A review of neural networks used in plastic deformation of materials and an electromagnetic forming application
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This article presents a review of the current state of neural network applications in plastic deformation processes, together with an experimental study and modeling of the electromagnetic forming process of AlMn0.5Mg0.5 aluminum alloy sheet. The first part summarizes several case studies that demonstrate the potential of neural networks in the plastic deformation of metallic and non-metallic materials such as composites, glasses, polymers, foams, clay, as well as shape memory alloys. This part examines different types of neural networks, learning algorithms, feature selection methods, and optimization techniques that apply to plastic deformation processes. It also explores their integration with other modeling approaches, such as regression and finite element analysis. The second part focuses on predicting the maximum deformation depth, which serves as an indicator of formability, in the electromagnetic bulging of round cups. Six process parameters (deformed part size, thickness of specimen, gap distance, number of coil turns, capacitance of capacitor bank and the charging voltage) are identified as significantly influential and serve as input variables for both the experimental design and modeling. The study applies both nonlinear regression and neural networks to predict the output parameter. Both models reliably predict the output parameter, and their performance is demonstrated by an average relative error of 2.53% for the nonlinear regression model and a coefficient of determination of 0.9971 for the neural network model, which indicate their potential for manufacturing process control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang SL, Wang JM, Shi LY et al (2018) Engineering management for high-end equipment intelligent manufacturing. Front Eng Manag 5:420–450. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-201805010.15302/J-FEM-2018050 ↗
2. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
3. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a010.1038/323533a0 ↗
4. Osman IH, Laporte G (1996) Metaheuristics: A bibliography. Ann Oper Res 63:513–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0212542110.1007/BF02125421 ↗
5. Garrett JH Jr, Case MP, Hall JW et al (1993) Engineering applications of neural networks. J Intell Manuf 4:1–2110.1007/BF00124977 ↗
6. Theocaris PS, Panagiotopoulos PD (1995) Plasticity including the Bauschinger effect, studied by a neural network approach. Acta Mech 113:63–7510.1007/BF01212634 ↗
7. Kim DH, Kim DJ, Ko DC et al (1998) The application of the artificial neural network and Taguchi method to process sequence design in metal forming processes. Met Mater 4:548–55310.1007/BF03187826 ↗
8. Kim DH, Kim DJ, Kim BM (1999) The application of neural networks and statistical methods to process design in metal forming processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:886–89410.1007/s001700050146 ↗
9. Cassola S, Duhovic M, Schmidt T et al (2022) Machine learning for polymer composites process simulation - A review. Compos B: Eng 246:110208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11020810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110208 ↗
10. Ferrándiz B, Palacios M, Mailhé C et al (2025) Thermal field estimation in CFRTP composites using an attention-enhanced U-Net. Int J Mater Form 18:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-025-01939-y10.1007/s12289-025-01939-y ↗
11. Rosiak A, Diehl PD, Marcelino R et al (2026) Machine learning prediction of the forming limit curve of dual phase steels. Int J Mater Form 19:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-026-01991-210.1007/s12289-026-01991-2 ↗
12. Thiery S, El Abdine MZ, Heger J et al (2025) Failure prediction by using a recurrent neural network in incremental sheet forming with active medium. Int J Mater Form 18:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-025-01957-w10.1007/s12289-025-01957-w ↗
13. Xia JS, Khaje Khabaz M, Patra I et al (2023) Using feed-forward perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) model to determine the rolling force, power and slip of the tandem cold rolling. ISA Trans 132:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.06.00910.1016/j.isatra.2022.06.009 ↗
14. Shen S, Guye D, Ma X et al (2022) Multistep networks for roll force prediction in hot strip rolling mill. Mach Learn Appl 7:100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.10024510.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100245 ↗
15. Zhang SH, Deng L, Che LZ (2022) An integrated model of rolling force for extra-thick plate by combining theoretical model and neural network model. J Manuf Process 75:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.06310.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.063 ↗
