journal article·2010-12

Consistent element coupling in nonlinear static and dynamic analyses using explicit solvers

R. J. Ho, S. A. Meguid, Z. H. Zhu, R. G. Sauvé

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper develops and implements a new constraint formulation for treating nonlinear beam-to-shell, beam-to-solid, and shell-to-solid connections in explicit finite element analyses. The traditional methods commonly adopted to treat element couplings, namely transition elements or multi-point constraints, are investigated and their limitations are outlined and discussed. The newly proposed generalised constraint formulation enforces the kinematical and dynamic consistency across the element coupling interface simultaneously, and a method for implementing them in the explicit central difference integration algorithm is devised. Particular attention is devoted to the treatment of problems involving large rotations and deformations. To validate our constraint method, a number of finite element test cases are examined. Comparison of results of the new method and existing commercial codes against analytical results reveals good accuracy and robustness of the new algorithms in the treatment of both static and dynamic problems encountering large deformations and rotations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Ainsworth, M.: Essential boundary conditions and multi-point constraints in finite element analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(48), 6323–6339 (2001)10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00236-5 ↗
2. Bathe, K.J.: Finite Element Procedures. Prentice Hall, Toronto (1996)
3. Blanco, P.J., Feijoo, R.A., Urquiza, S.A.: A variational approach for coupling kinematically incompatible structural models. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197, 1577–1602 (2008)10.1016/j.cma.2007.12.001 ↗
4. Campbell, J.S.: A penalty function approach to the minimization of quadratic functionals in finite element anlaysis. In: Pulmano, V.A., Kabaila, P.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Finite Element Methods in Engineering, Kensington, Australia, pp. 33–53, (1975)
5. Chang, S.C., Lin, T.W.: Constraint relation implementation for finite element analysis from an element basis. Adv. Eng. Softw. 10(4), 191–194 (1988)10.1016/0141-1195(88)90037-X ↗
6. Chavan, K.S., Wriggers, P.: Consistent coupling of beam and shell models for thermo-elastic analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 59(14), 1861–1878 (2004)10.1002/nme.938 ↗
7. Chen, W.H., Tsai, P.: The combined use of axi-symmetric and solid elements for three dimensional stress analysis. Comput. Struct. 18(4), 689–694 (1984)10.1016/0045-7949(84)90014-2 ↗
8. Cofer, W.F., Will, K.M.: A three-dimensional, shell–solid transition element for general nonlinear analysis. Comput. Struct. 38(4), 449–462 (1991)10.1016/0045-7949(91)90041-J ↗
9. Curiskis, J.I., Valliappan, S.: A solution algorithm for linear constraint equations in finite element analysis. Comput. Struct. 8(1), 117–124 (1978)10.1016/0045-7949(78)90167-0 ↗
10. Dubey, R.N., Sauvé, R.G.: Numerical integration of rate constitutive equations under finite deformation. Nucl. Eng. Des. 135, 249–266 (1992)10.1016/0029-5493(92)90192-X ↗
11. Felippa, C.A.: Iterative procedures for improving penalty function solutions of algebraic systems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 12(5), 821–836 (1978)10.1002/nme.1620120508 ↗
12. Gao D.P., Petyt M.: Transition finite elements for structural dynamic analysis. In: He, G.Q., Cheung, Y.K., (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Finite Element Methods in China, pp. 145-151 (1982)
13. Garusi, E., Tralli, A.: A hybrid stress-assumed transition element for solid-to-beam and plate-to-beam connections. Comput. Struct. 80(2), 105–115 (2002)10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00172-9 ↗
14. Gong, Y.: Local/global structural analysis by transition elements. Comput. Struct. 30(4), 831–836 (1988)10.1016/0045-7949(88)90112-5 ↗
15. Gmür, T.C., Kauten, R.H.: Three-dimensional solid-to-beam transition elements for structural dynamics analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 36, 1429–1444 (1993)10.1002/nme.1620360902 ↗
