journal article·2014-09

Sequential approximate robust design optimization using radial basis function network

Satoshi Kitayama, Koetsu Yamazaki

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper proposes a sequential approximate robust design optimization (SARDO) with the radial basis function (RBF) network. In RDO, the mean and the standard deviation of objective should be minimized simultaneously. Therefore, the RDO is generally formulated as bi-objective design optimization. Our goal is to find a robust optimal solution with a small number of function evaluations, not identifying a set of Pareto-optimal solution using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms. The weighted sum is often used to find a robust optimal solution. In contrast, the weighted lp norm method is used in this paper. Through illustrative examples, some validations of the weighted lp norm method to the RDO are clarified. Next, SARDO with the RBF network is discussed. In general, the standard deviation of functions is obtained by using the finite difference method. Thus, in order to obtain the standard deviation of functions, the finite difference method is directly applied to the response surface. High accuracy of the finite difference method will leads to highly accurate robust optimal solution. In order to avoid the inaccurate numerical calculation, the standard deviation is expressed by only the Gaussian kernel. As the result, it is expected that a highly accurate robust optimal solution can be found with a small number of function evaluations. Through numerical examples, the validity of the proposed approach is examined. Finally, the variable blank holder force trajectory for reducing springback is examined.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Chen, W., Allen, J.K., Tsui, K.L., Mistree, F.: A procedure for robust design: minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors. J. Mech. Des. 118, 478–485 (1996)10.1115/1.2826915 ↗
2. Chen, W., Wiecek, M.M., Zhang, J.: Quality utility—a compromise programming approach to robust design. J. Mech. Des. 121, 179–187 (1999)10.1115/1.2829440 ↗
3. Chen, W., Fu, W., Biggers, S.B., Latour, R.A.: An affordable approach for robust design of thick laminated composite structure. Optim. Eng. 1, 305–322 (2000)10.1023/A:1010078107194 ↗
4. Choi, J.H., Lee, W.H., Park, J.J., Youn, B.D.: A study on robust design optimization of layered plate bonding process considering uncertainties. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 35, 531–540 (2008)10.1007/s00158-007-0153-z ↗
5. Gao, Y., Wang, X.: An effective warpage optimization method in injection molding based on the Kriging model. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 37, 953–960 (2008)10.1007/s00170-007-1044-6 ↗
6. Govindaluri, S.M., Cho, B.R.: Robust design modeling with correlated quality characteristics using multicriteria decision framework. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 32, 423–433 (2007)10.1007/s00170-005-0349-6 ↗
7. Hillmann, M., Kubli, W.: Optimization of sheet metal forming processes using simulation programs. In: NUMISHEET’99, Beasnc, France, 1999, vol. 1, pp. 287–292
8. Hu, J., Peng, Y., Li, D., Yin, J.: Robust optimization based on knowledge discovery from metal forming simulation. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 187–188, 698–701 (2007)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.070 ↗
9. Jakumeit, J., Herdy, M., Nitsche, M.: Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 29, 498–507 (2005)10.1007/s00158-004-0455-3 ↗
10. Jiang, C., Han, X., Liu, G.R., Li, G.Y.: The optimization of the variable binder force in U-shaped forming with uncertain friction coefficient. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 182, 262–267 (2007)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.08.002 ↗
11. Kitayama, S., Arakawa, M., Yamazaki, K.: Sequential approximate optimization using radial basis function network for engineering optimization. Optim. Eng. 12(4), 535–557 (2011)10.1007/s11081-010-9118-y ↗
12. Kitayama, S., Kita, K., Yamazaki, K.: Optimization of variable blank holder force trajectory by sequential approximate optimization with RBF network. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 61(9–12), 1067–1083 (2012)10.1007/s00170-011-3755-y ↗
13. Kitayama, S., Srirat, J., Arakawa, M., Yamazaki, K.: Sequential approximate multi-objective optimization using radial basis function network. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 48(3), 501–515 (2013)
14. Kovach, J., Cho, B.R.: Constrained robust design experiments and optimization with the consideration of uncontrollable factors. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 38, 7–18 (2008)10.1007/s00170-007-1082-0 ↗
