journal article·2024-04Open access

Prediction of shear behavior of glass FRP bars-reinforced ultra-highperformance concrete I-shaped beams using machine learning

Asif Ahmed, Md Nasir Uddin, Muhammad Akbar, Rania Salih, Mohammad Arsalan Khan, Hossein Bisheh, Timon Rabczuk

Abstract

Abstract This study focuses on using various machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the shear behaviors of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars. The main objective of the study is to predict the shear strength of UHPC beams reinforced with GFRP bars using ML models. We use four different ML models: support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (R.F.), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The experimental database used in the study is acquired from various literature sources and comprises 54 test observations with 11 input features. These input features are likely parameters related to the composition, geometry, and properties of the UHPC beams and GFRP bars. To ensure the ML models' generalizability and scalability, random search methods are utilized to tune the hyperparameters of the algorithms. This tuning process helps improve the performance of the models when predicting the shear strength. The study uses the ACI318M-14 and Eurocode 2 standard building codes to predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams. The ML models' predictions are compared to the results obtained from these building code standards. According to the findings, the XGBoost model demonstrates the highest predictive test performance among the investigated ML models. The study employs the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to assess the significance of each input parameter in the ML models' predictive capabilities. A Taylor diagram is used to statistically compare the accuracy of the ML models. This study concludes that ML models, particularly XGBoost, can effectively predict the shear capacity behavior of GFRP bars-reinforced UHPC I-shaped beams.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (75)

Show source-provided references
1. Abuodeh, O.R., Abdalla, J.A., Hawileh, R.A.: Assessment of compressive strength of ultra-high performance concrete using deep machine learning techniques. Appl. Soft Comput. 95, 106552 (2020)10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106552 ↗
2. Akbar, M., Hussain, Z., Huali, Z., Imran, M., Thomas, B.S.: Impact of waste crumb rubber on concrete performance incorporating silica fume and fly ash to make a sustainable low carbon concrete. Struct. Eng. Mech. 85, 275–287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2023.85.2.27510.12989/sem.2023.85.2.275 ↗
3. An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10586610.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105866 ↗
4. Arciszewski, T., et al.: Machine learning in transportation engineering: a feasibility study. Appl. Artif. Intell. Int. J. 8(1), 109–124 (1994)10.1080/08839519408945434 ↗
5. Ashour, S.A., Hasanain, G.S., Wafa, F.F.: Shear behavior of high-strength fiber reinforced concrete beams. Struct. J. 89(2), 176–184 (1992)
6. Audet, L.-A., Desmarais, M., Gosselin, É.: Handling missing data through prevention strategies in self-administered questionnaires: a discussion paper. Nurse Res. 30(2), 1 (2022)
7. Awad, M., Khanna, R.: Support vector regression. In: Efficient Learning Machines, pp. 67–80. Springer, Cham (2015)10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_4 ↗
8. Aydin, Z.E., Ozturk, Z.K.: Performance analysis of XGBoost classifier with missing data. Manch. J. Artif. Intell. Appl. Sci. (MJAIAS) 2(02), 2021 (2021)
9. Bahij, S., et al.: Numerical investigation of the shear behavior of reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete beams. Struct. Concr. 19(1), 305–317 (2018)10.1002/suco.201700062 ↗
10. Chakraborty, H., Gu, H.: A Mixed Model Approach for Intent-to-Treat Analysis in Longitudinal Clinical Trials with Missing Values. RTI Press, Triangle Park (2019)
11. Chen, X., et al.: Experimental studies and microstructure analysis for ultra high-performance reactive powder concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 229, 116924 (2019)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116924 ↗
12. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2016)10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
13. Chenggong, C., Qing, W., Pinggen, S., Hao, Z., Muhammad, A., Shiliang, M.: Study on diffusion of oxygen in coral concrete under different preloads. Constr. Build. Mater. 319, 126147 (2022)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126147 ↗
