Hyperelastic constitutive model parameters identification using optical-based techniques and hybrid optimisation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper we propose a new optical-based technique to identify the constitutive relation coefficients of the hyperelastic material using a hybrid optimisation approach. This technique can be used in place of traditional mechanical testing of elastomers for applications that involve inhomogeneous deformation. The purpose of the proposed method is to identify the incompressible hyperelastic material constitutive relation coefficients using a single experiment under different loading cases. The method comprises sample surface 3D reconstruction and uses finite element simulations to replicate the experiments, and uses a hybrid optimisation technique to minimise the error between actual 3D deformations and FE simulation results. The proposed hybrid technique predicts the hyperelastic constitutive relation coefficients more accurately than other optimisation methods. This study introduces a novel approach by employing a subpixel image registration algorithm for 3D reconstruction. The method requires a single experiment with diverse loading cases to accurately determine the coefficients of hyperelastic constitutive relations. The setup is portable and can be accommodated in a small suitcase. For this purpose, an apparatus was constructed comprising a stereoscopic system with eight cameras and a six-degree-of-freedom force-torque sensor to measure the induced forces and torques during the experiments. We identified the constitutive relation coefficients of Ogden N1, Ogden N3, Yeoh, and Arruda-Boyce relations which are commonly used models for silicone materials, using a traditional uniaxial test, optical uniaxial test (experiments performed using a constructed optical system), and inhomogeneous deformations tests. The study demonstrated that the coefficients obtained from inhomogeneous deformation tests provided the most accurate FE predictions. It was also shown that hyperelastic constitutive relation coefficients obtained from traditional uniaxial tests are insufficient to describe the material behaviour when the material undergoes inhomogeneous deformations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Amin, A.F.M.S., Lion, A., Sekita, S., Okui, Y.: Nonlinear dependence of viscosity in modeling the rate-dependent response of natural and high damping rubbers in compression and shear: Experimental identification and numerical verification. Int. J. Plast. 22(9), 1610–1657 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPLAS.2005.09.00510.1016/J.IJPLAS.2005.09.005 ↗
2. Anssari-Benam, A.: On a new class of non-Gaussian molecular-based constitutive models with limiting chain extensibility for incompressible rubber-like materials. Math. Mech. Solids. 26(11), 1660–1674 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081286521100109410.1177/10812865211001094 ↗
3. Arruda, E.M., Boyce, M.C.: A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41(2), 389–412 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-610.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6 ↗
4. Avanzini, A., Battini, D.: Integrated experimental and numerical comparison of different approaches for planar biaxial testing of a hyperelastic material. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/601412910.1155/2016/6014129 ↗
5. Bergström, J.: Elasticity/Hyperelasticity. In: Mechanics of Solid Polymers, pp. 209–307. William Andrew Publishing, Norwich (2015)10.1016/B978-0-323-31150-2.00005-4 ↗
6. Boehler, J.P., Demmerle, S., Koss, S.: A new direct biaxial testing machine for anisotropic materials. Exp. Mech. 34(1), 1–9 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0232843510.1007/BF02328435 ↗
7. Boyce, M.C., Arruda, E.M.: Constitutive models of rubber elasticity: a review. Rubber Chem. Technol. 73(3), 504–523 (2000). https://doi.org/10.5254/1.354760210.5254/1.3547602 ↗
8. Bustamante, R., Rajagopal, K.R.: A new type of constitutive equation for nonlinear elastic bodies Fitting with experimental data for rubber-like materials. Proc. R. Soc. A 477(2252), 20210330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPA.2021.033010.1098/RSPA.2021.0330 ↗
9. Cai, Y., Sun, P., Zhu, H., Rabczuk, T.: A mixed cover meshless method for elasticity and fracture problems. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 95, 73–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.01110.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.011 ↗
10. Chang, T.Y.P., Saleeb, A.F., Li, G., Chang, T.Y.P., Saleeb, A.F., Li, G.: Large strain analysis of rubber-like materials based on a perturbed Lagrangian variational principle. CompM 8(4), 221–233 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0057737610.1007/BF00577376 ↗