16. Yan Z, Bu H, Hu C et al (2023) Rolling force prediction during FGC process of tandem cold rolling based on IQGA-WNN ensemble learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125:2869–2884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-10899-z10.1007/s00170-023-10899-z ↗
17. Huang Y, Zhou X, Gao Z (2022) Thickness prediction of thin strip cold rolling based on VBGM-RBF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:5865–5884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09122-210.1007/s00170-022-09122-2 ↗
18. Dong Z, Li X, Luan F et al (2022) Prediction and analysis of key parameters of head deformation of hot-rolled plates based on artificial neural networks. J Manuf Process 77:282–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.02210.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.022 ↗
19. Soleymani M, Khoshnevisan M, Davoodi B (2022) Prediction of micro-hardness in thread rolling of St37 by convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 123:3261–3274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10355-410.1007/s00170-022-10355-4 ↗
20. Wang Y, Li C, Peng L et al (2021) Application of convolutional neural networks for prediction of strip flatness in tandem cold rolling process. J Manuf Process 68:512–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.06210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.05.062 ↗
21. Esendağ K, Orta AH, Kayabaş İ et al (2019) Prediction of reversible cold rolling process parameters with artificial neural network and regression models for industrial applications: A case study. Procedia CIRP 79:644–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.06110.1016/j.procir.2019.02.061 ↗
22. Olejarczyk-Wożeńska I, Mrzygłód B, Hojny M (2023) Modelling the high-temperature deformation characteristics of S355 steel using artificial neural networks. Arch Civ Mech Eng 23:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-022-00538-x10.1007/s43452-022-00538-x ↗
23. D’Addona DM, Antonelli D (2018) Neural network multiobjective optimization of hot forging. Procedia CIRP 67:498–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.25110.1016/j.procir.2017.12.251 ↗
24. Lin YC, Chen DD, Chen MS (2018) A precise BP neural network-based online model predictive control strategy for die forging hydraulic press machine. Neural Comput Appl 29:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2556-510.1007/s00521-016-2556-5 ↗
25. Dinesh Kumar S, Purushothaman K, Chandramohan D et al (2020) ANN-AGCS for the prediction of temperature distribution and required energy in hot forging process using finite element analysis. Mater Today: Proc 21:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.42610.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.426 ↗
26. Opěla P, Schindler I, Kawulok P et al (2022) Shallow and deep learning of an artificial neural network model describing a hot flow stress Evolution: A comparative study. Mater Des 220:110880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11088010.1016/j.matdes.2022.110880 ↗
27. Kodippili T, Lambert S, Arami A (2022) Data-driven prediction of forging outcome: Effect of preform shape on plastic strain in a magnesium alloy forging. Mater Today Commun 31:103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10321010.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103210 ↗
28. Kaur J, Pabla BS, Dhami SS (2019) Optimization and comparison of deformation during closed die forging of different parts. In: Malik H, Srivastava S, Sood YR, Ahmad A (eds) Applications of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1819-1_4410.1007/978-981-13-1819-1_44 ↗
29. Mrzygłód B, Hawryluk M, Gronostajski Z et al (2018) Durability analysis of forging tools after different variants of surface treatment using a decision-support system based on artificial neural networks. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2018.02.01010.1016/j.acme.2018.02.010 ↗
30. Mrzygłód B, Hawryluk M, Janik M et al (2020) Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural networks in a system for durability prediction of forging tools to forgings made of C45 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:1385–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05641-y10.1007/s00170-020-05641-y ↗
31. Jin Y, Zhao J, Zhang C et al (2021) Research on Neural network prediction of multidirectional forging microstructure evolution of GH4169 superalloy. J Mater Eng Perform 30:2708–2719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05536-310.1007/s11665-021-05536-3 ↗
32. Luo J, Zhao J, Yang Z et al (2022) Microstructure prediction of multi-directional forging for 30Cr2Ni4MoV steel by the secondary development of Deform software and BP neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:2971–2984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08615-w10.1007/s00170-021-08615-w ↗
