journal article·2026-09Open access

Application of surrogate models to FE simulation for a sizing press in a hot rolling mill

Hiroto Goto, Peter Eberhard

Abstract

Abstract In steel production plants, finite element (FE) simulations are widely used to develop plastic deformation processes such as rolling and forging. However, these simulations are large-scale and highly nonlinear, and therefore require long computation times, which makes systematic optimization of process conditions difficult. In this study, a POD-based non-intrusive reduced order model (NIROM), which is used here as a surrogate model, is applied to FE simulations of a sizing press in a hot rolling mill to address this challenge. The method combines Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) with machine-learning-based regression to learn from existing simulation results and predict unknown process conditions. Gaussian process regression (GPR) is employed as the regression model. This approach accelerates computations while preserving the relevant physical characteristics of the solution. For slab displacement, POD-based NIROM with Gaussian process regression as developed in this study achieves a relative root mean square error (RMSE) of approximately 5 % across all nodes at each time step, although periodic error growth is observed during initial slab–die contact. Excluding the initial contact phase, relative RMSE values in all directions remain under 1 % relative to the characteristic lengths of the slab in the conveyance, thickness, and width directions. While one FE simulation requires about 20 hours on the target computational environment, the surrogate model produces predictions within a few seconds, resulting in a significant reduction in computation time. The results demonstrate that POD-based NIROM with Gaussian process regression is effective for predicting displacement even in simulations involving complex plastic deformation such as sizing press operations. Furthermore, the method provides sufficient accuracy and speed for process development in steel production, indicating its practical applicability. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first reported application of a POD-based NIROM to FE simulation models involving large-scale plastic deformation in industrial steel production processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Phalippou P, Bouabdallah S, Breitkopf P, Villon P, Zarroug M (2020) Sparse POD modal subsets for reduced-order nonlinear explicit dynamics. Int J Numer Meth Eng 121(4):763–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.624310.1002/nme.6243 ↗
2. Fehr J, Holzwarth P, Eberhard P (2016) Interface and model reduction for efficient explicit simulations: A case study with nonlinear vehicle crash models. Math Comput Model Dyn Syst 22(4):380–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2016.119838510.1080/13873954.2016.1198385 ↗
3. Shiiba T, Fehr J, Eberhard P (2012) Flexible multibody simulation of automotive systems with non-modal model reduction techniques. Veh Syst Dyn 50(12):1905–1922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012.70040310.1080/00423114.2012.700403 ↗
4. Swischuk R, Mainini L, Peherstorfer B, Willcox K (2019) Projection-based model reduction: Formulations for physics-based machine learning. Computers & Fluids 179:704–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.02110.1016/j.compfluid.2018.07.021 ↗
5. Kapteyn MG, Knezevic DJ, Huynh DBP, Tran M, Willcox KE (2022) Data-driven physics-based digital twins via a library of component-based reduced-order models. Int J Numer Meth Eng 123(13):2986–3003. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.642310.1002/nme.6423 ↗
6. Hesthaven JS, Ubbiali S (2018) Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of nonlinear problems using neural networks. J Comput Phys 363:55–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.03710.1016/j.jcp.2018.02.037 ↗
7. Wang Q, Ray D, Hesthaven JS (2019) Non-intrusive reduced order modeling of unsteady flows using artificial neural networks with application to a combustion problem. J Comput Phys 384:289–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.03110.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.031 ↗
8. Jacquier P, Abdedou A, Delmas V, Soulaïmani A (2021) Non-intrusive reduced-order modeling using uncertainty-aware deep neural networks and proper orthogonal decomposition: Application to flood modeling. J Comput Phys 424:109854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.10985410.1016/j.jcp.2020.109854 ↗
9. Xiao D, Fang F, Pain CC, Navon IM (2015) Non-intrusive reduced-order modelling of the Navier-Stokes equations based on radial basis function interpolation. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 79(11):580–595. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.406610.1002/fld.4066 ↗