14. Dai, Y., et al.: A novel machine learning model to predict the moment capacity of cold-formed steel channel beams with edge-stiffened and un-stiffened web holes. J. Build. Eng. 53, 104592 (2022)10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104592 ↗
15. Dang, B.-L., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Wahab, M.A.: An effective approach for VARANS-VOF modelling interactions of wave and perforated breakwater using gradient boosting decision tree algorithm. Ocean Eng. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.11339810.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113398 ↗
16. Elsayed, M., et al.: Shear behaviour of ultra-high performance concrete beams with openings. In: Structures. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2022)
17. Emmanuel, T., et al.: A survey on missing data in machine learning. J. Big Data 8(1), 1–37 (2021)10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9 ↗
18. Enders, C.K.: Applied Missing Data Analysis. Guilford Publications, New York (2022)
19. Farouk, A.I.B., Jinsong, Z.: Prediction of interface bond strength between ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and normal strength concrete (N.S.C) using a machine learning approach. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 47(4), 5337–5363 (2022)10.1007/s13369-021-06433-6 ↗
20. Farouk, A.I.B., et al.: Prediction and uncertainty quantification of ultimate bond strength between UHPC and reinforcing steel bar using a hybrid machine learning approach. Constr. Build. Mater. 345, 128360 (2022)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128360 ↗
21. Fei, Y., Wu, W., Ma, H., Yin, A.M.: Study on anti-corrosion performance of composite modified magnesium ammonium phosphate cement-based coatings. J. Build. Eng. 71, 106423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10642310.1016/j.jobe.2023.106423 ↗
22. Fu, B., Feng, D.-C.: A machine learning-based time-dependent shear strength model for corroded reinforced concrete beams. J. Build. Eng. 36, 102118 (2021)10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102118 ↗
23. Ghafari, E., et al.: Design of UHPC using artificial neural networks. In: Brittle Matrix Composites 10, pp. 61–69. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)10.1533/9780857099891.61 ↗
24. Graybeal, B.A.: Structural behavior of ultra-high performance concrete prestressed I-girders. United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure, Washington, DC (2006)
25. Graybeal, B., et al.: International perspective on UHPC in bridge engineering. J. Bridge Eng. 25(11), 04020094 (2020)10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001630 ↗
26. Guo, P., et al.: Predicting mechanical properties of high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites by integrating micromechanics and machine learning. Materials 14(12), 3143 (2021)10.3390/ma14123143 ↗
27. Hu, T., Li, G.: Machine learning-based model in predicting the plate-end debonding of FRP-strengthened RC beams in flexure. Adv. Civil Eng. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/606987110.1155/2022/6069871 ↗
28. Jiang, C.-S., Liang, G.-Q.: Modeling shear strength of medium-to ultra-high-strength concrete beams with stirrups using S.V.R. and genetic algorithm. Soft Comput. 25(16), 10661–10675 (2021)10.1007/s00500-021-06027-2 ↗
29. Jin, L.-Z., et al.: Shear strength of fibre-reinforced reactive powder concrete I-shaped beam without stirrups. Mag. Concr. Res. 72(21), 1112–1124 (2020)10.1680/jmacr.18.00525 ↗
30. Lee, C., et al.: Shear strength of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) precast bridge joint. In: High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites 6, pp. 413–420. Springer, Cham (2012)10.1007/978-94-007-2436-5_50 ↗
31. Li, Z., Gao, X., Lu, D.: Correlation analysis and statistical assessment of early hydration characteristics and compressive strength for multi-composite cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 310, 125260 (2021)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125260 ↗
32. Li, Z., et al.: Estimation of bond strength between UHPC and reinforcing bars using machine learning approaches. Eng. Struct. 262, 114311 (2022)10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114311 ↗
33. Liao, J., et al.: Design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). Constr. Build. Mater. 318, 126200 (2022)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126200 ↗