11. Dai, Z., Ren, H., Zhuang, X., Rabczuk, T.: Dual-support smoothed particle hydrodynamics for elastic Mechanics. Int. J. Comput. Methods 14(04), 1750039 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987621750039610.1142/S0219876217500396 ↗
12. Dal, H., Açıkgöz, K., Badienia, Y.: On the performance of isotropic Hyperelastic constitutive models for rubber-like materials: a state of the art review. Appl. Mech. Rev. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.405097810.1115/1.4050978 ↗
13. Deb, K., Goel, T.: Controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms for better convergence. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (Incl. Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinf.) 1993, 67–81 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_510.1007/3-540-44719-9_5 ↗
14. Dobrynin, A.V., Carrillo, J.M.Y.: Universality in nonlinear elasticity of biological and polymeric networks and gels. Macromolecules 44(1), 140–146 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/MA102154U10.1021/MA102154U ↗
15. Elsayed, Y., et al.: Finite element analysis and design optimization of a pneumatically actuating silicone module for robotic surgery applications. Soft Robot. 1(4), 255–262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.001610.1089/soro.2014.0016 ↗
16. Firouzi, N.: Mechanics of nonlinear visco-hyperelastic-hysteresis membranes. Int. J. Non. Linear. Mech. 147, 104231 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.10423110.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2022.104231 ↗
17. Firouzi, N., Żur, K.K.: On the generalised nonlinear mechanics of compressible, incompressible, isotropic, and anisotropic hyperelastic membranes. Int. J. Solids Struct. 264, 112088 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.11208810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.112088 ↗
18. Gamage, T.P.B., Rajagopal, V., Ehrgott, M., Nash, M.P., Nielsen, P.M.F.: Identification of mechanical properties of heterogeneous soft bodies using gravity loading. Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng. 27(3), 391–407 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/CNM.142910.1002/CNM.1429 ↗
19. HajiRassouliha, A.: A toolbox for precise and robust deformation measurement [Doctoral thesis, The University of Auckland]. The University of Auckland Research Space (2017). https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/35955
20. HajiRassouliha, A., Babarenda Gamage, T.P., Parker, M.D., Nash, M.P., Taberner, A.J., & Nielsen, P.M.F.: 3D surface profiling using arbitrarily positioned cameras. In: 2013 28th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ 2013) (2013)10.1109/IVCNZ.2013.6727068 ↗
21. HajiRassouliha, A., Taberner, A.J., Nash, M.P., Nielsen, P.M.F.: Subpixel phase-based image registration using Savitzky-Golay differentiators in gradient-correlation. Comput. vis. Image Underst. 170, 28–39 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2017.11.00310.1016/j.cviu.2017.11.003 ↗
22. Han, S.P.: A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 22(3), 297–309 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0093285810.1007/BF00932858 ↗
23. He, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, L., Li, F.: A comparative study of 85 hyperelastic constitutive models for both unfilled rubber and highly filled rubber nanocomposite material. Nano Mater. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOMS.2021.07.00310.1016/J.NANOMS.2021.07.003 ↗
24. Ho, L.V., Trinh, T.T., De Roeck, G., Bui-Tien, T., Nguyen-Ngoc, L., Abdel Wahab, M.: An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. Eng. Fail. Anal. 131, 105866 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10586610.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105866 ↗
25. Kim, B., et al.: A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for Chloroprene rubber. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 13(5), 759–764 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y10.1007/s12541-012-0099-y ↗
26. Kim, S., Jung, C.L., Jung, Y., Moon, H., Lim, H.: Biomimetic skin-type shear sensor. Int. Conf. Control. Autom. Syst. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2016.783248410.1109/ICCAS.2016.7832484 ↗
27. Külcü, I.D.: A hyperelastic constitutive model for rubber-like materials. Arch. Appl. Mech. 90(3), 615–622 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00419-019-01629-710.1007/S00419-019-01629-7 ↗
28. Lee, C., et al.: Soft robot review. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 15(1), 3–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-016-0462-310.1007/s12555-016-0462-3 ↗
