A new radial basis function active learning method based on distance constraint for structural reliability analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Strongly nonlinear structural systems exhibit high computational errors when dependability is calculated using conventional approaches such as the primary second-order method of moments and the secondary second-order method of moments. The combination of the proxy model and Monte Carlo simulation is an effective method to solve the structural failure probability problem. However, existing studies on the active learning methods of proxy models for reliability calculation mainly focus on the kriging model, while for radial basis interpolation, the existing research results are relatively few. Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes to combine the cross-validation method with multiple kernel functions to evaluate the uncertainty at the prediction points. The mathematical expression of the active learning function considering three factors is proposed: the linear combination of the distance from the surface of limit state and the uncertainty of the predicted value of the proxy model as the optimization objective function, and the distance between the sample to be selected and the initial sample point as the constraint condition. Meanwhile, using the idea of the penalty function, the constrained problem is transformed into the unconstrained problem to get the final active learning function PLF. Finally, the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the PRBFM method are verified by classical cases and compared with other methods. It provides a new method and a new idea for the reliability analysis of complex structures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Aute, V., Saleh, K., Abdelaziz, O., Azarm, S., Radermacher, R.: Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for Kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48(3), 581–605 (2013)10.1007/s00158-013-0918-5 ↗
2. Aute, V., Abd ElAziz, O., Azarm, S., Radermacher, R.: Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for deterministic computer simulations. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, p. 6067 (2008)10.2514/6.2008-6067 ↗
3. Basudhar, A., Missoum, S., Sanchez, A.H.: Limit state function identification using support vector machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains. Probab. Eng. Mech. 23(1), 1–11 (2008)10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.08.004 ↗
4. Ben Salem, M., Roustant, O., Gamboa, F., Tomaso, L.: Universal prediction distribution for surrogate models. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 5(1), 1086–1109 (2017)10.1137/15M1053529 ↗
5. Bichon, B.J., Eldred, M.S., Swiler, L.P., Mahadevan, S., McFarland, J.M.: Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions. AIAA J. 46(10), 2459–2468 (2008)10.2514/1.34321 ↗
6. Bourinet, J.-M.: Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 150, 210–221 (2016)10.1016/j.ress.2016.01.023 ↗
7. Bourinet, J.-M., Deheeger, F., Lemaire, M.: Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines. Struct. Saf. 33(6), 343–353 (2011)10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.06.001 ↗
8. Cernuschi, F., et al.: Solid particle erosion of thermal spray and physical vapour deposition thermal barrier coatings. Wear 271(11–12), 2909–2918 (2011)10.1016/j.wear.2011.06.013 ↗
9. Chau, M., Han, X., Bai, Y., Jiang, C.: A structural reliability analysis method based on radial basis function. Comput. Mater. Contin. 27(2), 128 (2012)
10. Chau, M., Han, X., Jiang, C., Bai, Y., Tran, T., Truong, V.: An efficient PMA-based reliability analysis technique using radial basis function. Eng. Comput. 31(6), 1098–1115 (2014)10.1108/EC-04-2012-0087 ↗
11. Chen, W., Fu, Z.-J., Chen, C.-S.: Recent Advances in Radial Basis Function Collocation Methods. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Berlin (2014)10.1007/978-3-642-39572-7 ↗
12. Cheng, J., Li, Q., Xiao, R.-C.: A new artificial neural network-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis. Probab. Eng. Mech. 23(1), 51–63 (2008)10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.003 ↗
13. Deng, J.: Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43(11–12), 3255–3291 (2006)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.055 ↗
14. Deng, J., Gu, D., Li, X., Yue, Z.Q.: Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network. Struct. Saf. 27(1), 25–48 (2005)10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.004 ↗