34. Little, R.J., Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, vol. 793. Wiley, Hoboken (2019)
35. Liu, Y., et al.: Development of ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete (UHPGC): influence of steel fiber on mechanical properties. Cement Concr. Compos. 112, 103670 (2020)10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103670 ↗
36. Liu, T., et al.: Machine-learning-based models to predict shear transfer strength of concrete joints. Eng. Struct. 249, 113253 (2021)10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113253 ↗
37. Ly, H.-B., et al.: Computational hybrid machine learning based prediction of shear capacity for steel fiber reinforced concrete beams. Sustainability 12(7), 2709 (2020)10.3390/su12072709 ↗
38. Marani, A., Jamali, A., Nehdi, M.L.: Predicting ultra-high-performance concrete compressive strength using tabular generative adversarial networks. Materials 13(21), 4757 (2020)10.3390/ma13214757 ↗
39. Melhem, H.G., Cheng, Y.: Prediction of remaining service life of bridge decks using machine learning. J. Comput. Civil Eng. 17(1), 1–9 (2003)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2003)17:1(1) ↗
40. Memon, S.M., Wamala, R., Kabano, I.H.: Missing data analysis using statistical and machine learning methods in facility-based maternal health records. SN Comput. Sci. 3(5), 1–15 (2022)10.1007/s42979-022-01249-z ↗
41. Mészöly, T., Randl, N.: Shear behavior of fiber-reinforced ultra-high performance concrete beams. Eng. Struct. 168, 119–127 (2018)10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.075 ↗
42. Nazabal, A., et al.: Handling incomplete heterogeneous data using vaes. Pattern Recogn. 107, 107501 (2020)10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107501 ↗
43. Nematollahi, B., et al.: A review on ultra high performance’ductile’concrete (UHPdC) technology. Int. J. Civil Struct. Eng. 2(3), 994 (2012)
44. Nguyen, D.H., Wahab, M.A.: Damage detection in slab structures based on two-dimensional curvature mode shape method and Faster R-CNN. Adv. Eng. Softw. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.10337110.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103371 ↗
45. Nielsen, M.P., Hoang, L.C.: Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity. CRC Press, New York (2016)10.1201/b10432 ↗
46. Qi, J.N., et al.: Post-cracking shear strength and deformability of HSS-UHPFRC beams. Struct. Concr. 17(6), 1033–1046 (2016)10.1002/suco.201500191 ↗
47. Raheem, A.H.A., Mahdy, M., Mashaly, A.A.: Mechanical and fracture mechanics properties of ultra-high-performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 213, 561–566 (2019)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.298 ↗
48. Rahman, J., et al.: Data-driven shear strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams using machine learning approach. Eng. Struct. 233, 111743 (2021)10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111743 ↗
49. Resplendino, J.: Ultra high performance concrete: new AFGC recommendations. In: Designing and Building with UHPFRC, pp. 713–722. Wiley, Hoboken (2011)10.1002/9781118557839.ch47 ↗
50. Salem, N.M., Deifalla, A.: Evaluation of the strength of slab-column connections with F.R.P.s using machine learning algorithms. Polymers 14(8), 1517 (2022)10.3390/polym14081517 ↗
51. Sarothi, S.Z., et al.: Predicting bearing capacity of double shear bolted connections using machine learning. Eng. Struct. 251, 113497 (2022)10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113497 ↗
52. Schmidt, M., Fehling, E.: Ultra-high-performance concrete: research, development and application in Europe. ACI Spec. Publ 228(1), 51–78 (2005)
53. Schratz, P., et al.: Hyperparameter tuning and performance assessment of statistical and machine-learning algorithms using spatial data. Ecol. Model. 406, 109–120 (2019)10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.06.002 ↗
54. Silva, M.A., Rodrigues, C.C.: Size and relative stiffness effects on compressive failure of concrete columns wrapped with glass F.R.P. J. Mater. Civil Eng. 18(3), 334–342 (2006)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(334) ↗
55. Simwanda, L., et al.: Structural reliability of ultra high-performance fibre reinforced concrete beams in shear. Struct. Concr. 24(2), 2862–2878 (2022)10.1002/suco.202200342 ↗
56. Somer, E., Gische, C., Miočević, M.: Methods for modeling autocorrelation and handling missing data in mediation analysis in single case experimental designs (SCEDs). Eval. Health Prof. 45(1), 36–53 (2022)10.1177/01632787211071136 ↗