33. Luo JH, Liu XF, Shi ZZ et al (2019) Microstructure quantification of Cu-4.7Sn alloys prepared by two-phase zone continuous casting and a BP artificial neural network model for microstructure prediction. Rare Met 38:1124–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-018-1023-010.1007/s12598-018-1023-0 ↗
34. Cheng C, Tang Z, Zhao L et al (2023) Thermal deformation behavior of ZA270.15Ce alloy: Constitutive equation, deep neural network model-based prediction, thermal processing map, and recrystallization behavior. J Mater Eng Perform 32:11432–11447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-023-07937-y10.1007/s11665-023-07937-y ↗
35. Xu W, Wang Z, Zhu X et al (2024) Intelligent optimization of cold radial forging process for 20CrMnTiH alloy based on GA-BP and performance analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 135:4281–4307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14713-210.1007/s00170-024-14713-2 ↗
36. Ayer Ö (2019) A forming load analysis for extrusion process of AZ31 magnesium. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 29:741–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(19)64984-810.1016/S1003-6326(19)64984-8 ↗
37. Jawwad AKA, Barghash MA (2013) Evaluating the effects of process parameters on maximum extrusion pressure using a new artificial neural network-based (ANN-based) partial-modeling technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:2547–2564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4852-x10.1007/s00170-013-4852-x ↗
38. Bakhtiari H, Karimi M, Rezazadeh S (2016) Modeling, analysis and multi-objective optimization of twist extrusion process using predictive models and meta-heuristic approaches, based on finite element results. J Intell Manuf 27:463–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0879-610.1007/s10845-014-0879-6 ↗
39. Bingöl S, Ayer Ö, Altinbalik T (2015) Extrusion load prediction of gear-like profile for different die geometries using ANN and FEM with experimental verification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:983–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6328-z10.1007/s00170-014-6328-z ↗
40. Fereshteh-Saniee F, Sepahi-Boroujeni A, Sepahi-Boroujeni S (2016) Optimized tool design for expansion equal channel angular extrusion (Exp-ECAE) process using FE-based neural network and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86:3471–3482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8487-610.1007/s00170-016-8487-6 ↗
41. Bai S, Fang G, Zhou J (2020) Construction of three-dimensional extrusion limit diagram for magnesium alloy using artificial neural network and its validation. J Mater Process Technol 275:116361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.11636110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.116361 ↗
42. Negozio M, Ferraro V, Donati L et al (2024) Predicting grain size in extruded AA6063 profiles: A unified approach based on finite element analysis and machine learning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 133:4543–4560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14021-910.1007/s00170-024-14021-9 ↗
43. Wang JH, Lo YL, Wang HY et al (2020) Multi-objective optimization framework for five-pass wire-drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:3049–3063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05226-910.1007/s00170-020-05226-9 ↗
44. Mohammed RJ, Ali JK, Nassar AA (2019) Experimental study and artificial neural networks prediction of effective parameters in continuous dieless wire drawing process. Basrah J Eng Sci 19:52–6310.33971/bjes.19.1.6 ↗
45. Bonatti C, Mohr D (2021) Neural network model predicting forming limits for bi-linear strain paths. Int J Plast 137:102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10288610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102886 ↗
46. Czinege I, Harangozó D (2024) Application of artificial neural networks for characterisation of formability properties of sheet metals. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 7:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.08.00310.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.08.003 ↗
47. Sharan SK, Paul SK, Kumari J et al (2025) Artificial neural network-based prediction of complete forming limit curves for steel in sheet metal forming. J Alloy Metall Syst 9:100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalmes.2025.10016610.1016/j.jalmes.2025.100166 ↗
48. Yamanaka A, Kamijyo R, Koenuma K et al (2020) Deep neural network approach to estimate biaxial stress-strain curves of sheet metals. Mater Des 195:108970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10897010.1016/j.matdes.2020.108970 ↗