15. Lee, K.H., Park, G.J.: Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables. Comput. Struct. 79, 77–86 (2001)10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00117-6 ↗
16. Lee, S.W., Yang, D.Y.: An assessment of numerical parameters influencing springback in explicit finite element analysis of sheet metal forming process. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 80–81, 60–67 (1998)
17. Lee, I., Choi, K.K., Du, L., Gorsich, D.: Dimension reduction method for reliability-based robust design optimization. Comput. Struct. 86, 1550–1562 (2008)10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.05.020 ↗
18. Li, C., Wang, F.L., Chang, Y.Q., Liu, Y.: A modified global optimization method based on surrogate model and its application in packing profile optimization of injection molding process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48, 505–511 (2010)10.1007/s00170-009-2302-6 ↗
19. Liu, G., Lin, Z., Xu, W., Bao, Y.: Variable blank holder force in U-shaped part forming for eliminating springback error. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 120, 259–264 (2002)10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01110-4 ↗
20. Martin, J.D., Simpson, T.W.: Use of Kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models. AIAA J. 43(4), 853–863 (2005)10.2514/1.8650 ↗
21. Messac, A., Yahaya, A.I.: Multiobjective robust design using physical programming. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 23, 357–371 (2002)10.1007/s00158-002-0196-0 ↗
22. Nakayama, H., Arakawa, M., Sasaki, R.: Simulation-based optimization using computational intelligence. Optim. Eng. 3, 201–214 (2002)10.1023/A:1020971504868 ↗
23. Papeleux, L., Ponthot, J.P.: Finite element simulation of springback in sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125–126, 785–791 (2002)10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00393-X ↗
24. Park, G.J., Lee, T.H., Hwang, K.H.: Robust design: an overview. AIAA J. 44(1), 181–191 (2006)10.2514/1.13639 ↗
25. Robinson, T.J., Borror, C.M., Myers, R.: Robust parameter design: a review. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 20, 81–101 (2004)10.1002/qre.602 ↗
26. Shi, H., Gao, Y., Wang, X.: Optimization of injection molding process parameters using integrated artificial neural network model and expected improvement function method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 48, 955–962 (2010)10.1007/s00170-009-2346-7 ↗
27. Shimoyama, K., Lim, J.N., Jeong, S., Obayashi, S., Koishi, M.: Practical implementation of robust design assisted by response surface approximation and visual data-mining. J. Mech. Des. 131, 061007-1–061007-11 (2009)10.1115/1.3125207 ↗
28. Shin, S., Samanlioglu, F., Cho, B.R., Wiecek, M.M.: Computing trade-offs in robust design: perspectives of the mean squared error. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60, 248–255 (2011)10.1016/j.cie.2010.11.006 ↗
29. Simpson, T.W., Mauery, T.M., Korte, J.J., Mistree, F.: Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J. 39(12), 2233–2241 (2001)10.2514/2.1234 ↗
30. Su, J., Renaud, J.E.: Automatic differentiation in robust optimization. AIAA J. 35(6), 1072–1079 (1997)10.2514/3.13628 ↗
31. Tang, Y., Chen, J.: Robust design of sheet metal forming process based on adaptive importance sampling. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 39, 531–544 (2009)10.1007/s00158-008-0343-3 ↗
32. Wang, G.G., Shan, S.: Review of metamodeling techniques in support of engineering design optimization. J. Mech. Des. 129, 370–380 (2007)10.1115/1.2429697 ↗
33. Wang, H., Li, E., Li, G.Y.: Optimization of drawbead design in sheet metal forming based on intelligent sampling by using response surface methodology. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 206, 45–55 (2008)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.019 ↗
34. Wang, H., Li, E., Li, G.Y.: The least square support vector regression coupled with parallel sampling scheme metamodeling technique and application in sheet forming optimization. Mater. Des. 30, 1468–1479 (2009)10.1016/j.matdes.2008.08.014 ↗
35. Wang, H., Li, E., Li, G.Y.: Parallel boundary and best neighbor searching sampling algorithm for drawbead design optimization in sheet metal forming. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 41, 309–324 (2010)10.1007/s00158-009-0411-3 ↗
36. Xu, W.L., Ma, C.H., Li, C.H., Feng, W.J.: Sensitive factors in springback simulation for sheet metal forming. J. Mater. Technol. 151, 217–222 (2004)10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.044 ↗
37. Zang, C., Friswell, M.I., Mottershead, J.E.: A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Comput. Struct. 83, 315–326 (2005)10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.10.007 ↗
38. Zhang, J., Wiecek, M.M., Chen, W.: Local approximation of the efficient frontier in robust design. J. Mech. Des. 122, 232–236 (2000)10.1115/1.533571 ↗