57. Su, M., et al.: Identification of the interfacial cohesive law parameters of FRP strips externally bonded to concrete using machine learning techniques. Eng. Fract. Mech. 247, 107643 (2021)10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107643 ↗
58. Sun, J., et al.: Machine-learning-aided prediction of flexural strength and A.S.R expansion for waste glass cementitious composite. Appl. Sci. 11(15), 6686 (2021)10.3390/app11156686 ↗
59. Tian, H., et al.: Experimental investigation on axial compressive behavior of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) filled glass F.R.P. tubes. Constr. Build. Mater. 225, 678–691 (2019)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.204 ↗
60. Tran, V.-T., Nguyen, T.-K., Nguyen-Xuan, H., Wahab, M.A.: Vibration and buckling optimization of functionally graded porous microplates using BCMO-ANN algorithm. Thin-Walled Struct. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.11026710.1016/j.tws.2022.110267 ↗
61. Uchida, Y. et al.: Outlines of 'recommendations for design and construction of ultra high strength fiber reinforced concrete structures' by JSCE. In: Proceedings Intnetnational Workshop on High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Composites in Structural Applications, Citeseer (2005)
62. Umar, T., Yousaf, M., Akbar, M., Abbas, N.: An experimental study on non-destructive evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of a sustainable concrete incorporating industrial waste. Materials 15, 7346 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1520734610.3390/ma15207346 ↗
63. Wakjira, T.G., et al.: Explainable machine learning model and reliability analysis for flexural capacity prediction of R.C. beams strengthened in flexure with FRCM. Eng. Struct. 255, 113903 (2022a)10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113903 ↗
64. Wakjira, T.G., et al.: Shear capacity prediction of FRP-RC beams using single and ensenble explainable machine learning models. Compos. Struct. 287, 115381 (2022b)10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115381 ↗
65. Wang, Z., et al.: A machine-learning-based model for predicting the effective stiffness of precast concrete columns. Eng. Struct. 260, 114224 (2022)10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114224 ↗
66. Wei, R., et al.: Missing value imputation approach for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics data. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–10 (2018)
67. Wu, D., Zhang, H., Yang, Y.: Deep learning-based crack monitoring for ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). J. Adv. Transp. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/411795710.1155/2022/4117957 ↗
68. Xu, H., et al.: Supervised machine learning techniques to the prediction of tunnel boring machine penetration rate. Appl. Sc. 9(18), 3715 (2019)10.3390/app9183715 ↗
69. Xue, J., et al.: Review of ultra-high performance concrete and its application in bridge engineering. Constr. Build. Mater. 260, 119844 (2020)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119844 ↗
70. Yang, T., et al.: Experimental and numerical investigation of bond behavior between geopolymer based ultra-high-performance concrete and steel bars. Constr. Build. Mater. 345, 128220 (2022)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128220 ↗
71. Yavas, A., Goker, C.O.: Impact of reinforcement ratio on shear behavior of I-shaped UHPC beams with and without fiber shear reinforcement. Materials (basel) 13(7), 1525 (2020a)10.3390/ma13071525 ↗
72. Yavas, A., Goker, C.O.: Impact of reinforcement ratio on shear behavior of I-shaped UHPC beams with and without fiber shear reinforcement. Materials 13(7), 1525 (2020b)10.3390/ma13071525 ↗
73. Yoo, D.-Y., Banthia, N.: Mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete: a review. Cement Concr. Compos. 73, 267–280 (2016)10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.08.001 ↗
74. Yu, R., Spiesz, P., Brouwers, H.J.H.: Mix design and properties assessment of ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC). Cement Concr. Res. 56, 29–39 (2014)10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.11.002 ↗
75. Zhang, J., et al.: Machine-learning-assisted shear strength prediction of reinforced concrete beams with and without stirrups. Eng. Comput. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01076-x10.1007/s00366-020-01076-x ↗