16. Gmür, T.C., Schorderet, A.M.: A set of three-dimensional solid to shell transition elements for structural dynamics. Comput. Struct. 46(4), 583–591 (1993)10.1016/0045-7949(93)90387-S ↗
17. Hallquist, J.O.: LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual. Livermore Software Technology Corp., California (1998)
18. Hibbit, Karlsson, Sorenson: ABAQUS Theory Manual Version 6.3. HKS Inc., Michigan (2002)
19. Houlsby, G.T., Liu, G., Augarde, C.E.: A tying scheme for imposing displacement constraints in finite element analysis. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 16, 721–732 (2000)10.1002/1099-0887(200010)16:10<721::AID-CNM371>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
20. Hughes, T.J.R., Winget, J.: Finite rotation effects in numerical integration of rate constitutive equations arising in large-deformation analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15(12), 1862–1867 (1980)10.1002/nme.1620151210 ↗
21. Humar, J.L.: Dynamics of Structures. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1990)
22. Kim, H.S., Hong, S.M.: Formulation of transition elements for the analysis of coupled wall structures. Comput. Struct. 57(2), 333–344 (1995)10.1016/0045-7949(94)00620-I ↗
23. Livermore Software Technology: LS-DYNA 970 Keywords Manual. LST Corp., California (2003)
24. McCune, R.W., Armstrong, C.G., Robinson, D.J.: Mixed-dimensional coupling in finite element models. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 49, 725–750 (2000)10.1002/1097-0207(20001030)49:6<725::AID-NME967>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
25. Narayanaswamy, O.S.: Processing nonlinear multipoint constraints in the finite element method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21(7), 1283–1288 (1985)10.1002/nme.1620210708 ↗
26. Park, K.C., Felippa, C.A., Gumaste, U.A.: A localised version of the method of Lagrange multipliers and its applications. Comput. Mech. 24, 476–490 (2000)10.1007/s004660050007 ↗
27. Salonen, E.M.: Iterative penalty function method in structural analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 10(2), 413–421 (1976)10.1002/nme.1620100211 ↗
28. Sauvé, R.G.: H3DMAP Version 6.2, A General Three Dimensional Finite Element Computer Code for Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Structures—User Documentation. Ontario Power Technologies Report No. 181.1-H3DMAP-1998-RA-0001-R00, Toronto, Canada, (1999)
29. Schorderet, A., Gmür, T.C.: Solid to shell transition finite elements for structural dynamics anlaysis. Int. Modal Anal. Conf. 2, 1091–1097 (1991)
30. Shephard, M.S.: Linear multipoint constraints via transformation as part of a direct stiffness assembly process. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 20(11), 2107–2112 (1984)10.1002/nme.1620201112 ↗
31. Shim, K.W., et al.: Mixed dimensional coupling in finite element stress analysis. Eng. Comput. Germany 18, 241–252 (2002)10.1007/s003660200021 ↗
32. Soh, A.K., Soh, C.K., Pey, L.P.: On the compatibility conditions for modeling tubular joints using different types of elements. Comput. Struct. 62(5), 935–942 (1997)10.1016/0045-7949(95)00324-X ↗
33. Surana, K.S.: Transition finite elements for three-dimensional stress analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 15(7), 991–1020 (1980)10.1002/nme.1620150704 ↗
34. Surana, K.S.: Geometrically non-linear formulation for the three dimensional solid–shell transition finite elements. Comput. Struct. 15(5), 549–566 (1982)10.1016/0045-7949(82)90007-4 ↗
35. Surana, K.S.: Geometrically nonlinear formulation for the axi-symmetric transition finite elements. Comput. Struct. 17(2), 243–255 (1983)10.1016/0045-7949(83)90013-5 ↗
36. Tsai, P., Chen, W.H.: The combination of different type elements using a Lagrangian multiplier technique for static and dynamic structural analysis. Comput. Struct. 21(3), 493–500 (1985)10.1016/0045-7949(85)90127-0 ↗
37. Wang, J., Min, X., Zou, J.: A dof expanding method for connecting solid and shell element. Commun. Appl. Numer. Methods 12, 321–330 (1996)10.1002/(SICI)1099-0887(199606)12:6<321::AID-CNM974>3.0.CO;2-R ↗