In-situ test of pedestrian landscape bridge for benchmark SHM model towards smart city
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study is to establish a structural health monitoring (SHM) benchmark model for urban pedestrian bridges. It is generally recognised that urban pedestrian bridges are often considered as landscape and landmark structures. However, it should be noted that these bridges are more likely to be subjected to pedestrian loads than traditional vehicle loads. These demand a great deal of attention from the maintenance department. It is also useful to set up a monitoring benchmark model of the bridge to help manage traffic in this study, it is appropriate to propose a holistic strategy for the full-scale test of pedestrian landscape bridge. Study indicates that the case bridge operates within its elastic working state, with structural stiffness and strength meeting design and code requirements, demonstrating favourable dynamic performance. It can be concluded that the strategy employing water bags and pedestrians for testing yields satisfactory results. A bridge monitoring system will be considered, and when there is a significant increase in monitoring data, measures such as restricting pedestrian traffic and installing signage to guide local residents and traffic around the bridge will be considered, which plays an important role in the building of smart city.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanyang Institute of Technology
Henan University of Technology
Zhejiang University
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power
Funding
Key Research Projects of Colleges and Universities of Henan Province
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/land1404068110.3390/land14040681 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scs.2017.12.03210.1016/j.scs.2017.12.032 ↗
3. Lyu CW. Sustainable smart city in the United States: citizen-centered collaboration and value creation in urban transformations [PhD thesis]. University of La Verne; 2022.
4. 10.1080/10168664.2018.147748110.1080/10168664.2018.1477481 ↗
5. 10.1260/1369-4332.13.5.86110.1260/1369-4332.13.5.861 ↗
6. 10.1002/stab.20200006810.1002/stab.202000068 ↗
7. Zhu GC, Xu WP, Xu JF. Design of pedestrian landscape flying-bird arch bridge with cable-stayed cable and Lissajous curved arch rib. In: E3S Web of Conferences, December 2020, ARFEE 2020; 2021. Vol. 237. p. 04024. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202123704024
8. Namhee KH, Hyun-Moo K, Sung-Gul H. Exploration of cable-supported pedestrian bridges. In: Proceedings of the 20th congress of IABSE; New York (USA); 2019. doi: 10.2749/newyork.2019.2007
9. 10.1080/10168664.2021.191161010.1080/10168664.2021.1911610 ↗
10. Chen SJ. Static load test and analysis of a streamlined landscape pedestrian bridge. J Jilin Jianzhu Univ. 2018;35(6):21–25+33.
11. Wu ZA. Static load test study and bearing capacity evaluation of pedestrian bridge—arch-beam composite steel bridge. J Taiyuan Univ Technol. 2020;51(2):277–283.
12. Li J. The dynamic performance and vibration experimental research with people of the pedestrian bridge [master thesis]. Xi’an China: Xi’an University of Technology; 2017.
13. Liu ZP. Study on the vertical vibration of footbridge considering the interaction between human and structure [master thesis]. Zhengzhou China: North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power; 2018.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.00008210.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000082 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10968710.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109687 ↗
16. Guan JC. Vibration comfort analysis and TMD control of long-span pedestrian bridge under wind crowd load coupling [master thesis]. Suzhou China: Suzhou University of Science and Technology; 2020.
17. Xian JH, He JF, Zhu SC, et al. A study on wind resistance of steel arch pedestrian bridge. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Building, Civil Engineering and Smart City; Guilin, China; 2022.
18. 10.48295/et.2020.77.710.48295/et.2020.77.7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13578910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135789 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10530610.1016/j.autcon.2024.105306 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11419010.1016/j.measurement.2024.114190 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11053210.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110532 ↗
23. CCCC Highway Consultants CO. LTD. JTG D60–2015 general specifications for design of highway bridges and culverts (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Transport of China; 2015.
24. Beijing Municipal Engineering Research Institute. CJJ 69–95 technical specifications of urban pedestrian overcrossing and underpass (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Construction of China; 1996.
25. Shanghai municipal engineering design and research institute. In: CJJ 11-2011 code for design of the municipal bridge (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Construction of China; 2012.
26. China Academy of Building Science, Guangdong Academy of Building Science. CJJ/T 233–2015 technical code for test and evaluation of city bridges (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Construction of China; 2016.
27. Chang’an University. JTG/T J21–01–2015 load test methods for highway bridges (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Transport of China; 2016.
28. Technical specifications of urban pedestrian overcrossing and underpass China code (exposure draft to be published).
29. Fu B. Experimental analysis and research on the mechanical behavior of steel box girder pedestrian bridge [master thesis]. Nanchang China: East China Jiaotong University; 2020.
30. Highway Science Research Institute, Ministry of Transport. JTG/T J21–2011 specification for inspection and evaluation of load-bearing capacity of highway bridges (China code). Beijing, China: Ministry of Transport of China; 2011.