journal article·2025-12

Smart structural framework for energy harvesting using auxetic metamaterial-embedded flex-tensional piezoelectric bridges

Amit Pandey, Jitendra Adhikari, Diwakar Singh, Vikas Narain, Rajeev Kumar

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Adhikari, J., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Angular poling effect on cymbal piezoelectric structure using rhombohedral and tetragonal PMN-0.33PT for energy harvesting applications. Appl. Phys. A (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05512-110.1007/s00339-022-05512-1 ↗
2. Adhikari, J., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Influence of material grading and compositional platinum profile on the functionally graded piezoelectric bridge structure. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater des Appl 237, 1026–1041 (2023a). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420722113310310.1177/14644207221133103 ↗
3. Adhikari, J., Kumar, A., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: Performance enhancement of functionally graded piezoelectric tile by tailoring poling orientation. Mech. Based des. Struct. Mach. 51, 3759–3778 (2023b). https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2021.193904710.1080/15397734.2021.1939047 ↗
4. Ali, M.N., Rehman, I.U.: An Auxetic structure configured as oesophageal stent with potential to be used for palliative treatment of oesophageal cancer; development and in vitro mechanical analysis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 22, 2573–2581 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4436-y10.1007/s10856-011-4436-y ↗
5. Aloui, R., Larbi, W., Chouchane, M.: Global sensitivity analysis of piezoelectric energy harvesters. Compos. Struct. 228, 111317 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11131710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111317 ↗
6. Balamurugan, V., Narayanan, S.A.: piezolaminated composite degenerated shell finite element for active control of structures with distributed piezosensors and actuators. Smart Mater. Struct. 17, 035031 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/3/03503110.1088/0964-1726/17/3/035031 ↗
7. Budarapu, P.R., Sudhir Sastry, Y.B., Natarajan, R.: Design concepts of an aircraft wing: composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 10, 394–408 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z10.1007/s11709-016-0352-z ↗
8. Byrne C.: Sequential Optimization. Iterative Optim Inverse Probl 2018:45–54. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16485-510.1201/b16485-5 ↗
9. Chen, K., Gao, Q., Fang, S., Zou, D., Yang, Z., Liao, W.H.: An auxetic nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester for enhancing efficiency and bandwidth. Appl. Energy 298, 117274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.11727410.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117274 ↗
10. Chen, K., Fang, S., Gao, Q., Zou, D., Cao, J., Liao, W.H.: Enhancing power output of piezoelectric energy harvesting by gradient auxetic structures. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008201510.1063/5.0082015 ↗
11. Daniels, A., Zhu, M., Design, T.A.: analysis and testing of a piezoelectric flex transducer for harvesting bio-kinetic energy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 476, 012047 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/01204710.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012047 ↗
12. Eghbali, P., Younesian, D., Farhangdoust, S.: Enhancement of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting with auxetic boosters. Int. J. Energy Res. 44, 1179–1190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/er.501010.1002/er.5010 ↗
13. Erturun, U., Eisape, A., West, J.E.: Design and analysis of a vibration energy harvester using push-pull electrostatic conversion. Smart Mater. Struct. 29(10), 105018 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aba5e210.1088/1361-665X/aba5e2 ↗
14. Farhangdoust, S., Georgeson, G., Ihn, J.B., Chang, F.K.: Kirigami auxetic structure for high efficiency power harvesting in self-powered and wireless structural health monitoring systems. Smart Mater. Struct. 30, 015037 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/abcaaf10.1088/1361-665X/abcaaf ↗
15. Farhangdoust, S., Georgeson, G., Ihn, J.B.: MetaMembranes for the sensitivity enhancement of wearable piezoelectric metasensors. Sensors (Basel) 22, 1909 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2205190910.3390/s22051909 ↗
16. Ferguson, W.J.G., Kuang, Y., Evans, K.E., Smith, C.W., Zhu, M.: Auxetic structure for increased power output of strain vibration energy harvester. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 282, 90–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.01910.1016/j.sna.2018.09.019 ↗
17. Gao, Q., Liao, W.H., Wang, L.: On the low-velocity impact responses of auxetic double arrowed honeycomb. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 98, 105698 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.10569810.1016/j.ast.2020.105698 ↗
18. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Rabczuk, T.: A level-set based IGA formulation for topology optimization of flexoelectric materials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 313, 239–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.02910.1016/j.cma.2016.09.029 ↗
19. Ghasemi, H., Park, H.S., Rabczuk, T.: A multi-material level set-based topology optimization of flexoelectric composites. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 332, 47–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.12.00510.1016/j.cma.2017.12.005 ↗
20. Hamdia, K.M., Ghasemi, H., Bazi, Y., AlHichri, H., Alajlan, N., Rabczuk, T.: A novel deep learning based method for the computational material design of flexoelectric nanostructures with topology optimization. Finite Elem. Anal. des. 165, 21–30 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.07.00110.1016/j.finel.2019.07.001 ↗
21. Introduction to Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting. Piezoelectric Energy Harvest., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011, p. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119991151.ch110.1002/9781119991151.ch1 ↗
22. Jamil, W.N.M., Aripin, M.A., Sajuri, Z., Abdullah, S., Omar, M.Z., Abdullah, M.F., et al.: Mechanical properties and microstructures of steel panels for laminated composites in armoured vehicles. Int J Automot Mech Eng 13, 3741–3753 (2016)
23. Jasim, A., Wang, H., Yesner, G., Safari, A., Maher, A.: Optimized design of layered bridge transducer for piezoelectric energy harvesting from roadway. Energy 141, 1133–1145 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.00510.1016/j.energy.2017.10.005 ↗
24. Kim, H.W., Batra, A., Priya, S., Uchino, K., Markley, D., Newnham, R.E., Hofmann, H.F.: Energy harvesting using a piezoelectric “cymbal” transducer in dynamic environment. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43(9R), 6178 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.43.617810.1143/JJAP.43.6178 ↗
25. Ko, J., Bhullar, S., Cho, Y., Lee, P.C., Byung-Guk, J.M.: Design and fabrication of auxetic stretchable force sensor for hand rehabilitation. Smart Mater. Struct. 24, 075027 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/7/07502710.1088/0964-1726/24/7/075027 ↗
26. Kumar, S., Singh, D., Kumar, R., Jain, S.C.: No-wear vibration energy harvester based on a triboelectric mechanism. J. Electron. Mater. 50, 7057–7070 (2021)10.1007/s11664-021-09208-9 ↗
27. Leinonen, M., Palosaari, J., Juuti, J., Jantunen, H.: Combined electrical and electromechanical simulations of a piezoelectric cymbal harvester for energy harvesting from walking. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 25, 391–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1350057310.1177/1045389X13500573 ↗
28. Li, Q., Kuang, Y., Zhu, M.: Auxetic piezoelectric energy harvesters for increased electric power output. AIP Adv. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497431010.1063/1.4974310 ↗
29. McEwen, H.M.J., Barnett, P.I., Bell, C.J., Farrar, R., Auger, D.D., Stone, M.H., et al.: The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 38, 357–365 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.01510.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.015 ↗
30. Mo, C., Arnold, D., Kinsel, W.C., Clark, W.W.: Modeling and experimental validation of unimorph piezoelectric cymbal design in energy harvesting. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24, 828–836 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1246345910.1177/1045389X12463459 ↗
31. Rao SS. Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons 2019.10.1002/9781119454816 ↗
32. Safaei, M., Sodano, H.A., Anton, S.R.: A review of energy harvesting using piezoelectric materials: state-of-the-art a decade later (2008–2018). Smart Mater. Struct. 28(11), 113001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab36e410.1088/1361-665X/ab36e4 ↗
33. Singh, A., Mukhopadhyay, T., Adhikari, S., Bhattacharya, B.: Voltage-dependent modulation of elastic moduli in lattice metamaterials: Emergence of a programmable state-transition capability. Int. J. Solids Struct. 208–209, 31–48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.00910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.10.009 ↗
34. To I. IntroductionToCOMSOLMultiphysics 2019:1–214.
35. Yesner, G., Jasim, A., Wang, H., Basily, B., Maher, A., Safari, A.: Energy harvesting and evaluation of a novel piezoelectric bridge transducer. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 285, 348–354 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.11.01310.1016/j.sna.2018.11.013 ↗
36. Yokouchi, T., Kagawa, F., Hirschberger, M., Otani, Y., Nagaosa, N., Tokura, Y.: Emergent electromagnetic induction in a helical-spin magnet. Nature 586, 232–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2775-x10.1038/s41586-020-2775-x ↗
37. Zhang, L.B., Dai, H.L., Yang, Y.W., Wang, L.: Design of high-efficiency electromagnetic energy harvester based on a rolling magnet. Energy Convers Manag 185, 202–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.08910.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.089 ↗