49. Luca D (2015) Neural networks for parameters prediction of an electromagnetic forming process of FeP04 steel sheets. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80:689–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7006-510.1007/s00170-015-7006-5 ↗
50. Stiemer M, Nezhi Z, Rathjen K et al (2021) Numerical identification of design parameters for electromagnetic forming. In: Corallo L, Verleysen P (eds) 9th International Conference on High Speed Forming, San Sebastián, Spain. https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-2251810.17877/DE290R-22518 ↗
51. Satonkar N, Venkatachalam G, Pitchumani SV (2024) Finite element analysis of electromagnetic forming process and optimization of process parameters using RSM. Mathematics 12:1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/math1211162210.3390/math12111622 ↗
52. Xie Y, Tang W, Zhang F et al (2019) Optimization of variable blank holder force based on a sharing niching RBF neural network and an improved NSGA-II algorithm. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 20:285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00019-x10.1007/s12541-019-00019-x ↗
53. Meyes R, Donauer J, Schmeing A et al (2019) A recurrent neural network architecture for failure prediction in deep drawing sensory time series data. Procedia Manuf 34:789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.20510.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.205 ↗
54. Jamli MR, Farid NM (2019) The sustainability of neural network applications within finite element analysis in sheet metal forming: A review. Measurement 138:446–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.03410.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.034 ↗
55. Najm SM, Trzepieciński T, Kowalik M (2023) Modelling and parameter identification of coefficient of friction for deep-drawing quality steel sheets using the CatBoost machine learning algorithm and neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124:2229–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10544-110.1007/s00170-022-10544-1 ↗
56. Guo Y, Wang C, Han S et al (2025) A deep neural network model for parameter identification in deep drawing metal forming process. J Manuf Process 133:380–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.06710.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.067 ↗
57. Jiang Z, Ehmann KF, Cao J (2022) Prediction of forming temperature in electrically-assisted double-sided incremental forming using a neural network. J Mater Process Technol 302:117486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.11748610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2021.117486 ↗
58. Najm SM, Paniti I (2021) Artificial neural network for modeling and investigating the effects of forming tool characteristics on the accuracy and formability of thin aluminum alloy blanks when using SPIF. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 114:2591–2615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06712-410.1007/s00170-021-06712-4 ↗
59. Opritescu D, Volk W (2015) Automated driving for individualized sheet metal part production - A neural network approach. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 35:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.03.00610.1016/j.rcim.2015.03.006 ↗
60. Hartmann C, Opritescu D, Volk W (2019) An artificial neural network approach for tool path generation in incremental sheet metal free-forming. J Intell Manuf 30:757–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1279-x10.1007/s10845-016-1279-x ↗
61. Gondo S, Arai H (2022) Data-driven metal spinning using neural network for obtaining desired dimensions of formed cup. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 71:229–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.04410.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.044 ↗
62. Liu S, Xia Y, Liu Y et al (2022) Tool path planning of consecutive free-form sheet metal stamping with deep learning. J Mater Process Technol 303:117530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11753010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117530 ↗
63. Banerjee P, Hui NB, Dikshit MK et al (2020) Modelling and optimization of mean thickness of backward flow formed tubes using regression analysis, particle swarm optimization and neural network. SN Appl Sci 2:1353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-3127-z10.1007/s42452-020-3127-z ↗
64. Mohammadi F, Kashanizade H, Mashadi MM (2007) Optimization using finite element analysis, neural network, and experiment in tube hydroforming of aluminium T joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B-J Eng Manuf 221:1299–1305. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544054JEM74110.1243/09544054JEM741 ↗
65. Abbassi F, Ahmad F, Gulzar S et al (2020) Design of T-shaped tube hydroforming using finite element and artificial neural network modeling. J Mech Sci Technol 34:1129–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0214-410.1007/s12206-020-0214-4 ↗