15. Duan, L., Xiao, N.-C., Hu, Z., Li, G., Cheng, A.: An efficient lightweight design strategy for body-in-white based on implicit parameterization technique. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 55(5), 1927–1943 (2017)10.1007/s00158-016-1621-0 ↗
16. Echard, B., Gayton, N., Lemaire, M.: AK-MCS: an active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct. Saf. 33(2), 145–154 (2011)10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002 ↗
17. Echard, B., Gayton, N., Lemaire, M., Relun, N.: A combined importance sampling and kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 111, 232–240 (2013)10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.008 ↗
18. Golzari, A., Sefat, M.H., Jamshidi, S.: Development of an adaptive surrogate model for production optimization. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 133, 677–688 (2015)10.1016/j.petrol.2015.07.012 ↗
19. Holland, F.A., Jr.: A simple method for estimating the parameters of the Beta distribution applied to modeling uncertainty in gas turbine inlet temperature. Turbo Expo. Power Land Sea Air 36096, 627–633 (2002)
20. Jing, Z., Chen, J., Li, X.: RBF-GA: an adaptive radial basis function metamodeling with genetic algorithm for structural reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 189, 42–57 (2019)10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.005 ↗
21. Keshtegar, B., Chakraborty, S.: A hybrid self-adaptive conjugate first order reliability method for robust structural reliability analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 53, 319–332 (2018)10.1016/j.apm.2017.09.017 ↗
22. Kleijnen, J.P., Beers, W.V.: Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodelling. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 55(8), 876–883 (2004)10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601747 ↗
23. Nicholls, J., Deakin, M., Rickerby, D.: A comparison between the erosion behaviour of thermal spray and electron beam physical vapour deposition thermal barrier coatings. Wear 233, 352–361 (1999)10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00214-8 ↗
24. Pan, Q., Dias, D.: An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo simulation. Struct. Saf. 67, 85–95 (2017)10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.04.006 ↗
25. Pech, K.H., Downing, N.L.: Development of a retracting vane/centrifugal main fuel pump for gas turbine engines. J. Fluids Eng. 98(4), 619–625 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.344842710.1115/1.3448427 ↗
26. Shi, L., Sun, B., Ibrahim, D.S.: An active learning reliability method with multiple kernel functions based on radial basis function. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 60(1), 211–229 (2019)10.1007/s00158-019-02210-0 ↗
27. Thurn, G., Schneider, G., Bahr, H.-A., Aldinger, F.: Toughness anisotropy and damage behavior of plasma sprayed ZrO2 thermal barrier coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 123(2–3), 147–158 (2000)10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00528-9 ↗
28. Timko, L.P.: Energy Efficient Engine High Pressure Turbine Component Test Performance Report. Contractor Report (CR) (1984)
29. Viana, F.A., Haftka, R.T., Steffen, V.: Multiple surrogates: how cross-validation errors can help us to obtain the best predictor. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 39(4), 439–457 (2009)10.1007/s00158-008-0338-0 ↗
30. Xiao, N.-C., Zuo, M.J., Zhou, C.: A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 169, 330–338 (2018a)10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.008 ↗
31. Xiao, N.-C., Zuo, M.J., Guo, W.: Efficient reliability analysis based on adaptive sequential sampling design and cross-validation. Appl. Math. Model. 58, 404–420 (2018b)10.1016/j.apm.2018.02.012 ↗
32. Yang, X., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Gao, Z.: An active learning kriging model for hybrid reliability analysis with both random and interval variables. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 51(5), 1003–1016 (2015)10.1007/s00158-014-1189-5 ↗
33. Yun, W., Lu, Z., Jiang, X.: A modified importance sampling method for structural reliability and its global reliability sensitivity analysis. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 57(4), 1625–1641 (2018)10.1007/s00158-017-1832-z ↗
34. Zhan, H., Xiao, N.-C., Ji, Y.: An adaptive parallel learning dependent Kriging model for small failure probability problems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 222, 108403 (2022)10.1016/j.ress.2022.108403 ↗
35. Zhang, Z., Jiang, C.: Evidence-theory-based structural reliability analysis with epistemic uncertainty: a review. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 63(6), 2935–2953 (2021)10.1007/s00158-021-02863-w ↗