29. Madireddy, S., Sista, B., Vemaganti, K.: A Bayesian approach to selecting hyperelastic constitutive models of soft tissue. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 291, 102–122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMA.2015.03.01210.1016/J.CMA.2015.03.012 ↗
30. Makinde, A., Thibodeau, L., Neale, K.W.: Development of an apparatus for biaxial testing using cruciform specimens. Exp. Mech. 32(2), 138–144 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0232472510.1007/BF02324725 ↗
31. Martins, P.A.L.S., Jorge, R.M.N., Ferreira, A.J.M.: A comparative study of several material models for prediction of hyperelastic properties: application to silicone-rubber and soft tissues. Strain 42(3), 135–147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x ↗
32. Martins, P.A.L.S., Natal Jorge, R.M., Ferreira, A.J.M.: A comparative study of several material models for prediction of hyperelastic properties: application to silicone-rubber and soft tissues. Strain 42(3), 135–147 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2006.00257.x ↗
33. Minh, H.-L., Sang-To, T., Khatir, S., Abdel Wahab, M., Cuong-Le, T.: Damage identification in high-rise concrete structures using a bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimisation algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 176, 103399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10339910.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103399 ↗
34. Nasab, A.M., Sabzehzar, A., Tatari, M., Majidi, C., Shan, W.: A soft gripper with rigidity tunable elastomer strips as ligaments. Soft Robot. 4(4), 411–420 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1089/SORO.2016.0039/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FIGURE8.JPEG10.1089/SORO.2016.0039/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/FIGURE8.JPEG ↗
35. Nathanson, M.H., Saidel, G.M.: Multiple-objective criteria for optimal experimental design: application to ferrokinetics. Am. J. Physiol. 248(3), R378–R386 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPREGU.1985.248.3.R37810.1152/AJPREGU.1985.248.3.R378 ↗
36. Nguyen, B.H., Zhuang, X., Wriggers, P., Rabczuk, T., Mear, M.E., Tran, H.D.: Isogeometric symmetric Galerkin boundary element method for three-dimensional elasticity problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 323, 132–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.01110.1016/j.cma.2017.05.011 ↗
37. Nguyen-Thanh, V.M., Anitescu, C., Alajlan, N., Rabczuk, T., Zhuang, X.: Parametric deep energy approach for elasticity accounting for strain gradient effects. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 386, 114096 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11409610.1016/j.cma.2021.114096 ↗
38. Nguyen-Thanh, N., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Bordas, S.P.A., Rabczuk, T.: Isogeometric analysis using polynomial splines over hierarchical T-meshes for two-dimensional elastic solids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200(21–22), 1892–1908 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.01.01810.1016/j.cma.2011.01.018 ↗
39. Nguyen-Thanh, V.M., Zhuang, X., Rabczuk, T.: A deep energy method for finite deformation hyperelasticity. Eur. J. Mech. A Solids 80, 103874 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.10387410.1016/j.euromechsol.2019.103874 ↗
40. Payne, T., Mitchell, S., Bibb, R., Waters, M.: The evaluation of new multi-material human soft tissue simulants for sports impact surrogates. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 41, 336–356 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.01810.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.018 ↗
41. Ranzani, T., Gerboni, G., Cianchetti, M., Menciassi, A.: A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. Bioinspir. Biomim. 10(3), 035008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/10/3/03500810.1088/1748-3190/10/3/035008 ↗
42. Rao, M.R., Satayanarayana, P.M.R.S.: On the behaviour of hyperelastic materials, a Mooney-Riviln approach. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 7(3) (2019) Accessed from 04 Oct 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijert.org
43. Roberts, P., Damian, D. D., Shan, W., Lu, T., Majidi, C.: Soft-matter capacitive sensor for measuring shear and pressure deformation. In: Proc. - IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., pp. 3529–3534, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.663107110.1109/ICRA.2013.6631071 ↗
44. Sang-To, T., Hoang-Le, M., Wahab, M.A., Cuong-Le, T.: An efficient planet optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 8362 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12030-w10.1038/s41598-022-12030-w ↗