66. Bonatti C, Berisha B, Mohr D (2022) From CP-FFT to CP-RNN: Recurrent neural network surrogate model of crystal plasticity. Int J Plast 158:103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10343010.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103430 ↗
67. Ibragimova O, Brahme A, Muhammad W et al (2022) A convolutional neural network based crystal plasticity finite element framework to predict localised deformation in metals. Int J Plast 157:103374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10337410.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103374 ↗
68. Stoffel M, Bamer F, Markert B (2020) Deep convolutional neural networks in structural dynamics under consideration of viscoplastic material behavior. Mech Res Commun 108:103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.10356510.1016/j.mechrescom.2020.103565 ↗
69. Yao D, Duan Y, Li M et al (2021) Hybrid identification method of coupled viscoplastic-damage constitutive parameters based on BP neural network and genetic algorithm. Eng Fract Mech 257:108027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.10802710.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.108027 ↗
70. Ebrahim AS, Zhang Q, Ha J (2024) Artificial neural network enhanced plasticity modeling and ductile fracture characterization of grade-1 commercial pure titanium. Int J Plast 179:104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2024.10404410.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104044 ↗
71. Niu S, Zhang E, Bazilevs Y et al (2023) Modeling finite-strain plasticity using physics-informed neural network and assessment of the network performance. J Mech Phys Solids 172:105177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10517710.1016/j.jmps.2022.105177 ↗
72. Yan Z, Sun G, Liu X et al (2022) FilterNet: A deep convolutional neural network for measuring plastic deformation from raw Barkhausen noise waveform. J Magn Magn Mater 555:169330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16933010.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169330 ↗
73. Heidenreich JN, Gorji MB, Mohr D (2023) Modeling structure-property relationships with convolutional neural networks: yield surface prediction based on microstructure images. Int J Plast 162:103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10350610.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103506 ↗
74. Lavech du Bos M, Balabdaoui F, Heidenreich JN (2020) Modeling stress-strain curves with neural networks: a scalable alternative to the return mapping algorithm. Comput Mater Sci 178:109629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10962910.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109629 ↗
75. Deb S, Muraleedharan A, Immanuel RJ et al (2022) Establishing flow stress behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy and development of constitutive models using Johnson-Cook method and artificial neural network for quasi-static and dynamic loading. Theor App Fract Mech 119:103338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.10333810.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103338 ↗
76. Ge G, Wang Z, Zhang L et al (2021) Hot deformation behavior and artificial neural network modeling of β-γ TiAl alloy containing high content of Nb. Mater Today Commun 27:102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10240510.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102405 ↗
77. Hu D, Wang L, Wang N et al (2022) Hot tensile deformation behaviors of TA32 titanium alloy based on back-propagation neural networks and three-dimensional thermal processing maps. J Mater Res Technol 18:4786–4795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.14410.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.144 ↗
78. Wan P, Zou H, Wang K et al (2020) Research on hot deformation behavior of Zr-4 alloy based on PSO-BP artificial neural network. J Alloy Compd 826:154047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15404710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154047 ↗
79. de Montes D, Lim H, Park T et al (2022) Predicting plastic anisotropy using crystal plasticity and Bayesian neural network surrogate models. Mater Sci Eng A 833:142472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.14247210.1016/j.msea.2021.142472 ↗
80. Zeng X (2024) A review on design of sustainable advanced materials by using artificial intelligence. Adv Mater Sustainable Manuf 1:10006. https://doi.org/10.35534/amsm.2024.1000610.35534/amsm.2024.10006 ↗
81. Ji C, Hu J, Wang B et al (2021) Mechanical behavior prediction of CF/PEEK-titanium hybrid laminates considering temperature effect by artificial neural network. Compos Struct 262:113367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11336710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113367 ↗