10. Yu J, Yan C, Guo M (2019) Non-intrusive reduced-order modeling for fluid problems: A brief review. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering 233(16):5896–5912. https://doi.org/10.1177/095441001989072110.1177/0954410019890721 ↗
11. Lo Verso M, Riva S, Introini C, Cervi E, Giacobbo F, Savoldi L, Di Prinzio M, Caramello M, Barucca L, Cammi A (2054) Application of a non-intrusive reduced order modeling approach to magnetohydrodynamics. Phys Fluids 36:107167. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.023070810.1063/5.0230708 ↗
12. Guo M, Hesthaven JS (2018) Reduced order modeling for nonlinear structural analysis using Gaussian process regression. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 341:807–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.07.01710.1016/j.cma.2018.07.017 ↗
13. Kneifl J, Grunert D, Fehr J (2021) A nonintrusive nonlinear model reduction method for structural dynamical problems based on machine learning. Int J Numer Meth Eng 122(17):4774–4786. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.671210.1002/nme.6712 ↗
14. Hamdaoui M, Le Quilliec G, Breitkopf P, Villon P (2013) Surrogate POD models for parametrized sheet metal forming applications. Key Eng Mater 554–557:919–927. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.91910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.919 ↗
15. Dang VT, Lafon P, Labergère C, Daniel L (2017) Surrogate models for sheet metal stamping problem based on the combination of proper orthogonal decomposition and radial basis function. AIP Conference Proceedings 1896(1):100008. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500812610.1063/1.5008126 ↗
16. de Gooijer BM, Havinga J, Geijselaers HJM, van den Boogaard AH (2021) Evaluation of POD-based surrogate models of fields resulting from nonlinear FEM simulations. Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences 8(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40323-021-00210-810.1186/s40323-021-00210-8 ↗
17. Hira T, Isobe K, Abe H, Nikaido H, Fujitsu T, Zuyama S (1990) Deformation of slab under heavy reduction of width by sizing press. Kawasaki Steel Technical Report 22:32–40. Available at: https://www.jfe-steel.co.jp/archives/en/ksc_giho/no.22/e22-032-040.pdf
18. Nikaido H, Fuziwara K, Abe H, Nihei M (1984) Development of slab sizing press for heavy width reduction in hot strip mills. Iron Steel Eng 21:48–53
19. Isobe K, Hira T, Abe H (1989) Minimization of crop loss and width control of hot-rolling slabs by width sizing press. J Japan Soc Technol Plast 30:682–688 (in Japanese)
20. Müller HA, Rohde W (1992) Behavior of slabs under deformation in a sizing press with large width reductions. Metall Plant Technol Inter 15:60–69
21. Chun MS, Ahn I-T, Moon Y-H (2005) Deformation behavior of a slab with width reduction in a hot mill. J Mater Eng Perform 14(3):408–412. https://doi.org/10.1361/1059949052396810.1361/10599490523968 ↗
22. Goto H, Miyake M, Kimura Y (2023) Influence of thickness profile after sizing press on width profile at head and tail portions of slabs. ISIJ Int 63(11):2023–2033. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-19710.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2023-197 ↗
23. Forouzan MR, Salehi I, Adibi-Sedeh AH (2009) A comparative study of slab deformation under heavy width reduction by sizing press and vertical rolling using FE analysis. J Mater Process Technol 209:728–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.06310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.063 ↗
24. Wu W, Peng W, Shi W, Chen X, Liu J, Li X, Zhang D, Sun J (2025) Analysis of metal flow behavior during the sizing press process. Int J Mech Sci 307:110914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.11091410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110914 ↗
25. Tazoe N (2008) Progress in sizing press for hot strip mill line. IHI Engineering Review 41:73–79
26. Misaka Y, Yoshimoto T (1967) Rakka hanma-ho ni yoru futsū tansoko no nekkan heikin henkei teiko (Formulation of Mean Resistance to Deformation of Plain Carbon Steel at Elevated Temperatures by the Drop Hammer Method). J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 8:414–422 (in Japanese)
27. The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers (1980) Kinzoku Zairyo no Dansei Keisu (Elastic Modulus of Metallic Material). The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Tokyo (in Japanese)
28. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, VanderPlas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825–2830