45. Sang-To, T., Le-Minh, H., Abdel Wahab, M., Thanh, C.-L.: A new metaheuristic algorithm: Shrimp and Goby association search algorithm and its application for damage identification in large-scale and complex structures. Adv. Eng. Softw. 176, 103363 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10336310.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103363 ↗
46. Sareh, S et al.: Bio-inspired tactile sensor sleeve for surgical soft manipulators. In: Proceedings - IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, pp. 1454–1459, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2014.690704310.1109/ICRA.2014.6907043 ↗
47. Sarkar, D., Dasgupta, S., Reddy, S.N., Arora, A., Sen, S.: A soft bending-type actuator using hyper-elastic materials: development, analysis and characterisation. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 1–7, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3352593.335266810.1145/3352593.3352668 ↗
48. Sasso, M., Palmieri, G., Chiappini, G., Amodio, D.: Characterisation of hyperelastic rubber-like materials by biaxial and uniaxial stretching tests based on optical methods. Polym. Test. 27(8), 995–1004 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2008.09.00110.1016/J.POLYMERTESTING.2008.09.001 ↗
49. Schittkowski, K.: NLQPL: a FORTRAN-subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 5, 485–500 (1985)10.1007/BF02739235 ↗
50. Shahzad, M., Kamran, A., Siddiqui, M.Z., Farhan, M.: Mechanical characterisation and FE modelling of a hyperelastic material. Mater. Res. 18(5), 918–924 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-1439.32041410.1590/1516-1439.320414 ↗
51. Shivapooja, P., et al.: Dynamic surface deformation of silicone elastomers for management of marine biofouling: laboratory and field studies using pneumatic actuation. Biofouling 31(3), 265–274 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2015.103565110.1080/08927014.2015.1035651 ↗
52. Smooth-On (n.d.) Ecoflex 00-50. Retrieved from https://www.smooth-on.com/products/ecoflex-00-50/
53. Sorooshian, S., Arfi, F., Sorooshian, S., Arfi, F.: Response Surface parameter sensitivity analysis methods for postcalibration studies. WRR 18(5), 1531–1538 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018I005P0153110.1029/WR018I005P01531 ↗
54. Sparks, J.L., et al.: Use of silicone materials to simulate tissue biomechanics as related to deep tissue injury. Adv. Ski. Wound Care 28(2), 59–68 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000460127.47415.6e10.1097/01.ASW.0000460127.47415.6e ↗
55. Standard Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Elastomers—Tension. https://www.astm.org/d0412-16r21.html Accessed from 07 Jun 2022
56. Steinmann, P., Hossain, M., Possart, G.: Hyperelastic models for rubber-like materials: consistent tangent operators and suitability for Treloar’s data. Arch. Appl. Mech. 82(9), 1183–1217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00419-012-0610-Z10.1007/S00419-012-0610-Z ↗
57. Tobajas, R., Ibartz, E., Gracia, L.: A comparative study of hyperelastic constitutive models to characterize the behavior of a polymer used in automotive engines. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Materials, MDPI, Basel, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ecm-2-A00210.3390/ecm-2-A002 ↗
58. Tran, V.-T., Nguyen, T.-K., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Abdel Wahab, M.: Vibration and buckling optimisation of functionally graded porous microplates using BCMO-ANN algorithm. Thin-Walled Struct. 182, 110267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.11026710.1016/j.tws.2022.110267 ↗
59. Ultimaker 2+ 3D printer. https://ultimaker.com/3d-printers/ultimaker-2-plus-connect Accessed from 10 Feb 2022
60. Voyiadjis, G.Z., Oucif, C., Kattan, P.I., Rabczuk, T.: Damage and healing mechanics in plane stress, plane strain, and isotropic elasticity. Int. J. Damage Mech. 29(8), 1246–1270 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/105678952090534710.1177/1056789520905347 ↗
61. Yap, H.K., Lim, J.H., Nasrallah, F., Cho Hong Goh, J., Yeow, C.-H.: Characterisation and evaluation of soft elastomeric actuators for hand assistive and rehabilitation applications. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 40(4), 199–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2016.116185310.3109/03091902.2016.1161853 ↗
62. Zhang, X., et al.: Adjustable compliance soft sensor via an elastically inflatable fluidic dome. Sensors 21, 1970 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/S2106197010.3390/S21061970 ↗
63. Zhao, Z., Mu, X., Du, F.: Modeling and verification of a new Hyperelastic model for rubber-like materials. Math. Probl. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/283205910.1155/2019/2832059 ↗