Significance of GPR polarisation for improving target detection and characterisation
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper focuses on the application of ground penetrating radar (GPR) technique for civil engineering purposes, addressing the issues related to wave polarisation and antennas geometry. Even if polarisation of GPR signal is often an underestimated feature during data analysis and post processing, detection or avoidance of a specific target can be managed handling its polarimetric response. This opportunity is of high importance in this field of application, where the mixture of target with different polarimetric response is a commonly encountered situation. To provide an insight of this, two multicomponent GPR surveys have been performed: a first survey to show the effect of antenna-target mutual alignment variation and a second experiment in which the benefits of acquiring with different antenna arrangements are clearly evident. Because each antenna arrangement is sensitive towards different features of the received wavefield, this strategy is able to discriminate targets depending on their geometrical shape, thus delivering better detailed image of the acquired area.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis · Underwater Acoustics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1049/PBRA015E10.1049/PBRA015E ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.01610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.016 ↗
3. 10.12989/cac.2014.13.3.38910.12989/cac.2014.13.3.389 ↗
4. 10.12989/sem.2013.46.4.53310.12989/sem.2013.46.4.533 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.00110.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.001 ↗
6. 10.1117/12.46221510.1117/12.462215 ↗
7. Binda L · Adv Archit · 2005 · 20 · 599
8. Binda L · Int J Mater Struct Integrity · 2011 · 5 · 110.1504/IJMSI.2011.039043 ↗
9. 10.1139/L07-14310.1139/L07-143 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.03.01010.1016/j.ndteint.2004.03.010 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.46226010.1117/12.462260 ↗
12. LualdiM, ZanziL, SosioG. A 3D GPR survey methodology for archaeological applications. Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2006 June 19–22;Columbus, OH (USA); 2006.
13. LualdiM, ZanziL. 2D and 3D experiments to explore the potential benefit of GPR investigations in planning the mining activity of a limestone quarry. Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2004 June 21–24;Delft, NL; 2004.
14. 10.4133/1.292348610.4133/1.2923486 ↗
15. 10.1109/67.84902110.1109/67.849021 ↗
16. LualdiM, BindaL, ZanziL. Acquisition and processing requirements for high quality 3D reconstructions from GPR investigations. Proceedings of International Symposium on Non Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering; 2003 September 16–19;NDT-C, Berlin, DE; 2003.
17. 10.4133/1.292320510.4133/1.2923205 ↗
18. BalanisCA. Antenna theory: analysis and design. New York (NY): Wiley; 1982.
19. BeckmannP. The depolarization of electromagnetic waves. Vol. 1. Boulder: Golem Press; 1968.
20. BalanisCA. Advanced engineering electromagnetics. New York (NY): Wiley; 1989.
21. 10.1029/1999GL00836510.1029/1999GL008365 ↗
22. 10.4133/1.292277010.4133/1.2922770 ↗
23. 10.1029/2000GL00851210.1029/2000GL008512 ↗
24. 10.1109/TGRS.2006.88345910.1109/TGRS.2006.883459 ↗
25. Van der KrukJ, ZeemanJH, GroenenboomJ. Multicomponent imaging of different objects with different strike orientation. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar; 2002 April 29–May 2; Santa Barbara, CA (USA); 2002.10.1117/12.462281 ↗
26. 10.1109/TGRS.2011.216341310.1109/TGRS.2011.2163413 ↗
27. 10.1190/1.159811610.1190/1.1598116 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0926-9851(00)00023-910.1016/S0926-9851(00)00023-9 ↗
29. 10.4133/JEEG1.2.13910.4133/JEEG1.2.139 ↗
30. Roberts RL. Analysis of theoretical modeling of GPR polarization phenomena [dissertation]. Columbus (OH): The Ohio State University;1994.
31. 10.1109/36.92744410.1109/36.927444 ↗
32. Hyoung-sunY, EvansM, KobashigawaJ, IskanderM. Advanced classification of UXO using fully polarimetric GPR and frequency-polarization features. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS); 2010 July 25–30; Honolulu, HI (USA); 2010.10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5650332 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.01310.1016/j.ndteint.2013.07.013 ↗
34. 10.1109/36.48511410.1109/36.485114 ↗
35. 10.1190/1.175946610.1190/1.1759466 ↗
36. 10.1190/1.978156080158010.1190/1.9781560801580 ↗
37. LualdiM. True 3D acquisition using GPR over small areas: A cost effective solution. Proceedings of 16th Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems; 2011 April 10–14; Charleston, SC (USA); 2011.10.4133/1.3614176 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.01.00110.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.01.001 ↗
39. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.234.8410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.234.84 ↗
40. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.602-604.158310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.602-604.1583 ↗