Estimation of Lamb wave propagation by means of Fourier spectral frequency response function
Source abstract
Abstract
Considering the frequency dispersion and the scale sensitivity in wave propagation, the central frequency and bandwidth should be carefully selected in Lamb wave-based structural health monitoring. These crucial parameters are hardly determined without the prior knowledge. Therefore, massive trials should be conducted before the formal test. A Fourier spectral Frequency Response Function (FRF) method is proposed to address this problem. As the FRF contains wide-band information on the relationship between excitation and output, the Lamb wave responses in a wide frequency range can be estimated by using an arbitrary virtual input within the frame of single FRF test, being free from the massive experimental works. The theoretical FRF can be obtained from the unit impulse response of a linear system, but this path is impracticable due to the difficulty of exciting the ideal impulse. Considering the integral relationship and Fourier differential properties between step excitation and the ideal impulse, a robust approximation of wave signal by FRF is developed. Synthetic data tests and experiments both verified that the present method can accurately extract the response in isotropic and anisotropic materials for the specifically designed excitation signal in a wide parameter range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Underwater Acoustics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Jiaotong University
The State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an, P.R. China
Funding
the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province and Excellent Talent · the National Key Research and Development Project · the National Natural Science Foundation of China · the Foundation of Beilin District
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/147592171562749010.1177/1475921715627490 ↗
2. 10.1088/0957-0233/22/2/02570110.1088/0957-0233/22/2/025701 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.00810.1016/j.ymssp.2018.02.008 ↗
4. 10.1109/58.14317210.1109/58.143172 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.002 ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2021.188954810.1080/10589759.2021.1889548 ↗
7. Huifeng Z, Liuchen H, Piaopiao F, et al. The study of micro-crack localisation based on vibro-acoustic modulation and time reversal method. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2019;34(3):324–338.
8. 10.1016/j.ultras.2012.06.01010.1016/j.ultras.2012.06.010 ↗
9. 10.1109/TUFFC.2015.249629210.1109/TUFFC.2015.2496292 ↗
10. Xiao H, Shen Y, Xiao L, et al. Damage detection in composite structures with high-damping materials using time reversal method. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2018;33(3):329–345.
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.321-323.110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.321-323.1 ↗
12. 10.1109/IST.2013.672971910.1109/IST.2013.6729719 ↗
13. Santoni GB Yu L Xu B et al. Lamb wave-mode tuning of piezoelectric wafer active sensors for structural health monitoring. 2007.10.1115/1.2748469 ↗
14. 10.12783/shm2017/1405310.12783/shm2017/14053 ↗
15. Michaels JE, Lee SJ, Hall JS, editors. Multi-mode and multi-frequency guided wave imaging via chirp excitations. Health monitoring of structural and biological systems. Vol. 2011. New York: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2011. 7984 p.
16. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.09.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2013.09.008 ↗
17. Fu S, Shi L, Zhou Y, et al. Enhancement of Lamb Wave imaging resolution by step pulse excitation and prewarping. Shock Vib. 2015;2015:2015.
18. 10.1088/0256-307X/30/3/03430110.1088/0256-307X/30/3/034301 ↗
19. 10.1121/1.497406310.1121/1.4974063 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.01110.1016/j.ultras.2018.02.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.02.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2019.02.004 ↗
22. 10.1088/1361-665X/26/2/02501610.1088/1361-665X/26/2/025016 ↗
23. 10.3390/s2012350210.3390/s20123502 ↗
24. 10.1177/147592171666525210.1177/1475921716665252 ↗
25. 10.1121/1.298241410.1121/1.2982414 ↗
26. 10.1002/stc.177610.1002/stc.1776 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.04310.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.043 ↗
28. 10.1109/TUFFC.2003.119796510.1109/TUFFC.2003.1197965 ↗
29. 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.130510.1109/TUFFC.2009.1305 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.10.01810.1016/j.ymssp.2012.10.018 ↗
31. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/5/05501810.1088/0964-1726/20/5/055018 ↗
32. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/10502410.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105024 ↗
33. Chen SS Donoho DL Saunders MA. Atomic decomposition by basis pursuit. SIAM Review. 1998;20(1):61.10.1137/S1064827596304010 ↗
34. 10.1137/08071448810.1137/080714488 ↗
35. Van Den Berg E Friedlander MP. SPGL1: a solver for large-scale sparse reconstruction. June 2007.
36. 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.12.01410.1016/j.ultras.2015.12.014 ↗