journal article·2014-10-02

Stress concentration impact on the magnetic memory signal of ferromagnetic structural steel

Haihong Huang, Shilin Jiang, Cheng Yang, Zhifeng Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

A novel method for quantitatively evaluating the impact of stress concentration on the magnetic memory signal of ferromagnetic structural steels was proposed. A theoretical model was established to illustrate the impact of stress concentration and microdefects on the normal component of surface magnetic signals, Hp(y), and its gradient K. The Hp(y) signals of the notched sheet specimens with different stress concentration factors were measured throughout the tension–tension fatigue tests, and the variation in measured Hp(y) and K was studied. It shows that the Hp(y) varied intensively and changed its polarity when crack initiated in the stress concentration area. The maximum gradient, Kmax, was used to indicate the stress concentration degree, which was found to be theoretically exponential increasing with an increase in the crack length. The research provides the potential possibility of quantitative inspection on stress concentration and microdefects for ferromagnetic structural steels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0246906510.1007/BF02469065 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.04810.1016/j.jmmm.2011.08.048 ↗
4. Zhang WM · Int J Appl Electrom · 2010 · 33 · 1201
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.00610.1016/j.ndteint.2009.12.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.09.06610.1016/j.jmmm.2009.09.066 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.05.01510.1016/j.jmmm.2011.05.015 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.01.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2013.01.005 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2007.10.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2008.12.005 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.04.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2008.04.002 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.04.04710.1016/j.jmmm.2014.04.047 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.009 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01651.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01651.x ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2009.01.008 ↗
16. 10.1784/insi.2011.53.3.14210.1784/insi.2011.53.3.142 ↗
17. 10.1007/s10921-014-0235-y10.1007/s10921-014-0235-y ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2009.08.002 ↗
20. Dong SY · Int J Appl Electrom · 2010 · 33 · 1219
21. 10.1080/1058975090279536610.1080/10589750902795366 ↗
22. 10.1088/0022-3727/28/8/00110.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.154005910.1063/1.1540059 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2003.81588210.1109/TMAG.2003.815882 ↗
25. Förster F · Sov J Nondestruct Test · 1982 · 8 · 841
26. BrayDE, StanleyRK. Nondestructive evaluation: a tool in design, manufacturing and service. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996.
27. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2011.09.007 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2012.12.004 ↗