82. Kanakin VS, Smirnov AS, Konovalov AV (2022) Neural network modeling of the flow stress of the AlMg6/10% SiC metal matrix composite under deformation at high temperatures. Procedia Struct Integr 40:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2022.04.02610.1016/j.prostr.2022.04.026 ↗
83. Zhang T, Long Z, Peng L et al (2022) Prediction of glass forming ability of bulk metallic glasses based on convolutional neural network. J Non-Cryst Solids 595:121846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12184610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121846 ↗
84. Diamantopoulou M, Karathanasopoulos N, Mohr D (2021) Stress-strain response of polymers made through two-photon lithography: Micro-scale experiments and neural network modeling. Addit Manuf 47:102266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10226610.1016/j.addma.2021.102266 ↗
85. Meißner P, Watschke H, Winter J et al (2020) Artificial neural networks-based material parameter identification for numerical simulations of additively manufactured parts by material extrusion. Polymers 12:2949. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1212294910.3390/polym12122949 ↗
86. Chepurnenko A (2022) Determining the rheological parameters of polymers using artificial neural networks. Polymers 14:3977. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1419397710.3390/polym14193977 ↗
87. Settgast C, Hütter G, Kuna M et al (2020) A hybrid approach to simulate the homogenized irreversible elastic-plastic deformations and damage of foams by neural networks. Int J Plast 126:102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2019.11.003 ↗
88. Arama ZA, Yucel M, Akin MS et al (2021) A comparative study on the application of artificial intelligence networks versus regression analysis for the prediction of clay plasticity. Arab J Geosci 14:534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06894-x10.1007/s12517-021-06894-x ↗
89. Santosh S, Sampath V, Mouliswar RR (2022) Hot deformation characteristics of NiTiV shape memory alloy and modeling using constitutive equations and artificial neural networks. J Alloy Compd 901:163451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16345110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163451 ↗
90. Yates F (1937) The design and analysis of factorial experiments. Imperial Bureau of Soil Science, Harpenden, England
91. Modi B, Kumar DR (2019) Optimization of process parameters to enhance formability of AA 5182 alloy in deep drawing of square cups by hydroforming. J Mech Sci Technol 33:5337–5346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-019-1026-210.1007/s12206-019-1026-2 ↗
92. Teimouri R, Baseri H, Rahmani B et al (2014) Modeling and optimization of spring-back in bending process using multiple regression analysis and neural computation. Int J Mater Form 7:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-012-1117-410.1007/s12289-012-1117-4 ↗
93. Vorkov V, Aerens R, Vandepitte D et al (2019) Two regression approaches for prediction of large radius air bending. Int J Mater Form 12:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1422-710.1007/s12289-018-1422-7 ↗
94. Nasri MT, Abbassi F, Hamdeni T et al (2024) Novel approach for sheet metal constitutive parameters identification based on shape index and multiple regression. Results Eng 22:102267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10226710.1016/j.rineng.2024.102267 ↗
95. Alfaqs F, Marahleh GS (2021) Force and pressure function formulation for direct cold extrusion of aluminum alloy Al 1350 using regression method. Sci Bull Natl Min Univ 38–43. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-3/03810.33271/nvngu/2021-3/038 ↗
96. Alfaqs F, Marahleh GS (2022) Determination of force and pressure functions for backward cold extrusion of aluminum alloy 1350. Int Rev Mech Eng 16:139–146. https://doi.org/10.15866/ireme.v16i3.2205210.15866/ireme.v16i3.22052 ↗
97. Bao W, Gao J, Chu X et al (2022) Process optimization and mechanism analysis on electropulse-assisted incremental forming of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119:329–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08214-910.1007/s00170-021-08214-9 ↗
98. Zhao H, Han L, Liu Y et al (2021) Modelling and interaction analysis of the self-pierce riveting process using regression analysis and FEA. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113:159–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06519-910.1007/s00170-020-06519-9 ↗
99. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. Parallel distributed processing, Volume 1: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp 318–36210.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 ↗
100. Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. J Res Natl Bur Stand 49:409–436. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.049.04410.6028/jres.049.044 ↗