Ultrasonic signal classification for composite materials via deep convolutional neural networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Ultrasonic testing (UT) is the most commonly used non-destructive testing method in the aerospace field. However, for the detection of delamination defect in multi-layer composite adhesive materials with metal and non-metal bonding, traditional energy statistics methods are limited and cannot achieve high-precision automatic signal classification. This article proposes a signal classification model based on hybrid neural networks. By studying the classification accuracy of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and long short-term memory networks (LSTM) for different types of signals, a relatively balanced classification is achieved, which effectively improves the classification accuracy. By integrating attention mechanisms, the ability of the detection model to identify key features is further enhanced. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves an accuracy of 98.57%. Bayesian Optimisation (BO) can effectively and automatically select the optimal hyperparameters, and achieve global optimisation. In the experiment, the accuracy increased by 0.73% compared to the benchmark value. Comparative experiments show that the signal classification model established in this paper has good performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Flow Measurement and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jiangsu University
Yangzhou University
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Independent innovation fund of Jiangsu Agricultural Committee
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11295110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2011.57742810.1080/10589759.2011.577428 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227400110.1080/10589759.2023.2274001 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11755410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117554 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2018.03.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12549910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125499 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10801610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108016 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213436510.1080/10589759.2022.2134365 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.01210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.012 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11343510.1016/j.measurement.2023.113435 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2022.10785710.1016/j.optlastec.2022.107857 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2014.91421010.1080/10589759.2014.914210 ↗
13. Armaghani DJ, Mamou A, Maraveas C, et al. Predicting the unconfined compressive strength of granite using only two non-destructive test indexes. Geomech Eng. 2021 May;25(4):317–330.
14. 10.1007/s00603-022-03046-910.1007/s00603-022-03046-9 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.10502310.1016/j.chemolab.2023.105023 ↗
16. 10.3390/su1512964310.3390/su15129643 ↗
17. 10.23919/IConAC.2019.889510210.23919/IConAC.2019.8895102 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.11084610.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110846 ↗
19. 10.1088/1361-6579/aaaa9d10.1088/1361-6579/aaaa9d ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.01310.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.013 ↗
21. Barile C, Casavola C, Pappalettera G, et al. editors. Designing a deep neural network for an acousto-ultrasonic investigation on the corrosion behaviour of CORTEN steel. In: 4th International Conference on Structural Integrity (ICSI) Funchal, Madeira, Portugal; 2021 Aug-Sep 30 02; Electr Network2022.
22. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.01.00510.1016/j.precisioneng.2024.01.005 ↗
23. 10.1515/rams-2023-017210.1515/rams-2023-0172 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.21252810.1016/j.geoen.2023.212528 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.10750810.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107508 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.accre.2024.04.00310.1016/j.accre.2024.04.003 ↗
27. 10.1109/TKDE.2021.312645610.1109/TKDE.2021.3126456 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.energy.2024.13032610.1016/j.energy.2024.130326 ↗
29. 10.1109/TLA.2022.990475710.1109/TLA.2022.9904757 ↗
30. Dai ZX, Yu HB, Low BKH, et al. Bayesian optimization meets bayesian optimal stopping. In: editors. 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML); 2019 Jun 09–15; Long Beach, CA.