability-based optimal tolerance design of mechanical systems including epistemic uncertainty
Source abstract
Abstract
As an essential step of product design, tolerance design plays a critical role in reducing manufacturing costs while ensuring mechanical assemblies’ quality and reliability. However, existing tolerance allocation approaches only are concentrated on design specification constraints during the design stage, although component degradation caused by environmental and operating conditions increases the probability of product failure during the service life. To deal with the degradation effect arising over the service life of mechanical assemblies, this paper proposes a reliability-based tolerance design approach to allocate optimal, reliable tolerances to mechanical systems. The proposed approach rewrites the tolerance allocation problem as a two-objective optimization problem with probabilistic constraints, where time-dependent reliability is incorporated to ensure the product’s reliable and consistent operation during the specified service life. Then, the proposed approach applies the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II and an entropy-based TOPSIS method to obtain the non-dominated optimal tolerances and the best solution, respectively. In addition, unlike previous methods, epistemic uncertainty effects are considered in this work. A modified linear degradation model is developed to include the epistemic uncertainty in the degradation model’s parameters and investigate the effects of uncertainties on reliability.Accordingly, the proposed approach employs a single-loop sampling procedure to incorporate the effects of epistemic uncertainty on the obtained optimal tolerances. Finally, to illustrate the capability of the proposed method, an industrial case study is considered, and the obtained results and performances are compared and discussed.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Technology Assessment and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Armillotta, A.: Selection of parameters in cost-tolerance functions: review and approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108(1), 167–182 (2020)10.1007/s00170-020-05400-z ↗
2. Balamurugan, C., et al.: Concurrent optimal allocation of geometric and process tolerances based on the present worth of quality loss using evolutionary optimisation techniques. Res. Eng. Design 28(2), 185–202 (2017)10.1007/s00163-016-0230-7 ↗
3. Bennett, G., Gupta, L.: Least-cost tolerances—II. Int. J. Prod. Res. 8(2), 169–182 (1970a)10.1080/00207547008929838 ↗
4. Bennett, G., Gupta, L.: Least-cost tolerances—I. Int. J. Prod. Res. 8(1), 65–74 (1970b)10.1080/00207547008929830 ↗
5. Black, J.T., et al.: Materials and Processes in Manufacturing. Prentice-Hall International, Hoboken (1997)
6. Chase, K.W.: Minimum Cost Tolerance Allocation. Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook (1999)
7. Chou, C.-Y., Chang, C.-L.: Minimum-loss assembly tolerance allocation by considering product degradation and time value of money. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 17(2), 139–146 (2001)10.1007/s001700170202 ↗
8. Controzzi, M., Luciani, L.B., Montagnani, F.: Unified approach to bi-directional non-back drivable roller clutch design. Mech. Mach. Theory 116, 433–450 (2017)10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2017.06.010 ↗
9. Deb, K., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
10. Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H., Willis, R.J.: Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 27(10), 963–973 (2000)10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6 ↗
11. Der Kiureghian, A.: Analysis of structural reliability under parameter uncertainties. Probab. Eng. Mech. 23(4), 351–358 (2008)10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.011 ↗
12. Ghaderi, A., Hassani, H., Khodaygan, S.: A Bayesian-reliability based multi-objective optimization for tolerance design of mechanical assemblies. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 213, 107748 (2021)10.1016/j.ress.2021.107748 ↗
13. Hassani, H., Khodaygan, S., Ghaderi, A.: Bayesian reliability-based robust design optimization of mechanical systems under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. In: Engineering Optimization, pp. 1–21 (2022)10.1080/0305215X.2021.2014828 ↗
14. Kapur, K.C.: An approach for development of specifications for quality improvement. Quality Eng. 1(1), 63–77 (1988)10.1080/08982118808962639 ↗
15. Khodaygan, S.: A multiple objective framework for optimal asymmetric tolerance synthesis of mechanical assemblies with degrading components. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100(9), 2177–2205 (2019a)10.1007/s00170-018-2658-6 ↗
16. Khodaygan, S.: An interactive method for computer-aided optimal process tolerance design based on automated decision making. Int. J. Interact. Design Manuf. (IJIDeM) 13(1), 349–364 (2019b)10.1007/s12008-018-0462-z ↗
