journal article·2024-11-16Open access

Reflection behaviour of SH0 from small defects in thin sheets, with application to EMAT inspection of titanium

Christian Peyton, Steve Dixon, Benjamin Dutton, Wilson Vesga, Rachel S. Edwards

Abstract

Defects can arise within the weld during the laser welding process of thin titanium sheets, and it is critical that these defects are detected.Shear horizontal (SH) waves offer good potential for defect detection, but require an understanding of how the ultrasonic waves interact with defects, in order to develop an optimised inspection setup, increasing the probability of defect detection.The geometry of a defect strongly affects the reflected signal magnitude, with finite element simulations showing that defect width and length determine the maximum SH0 wave reflection.Experiments confirm this behaviour.The defect width is shown to affect the reflection behaviour due to wave interference.Phase differences between the front face reflection and back face reflection cause a shift in the peak position.In addition, the experimental work presented in this paper also shows the potential for electromagnetic acoustic transducers to be used for the inspection of titanium components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK

Metrology & NDT, Manufacturing Technology Centre, Coventry, UK

Funding

UK Research Centre in NDE, Imperial College London

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bray D, McBride D. Nondestrucitve testing techniques. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc.; 1992.
2. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.03.01310.1016/j.optlaseng.2017.03.013 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10853-006-0833-x10.1007/s10853-006-0833-x ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-018-2030-x10.1007/s00170-018-2030-x ↗
5. 10.1007/s00170-017-0461-410.1007/s00170-017-0461-4 ↗
6. 10.1179/1362171813Y.000000018010.1179/1362171813Y.0000000180 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.05.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2015.05.005 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3743-110.1007/978-1-4757-3743-1 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.12310.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.123 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.001 ↗
11. Kazys R, Voleisis A, Voleisien´e B. High temperature ultrasonic transducers: review. Ul- Tragarsas (Ultrasound). 2008;63:7–17.
12. 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.287672310.1109/TUFFC.2018.2876723 ↗
13. Ling EH, Rahim RHA. A review on ultrasonic guided wave technology. Aust J Mech Eng. 2017;11(1):32–44. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14484846.2017.1373385
14. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10839010.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108390 ↗
15. 10.1121/1.155469410.1121/1.1554694 ↗
16. Grant I, Phillips W. Electromagnetism. 2nd ed. New Jersey: John Willey & Sons, Inc.; 1991.
17. Salzburger HJ, Mohrbacher H. In-line quality control of laser welds of tailored blanks by couplant free ultrasonic inspection - emus-lasus. Weld Res Abroad. 2003;49:1–8.
18. 10.1080/1058975070132787410.1080/10589750701327874 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10921-014-0250-z10.1007/s10921-014-0250-z ↗
20. Woods S, Jian X, Patel HV, et al. A new and novel inspection system for titanium billets. Non-Destructive Testing Conference 2010; 14/09/2010 - 16/09/2010; Cardiff UK. British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing; 2010. p. 94–103. https://www.proceedings.com/11550.html
21. 10.1017/CBO978110727361010.1017/CBO9781107273610 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10921-011-0111-y10.1007/s10921-011-0111-y ↗
23. 10.1016/0041-624X(91)90025-410.1016/0041-624X(91)90025-4 ↗
24. Rose J, Zhu W, Zaidi M. Ultrasonic ndt of titanium diffusion bonding with guided waves. Mater Eval. 1998;56:535–539.
25. 10.1121/1.340944610.1121/1.3409446 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.08.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2016.08.004 ↗
27. 10.1121/1.276447210.1121/1.2764472 ↗
28. 10.1080/10589759.2019.168448910.1080/10589759.2019.1684489 ↗
29. 10.1121/1.298742610.1121/1.2987426 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2018.10.007 ↗
31. 10.1115/QNDE2021-7494210.1115/QNDE2021-74942 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.00110.1016/j.ndteint.2018.11.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10913810.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109138 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.10217510.1016/j.ndteint.2019.102175 ↗