Numerical and experimental evaluation of the receiving performance of meander-line coil EMATs
Source abstract
Abstract
Electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs) have low transduction efficiency and they are sensitive to the electromagnetic noise, which can result in low signal-to-noise ratio of the received signals. This article presents a multi-physical finite element (FE) model for meander-line (ML) coil EMATs, operating on the Lorentz force mechanism, and the influence of the surrounding electromagnetic fields is also taken into consideration. The generation and reception of Rayleigh waves by EMATs can be described by this model. The receiving performances of two kinds of ML coils have been simulated by the FE model and tested by experiments. The experimental results agree well with the simulation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wireless Power Transfer Systems · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. FrostHM. Electromagnetic ultrasound transducers: principles, practice and applications. In: ThurstonRN, PierceAD, editors. Physical acoustics. Vol. XIV. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1979. p. 176–276.10.1016/B978-0-12-477914-3.50008-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/B978-0-12-477919-8.50010-810.1016/B978-0-12-477919-8.50010-8 ↗
3. AlersGA. Noncontact ultrasonic testing with electromagnetic acoustic transducers. In: ZuechN, editor. Handbook of intelligent sensors for industrial automation. New York, NY: Addison Wesley; 1992. p. 285–306.
4. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3743-110.1007/978-1-4757-3743-1 ↗
5. Maxfield BW · Mater Eval · 1983 · 41 · 1399
6. Alers GA · Mater Eval · 1987 · 45 · 1184
7. 10.1016/S0963-8695(98)00062-010.1016/S0963-8695(98)00062-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.00910.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.009 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00083-X10.1016/S0041-624X(01)00083-X ↗
10. 10.1016/B978-0-12-477910-5.50008-810.1016/B978-0-12-477910-5.50008-8 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.243580310.1063/1.2435803 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.34766210.1063/1.347662 ↗
13. 10.1109/T-SU.1984.3148010.1109/T-SU.1984.31480 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.36570110.1063/1.365701 ↗
15. 10.1121/1.218428810.1121/1.2184288 ↗
16. Shapoorabadi RJ · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 10E10210.1063/1.1851393 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.04.00110.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.04.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.04810.1016/j.sna.2006.01.048 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2008.07.00410.1016/j.sna.2008.07.004 ↗
20. Shapoorabadi RJ · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 10Q10610.1063/1.1855201 ↗
21. 10.1109/20.76729710.1109/20.767297 ↗
22. 10.1109/20.21132310.1109/20.211323 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.00810.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.008 ↗
24. 10.1080/10589759.2010.51122010.1080/10589759.2010.511220 ↗
25. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.175410.1109/TUFFC.2010.1754 ↗