Digital twin-based non-destructive testing for structural health monitoring of bridges
Source abstract
Abstract
Bridges are critical components of transportation infrastructure, connecting communities and facilitating the movement of goods and people. Real-time monitoring of structural states of bridges can provide reasonable guidance for bridge maintenance. To reduce maintenance costs and extend the lifespan of bridges, a digital twin-based non-destructive testing (NDT) method for the structural health monitoring of bridges is proposed. The digital twin-based NDT method is realised by the combination of three-dimensional modelling technology, sensor technology, finite element (FE) method, and surrogate models. The main advantage of the proposed method is that each node of the FE model can be regarded as a virtual sensor to reflect the structural performance of the bridge. In other words, the structural performance of the entire bridge can be monitored by the digital twin-based NDT method. In addition, the digital twin-based NDT method integrates the advantages of FE models that can provide a causal relationship in structural analysis and the characteristics of surrogate models that are easy to build and less costly. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by a suspension bridge.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Numerical Simulation Research Institute, Luoyang SiPesc Ltd, LuoYang, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/0885-9507.0017010.1111/0885-9507.00170 ↗
2. 10.1080/15732479.2019.160477210.1080/15732479.2019.1604772 ↗
3. 10.1007/s13349-020-00398-010.1007/s13349-020-00398-0 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.eng.2020.07.02610.1016/j.eng.2020.07.026 ↗
5. 10.3390/s2113433610.3390/s21134336 ↗
6. 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.000076310.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000763 ↗
7. 10.3390/su1306338610.3390/su13063386 ↗
8. 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.275606910.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069 ↗
9. 10.1007/s12652-018-0953-610.1007/s12652-018-0953-6 ↗
10. Bole M, Powell G, Rousseau E. Taking Control of the Digital Twin. Soc Nav Archit Mar Eng. 2017;1–19.
11. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.04510.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.045 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.404986110.1115/1.4049861 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.405360610.1115/1.4053606 ↗
14. 10.1038/s43588-021-00069-010.1038/s43588-021-00069-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.06.00610.1016/j.jmsy.2023.06.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.05510.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.055 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10010-021-00468-910.1007/s10010-021-00468-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10707610.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107076 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10952610.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109526 ↗
20. 10.1080/15732479.2019.162078910.1080/15732479.2019.1620789 ↗
21. Ye C, Butler L, Bartek C, et al. A Digital Twin of Bridges for Structural Health Monitoring for Proceedings of the 12. 12th Int Work Struct Heal Monit. Stanford University, CA, USA. 2019.
22. 10.1109/Morgeo49228.2020.912188210.1109/Morgeo49228.2020.9121882 ↗
23. 10.1007/s11042-021-10649-x10.1007/s11042-021-10649-x ↗
24. 10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.954010810.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540108 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10383810.1016/j.autcon.2021.103838 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10272610.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 ↗
27. 10.1109/TII.2021.311511910.1109/TII.2021.3115119 ↗
28. 10.3390/su1304205110.3390/su13042051 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.10354710.1016/j.autcon.2020.103547 ↗
30. 10.3390/rs1122265110.3390/rs11222651 ↗
31. 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.000173310.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0001733 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10811310.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108113 ↗
33. 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.000109310.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001093 ↗
34. 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.000082410.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000824 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11032010.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110320 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.405607710.1115/1.4056077 ↗
37. 10.1080/10589759.2011.61045210.1080/10589759.2011.610452 ↗
38. 10.1080/10589759.2012.67452610.1080/10589759.2012.674526 ↗
39. 10.1080/10589759.2014.100283910.1080/10589759.2014.1002839 ↗
40. 10.3151/jact.17.38110.3151/jact.17.381 ↗
41. 10.3390/app1120975710.3390/app11209757 ↗
42. 10.1080/10589759.2023.221428910.1080/10589759.2023.2214289 ↗
43. 10.1007/s00158-019-02248-010.1007/s00158-019-02248-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.02510.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.025 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.04510.1016/j.apm.2014.11.045 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.404411210.1115/1.4044112 ↗
47. 10.1115/1.405101410.1115/1.4051014 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.00210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.002 ↗
49. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.150910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.1509 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.10654110.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106541 ↗