Additive manufacturing and non-destructive testing of topology-optimised aluminium components
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) unlocks novel industrial possibilities in relation to design optimisation for lightweight structures, e.g. in aerospace applications. However, the inherent geometric complexity of topology-optimised AM components represents a major challenge for conventional non-destructive testing (NDT) methods. Due to its flexibility and high throughput, industrial X-ray micro-computed tomography (XCT) is the most promising NDT method for AM. In this contribution, we investigate topology-optimised engine brackets that were manufactured from AlSi10 Mg using selective laser melting (SLM). We investigate the respective parts and in-process test coupons in a multiscale approach to be able to extract pore size distributions at different spatial resolutions between 105 and 1.25 µm isometric voxel size. At the lowest spatial resolutions, existing pores cannot be segmented. In contrast, decreasing voxel sizes leads to an increase in total porosity up to 1.53%. Defects like pores in load-carrying areas can profoundly influence the component´s mechanical performance; hence, extensive NDT investigations are mandatory to predict the effect of defects in aluminium AM components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria
FOTEC Forschungs- Und Technologietransfer GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Aerospace & Advanced Composites GmbH, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Funding
SpaceNDT · Photonic Sensing for Smarter Processes · COMET
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Barroqueiro B · J Manuf Mater Process · 2019 · 3 · 52
2. 10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.01110.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.011 ↗
4. ECSS. Space product assurance: quality assurance. The Netherlands: ESA Requirements and Standards Division; 2013. pp. 1–67. (ECSS-Q-ST-20C Rev.1).
5. 3D printing in space. 2014.
6. Gebisa AW · IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng · 2017 · 276
7. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.00610.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.006 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.04510.1016/j.msea.2011.06.045 ↗
9. GrabCAD. GE jet engine bracket challenge [Internet]; 2013. [cited 2013 Aug 9]. Available from: https://grabcad.com/challenges/ge-jet-engine-bracket-challenge/
10. 10.1109/TVCG.2010.21410.1109/TVCG.2010.214 ↗
11. Reiter M, Erler M, Kuhn C, et al. SimCT : a simulation tool for X-ray imaging. 2016. pp. 2–8.
12. Reiter M · iCT Conf · 2014 · 273
13. Lifton JJ
14. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.05.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2012.05.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.09110.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.10110.1016/j.msea.2019.04.101 ↗