Smart structural framework for energy harvesting using auxetic metamaterial-embedded flex-tensional piezoelectric bridges
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Adhikari, J., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Angular poling effect on cymbal piezoelectric structure using rhombohedral and tetragonal PMN-0.33PT for energy harvesting applications. Appl. Phys. A (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05512-110.1007/s00339-022-05512-1 ↗
2. Adhikari, J., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Influence of material grading and compositional platinum profile on the functionally graded piezoelectric bridge structure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater des Appl 237, 1026–1041 (2023a). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420722113310310.1177/14644207221133103 ↗
3. Adhikari, J., Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Performance enhancement of functionally graded piezoelectric tile by tailoring poling orientation. Mech. Based des. Struct. Mach. 51, 3759–3778 (2023b). https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2021.193904710.1080/15397734.2021.1939047 ↗
4. Ali, M.N., Rehman, I.U.: An Auxetic structure configured as oesophageal stent with potential to be used for palliative treatment of oesophageal cancer; development and in vitro mechanical analysis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 22, 2573–2581 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4436-y10.1007/s10856-011-4436-y ↗
5. Aloui, R., Larbi, W., Chouchane, M.: Global sensitivity analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesters. Compos. Struct. 228, 111317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11131710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111317 ↗
6. Balamurugan, V., Narayanan, S.A.: piezolaminated composite degenerated shell finite element for active control of structures with distributed piezosensors and actuators. Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 035031 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03503110.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035031 ↗
7. Budarapu, P.R., Sudhir Sastry, Y.B., Natarajan, R.: Design concepts of an aircraft wing: composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 10, 394–408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z ↗
8. Byrne C.: Sequential Optimization. Iterative Optim Inverse Probl 2018:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16485-510.1201/b16485-5 ↗
9. Chen, K., Gao, Q., Fang, S., Zou, D., Yang, Z., Liao, W.H.: An auxetic nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester for enhancing efficiency and bandwidth. Appl. Energy 298, 117274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11727410.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117274 ↗
10. Chen, K., Fang, S., Gao, Q., Zou, D., Cao, J., Liao, W.H.: Enhancing power output of piezoelectric energy harvesting by gradient auxetic structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008201510.1063/5.0082015 ↗
11. Daniels, A., Zhu, M., Design, T.A.: analysis and testing of a piezoelectric flex transducer for harvesting bio-kinetic energy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 476, 012047 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/01204710.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012047 ↗
12. Eghbali, P., Younesian, D., Farhangdoust, S.: Enhancement of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting with auxetic boosters. Int. J. Energy Res. 44, 1179–1190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.501010.1002/er.5010 ↗
13. Erturun, U., Eisape, A., West, J.E.: Design and analysis of a vibration energy harvester using push-pull electrostatic conversion. Smart Mater. Struct. 29(10), 105018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aba5e210.1088/1361-665X/aba5e2 ↗
14. Farhangdoust, S., Georgeson, G., Ihn, J.B., Chang, F.K.: Kirigami auxetic structure for high efficiency power harvesting in self-powered and wireless structural health monitoring systems. Smart Mater. Struct. 30, 015037 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abcaaf10.1088/1361-665X/abcaaf ↗
15. Farhangdoust, S., Georgeson, G., Ihn, J.B.: MetaMembranes for the sensitivity enhancement of wearable piezoelectric metasensors. Sensors (Basel) 22, 1909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2205190910.3390/s22051909 ↗
16. Ferguson, W.J.G., Kuang, Y., Evans, K.E., Smith, C.W., Zhu, M.: Auxetic structure for increased power output of strain vibration energy harvester. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 282, 90–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.01910.1016/j.sna.2018.09.019 ↗
17. Gao, Q., Liao, W.H., Wang, L.: On the low-velocity impact responses of auxetic double arrowed honeycomb. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 98, 105698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.10569810.1016/j.ast.2020.105698 ↗
18. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Rabczuk, T.: A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 313, 239–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.02910.1016/j.cma.2016.09.029 ↗
19. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Rabczuk, T.: A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 332, 47–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.00510.1016/j.cma.2017.12.005 ↗
20. Hamdia, K.M., Ghasemi, H., Bazi, Y., AlHichri, H., Alajlan, N., Rabczuk, T.: A novel deep learning based method for the computational material design of flexoelectric nanostructures with topology optimization. Finite Elem. Anal. des. 165, 21–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.07.00110.1016/j.finel.2019.07.001 ↗
21. Introduction to Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting. Piezoelectric Energy Harvest., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011, p. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119991151.ch110.1002/9781119991151.ch1 ↗
22. Jamil, W.N.M., Aripin, M.A., Sajuri, Z., Abdullah, S., Omar, M.Z., Abdullah, M.F., et al.: Mechanical properties and microstructures of steel panels for laminated composites in armoured vehicles. Int J Automot Mech Eng 13, 3741–3753 (2016)
23. Jasim, A., Wang, H., Yesner, G., Safari, A., Maher, A.: Optimized design of layered bridge transducer for piezoelectric energy harvesting from roadway. Energy 141, 1133–1145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.00510.1016/j.energy.2017.10.005 ↗
24. Kim, H.W., Batra, A., Priya, S., Uchino, K., Markley, D., Newnham, R.E., Hofmann, H.F.: Energy harvesting using a piezoelectric “cymbal” transducer in dynamic environment. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43(9R), 6178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.617810.1143/JJAP.43.6178 ↗
25. Ko, J., Bhullar, S., Cho, Y., Lee, P.C., Byung-Guk, J.M.: Design and fabrication of auxetic stretchable force sensor for hand rehabilitation. Smart Mater. Struct. 24, 075027 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/7/07502710.1088/0964-1726/24/7/075027 ↗
26. Kumar, S., Singh, D., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: No-wear vibration energy harvester based on a triboelectric mechanism. J. Electron. Mater. 50, 7057–7070 (2021)10.1007/s11664-021-09208-9 ↗
27. Leinonen, M., Palosaari, J., Juuti, J., Jantunen, H.: Combined electrical and electromechanical simulations of a piezoelectric cymbal harvester for energy harvesting from walking. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 25, 391–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1350057310.1177/1045389X13500573 ↗
28. Li, Q., Kuang, Y., Zhu, M.: Auxetic piezoelectric energy harvesters for increased electric power output. AIP Adv. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497431010.1063/1.4974310 ↗
29. McEwen, H.M.J., Barnett, P.I., Bell, C.J., Farrar, R., Auger, D.D., Stone, M.H., et al.: The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 38, 357–365 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.01510.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.015 ↗
30. Mo, C., Arnold, D., Kinsel, W.C., Clark, W.W.: Modeling and experimental validation of unimorph piezoelectric cymbal design in energy harvesting. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24, 828–836 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1246345910.1177/1045389X12463459 ↗
31. Rao SS. Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons 2019.10.1002/9781119454816 ↗
32. Safaei, M., Sodano, H.A., Anton, S.R.: A review of energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials: state-of-the-art a decade later (2008–2018). Smart Mater. Struct. 28(11), 113001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab36e410.1088/1361-665X/ab36e4 ↗
33. Singh, A., Mukhopadhyay, T., Adhikari, S., Bhattacharya, B.: Voltage-dependent modulation of elastic moduli in lattice metamaterials: Emergence of a programmable state-transition capability. Int. J. Solids Struct. 208–209, 31–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.009 ↗
34. To I. IntroductionToCOMSOLMultiphysics 2019:1–214.
35. Yesner, G., Jasim, A., Wang, H., Basily, B., Maher, A., Safari, A.: Energy harvesting and evaluation of a novel piezoelectric bridge transducer. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 285, 348–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.11.01310.1016/j.sna.2018.11.013 ↗
36. Yokouchi, T., Kagawa, F., Hirschberger, M., Otani, Y., Nagaosa, N., Tokura, Y.: Emergent electromagnetic induction in a helical-spin magnet. Nature 586, 232–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2775-x10.1038/s41586-020-2775-x ↗
37. Zhang, L.B., Dai, H.L., Yang, Y.W., Wang, L.: Design of high-efficiency electromagnetic energy harvester based on a rolling magnet. Energy Convers Manag 185, 202–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.08910.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.089 ↗