17. Khodaygan, S.: A multiple objective framework for optimal asymmetric tolerance synthesis of mechanical assemblies with degrading components. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100(9–12), 2177–2205 (2019c)10.1007/s00170-018-2658-6 ↗
18. Khodaygan, S.: Meta-model based multi-objective optimisation method for computer-aided tolerance design of compliant assemblies. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 32(1), 27–42 (2019d)10.1080/0951192X.2018.1543953 ↗
19. Kong, X., Yang, J., Hao, S.: Reliability modeling-based tolerance design and process parameter analysis considering performance degradation. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 207, 107343 (2021)10.1016/j.ress.2020.107343 ↗
20. Li, Y., et al.: Reliability and modal analysis of key meta-action unit for CNC machine tool. IEEE Access 7, 23640–23655 (2019)10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899623 ↗
21. Liu, X., et al.: A modified quality loss model of service life prediction for products via wear regularity. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 204, 107187 (2020)10.1016/j.ress.2020.107187 ↗
22. Liu, X., et al.: Prediction and evaluation of fatigue life considering material parameters distribution characteristic. Int. J. Struct. Integr. 13, 309 (2022a)10.1108/IJSI-11-2021-0118 ↗
23. Liu, X., et al.: Evaluation and prediction of material fatigue characteristics under impact loads: review and prospects. Int. J. Struct. Integr. 13, 251 (2022b)10.1108/IJSI-10-2021-0112 ↗
24. Mao, K., et al.: Reliability analysis for mechanical parts considering hidden cost via the modified quality loss model. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 37(4), 1373–1395 (2021)10.1002/qre.2800 ↗
25. Muthu, P., Dhanalakshmi, V., Sankaranarayanasamy, K.: Optimal tolerance design of assembly for minimum quality loss and manufacturing cost using metaheuristic algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44(11), 1154–1164 (2009)10.1007/s00170-009-1930-1 ↗
26. Nannapaneni, S., Mahadevan, S.: Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 155, 9–20 (2016)10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.005 ↗
27. Peng, H.: Concurrent tolerancing for design and manufacturing based on the present worth of quality loss. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 59(9), 929–937 (2012)10.1007/s00170-011-3542-9 ↗
28. Peng, H., et al.: Optimal tolerance design for products with correlated characteristics by considering the present worth of quality loss. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39(1), 1–8 (2008)10.1007/s00170-007-1205-7 ↗
29. Prabhaharan, G., Ramesh, R., Asokan, P.: Concurrent optimization of assembly tolerances for quality with position control using scatter search approach. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(21), 4959–4988 (2007)10.1080/00207540600596866 ↗
30. Qian, K., et al.: Quality loss prediction of mechanical system life considering linear degeneration and random error. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 37(3), 935–949 (2021)10.1002/qre.2774 ↗
31. Sankararaman, S., Mahadevan, S.: Separating the contributions of variability and parameter uncertainty in probability distributions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 112, 187–199 (2013)10.1016/j.ress.2012.11.024 ↗
32. Sharma, P., Singhal, S.: Implementation of fuzzy TOPSIS methodology in selection of procedural approach for facility layout planning. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 88(5), 1485–1493 (2017)10.1007/s00170-016-8878-8 ↗
33. Spotts, M.F.: Allocation of tolerances to minimize cost of assembly (1973)10.1115/1.3438222 ↗
34. Sutherland, G., Roth, B.: Mechanism design: accounting for manufacturing tolerances and costs in function generating problems (1975)10.1115/1.3438551 ↗
35. Taguchi, G., E.A. Elsayed, and T.C. Hsiang, Quality engineering in production systems. 1989: McGraw-Hill College.
36. Teran, A., Pratt, D.B., Case, K.E.: Present worth of external quality losses for symmetric nominal-is-better quality characteristics. Eng. Econ. 42(1), 39–52 (1996)10.1080/00137919608903168 ↗
37. Wang, S.-J., et al.: Method of reliability tolerance design based on EDA technology and its application on DC hybrid contactor. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 8(3), 426–433 (2007)10.1631/jzus.2007.A0426 ↗
38. Wu, H., et al.: A geometric accuracy analysis and tolerance robust design approach for a vertical machining center based on the reliability theory. Measurement 161, 107809 (2020)10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107809 ↗
39. Zeng, Y., et al.: Tolerance-based reliability and optimization design of switched-mode power supply. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 35(8), 2774–2784 (2019)10.1002/qre.2556 ↗
40. Zhao, Y., Liu, D., Wen, Z.: Optimal tolerance design of product based on service quality loss. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 82(9), 1715–1724 (2016)10.1007/s00170-015-7480-9 ↗