Prediction of non-uniform meshes for accelerated simulation of aluminum foam based on conditioned 3D U-Net
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Bensalem I, Benhizia A (2022) Novel design of irregular closed-cell foams structures based on spherical particle inflation and evaluation of its compressive performance. Thin-Walled Struct 181:109991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2022.10999110.1016/j.tws.2022.109991 ↗
2. Cui L, Xu X, Zhang Z, Ding J, Qiu Z et al (2025) Compression Fatigue Properties of Closed-Cell Aluminum Alloy Foams Fabricated by Two-Step Foaming Method. Adv Eng Mater 27(9):2402769. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240276910.1002/adem.202402769 ↗
3. Deng Y, Zhu Y, Zhao X (2026) Experimental and numerical investigation on quasi-static compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foams. J Mater Sci 61(1):556–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-025-11841-210.1007/s10853-025-11841-2 ↗
4. Islam MA, Hasib MA, Hasan M, Talapatra S (2022) Deformation behaviour and mechanical response of closed-cell cellular materials under projectile impact using various shapes impactors. Int J Automot Mech Eng 19(3):9982–9992. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijame.19.3.2022.10.077010.15282/ijame.19.3.2022.10.0770 ↗
5. Xiao S, Zhao Z, Duan S, Chen Y, Wang Y et al (2024) High temperature and mesostructure effect on aluminum foam compression responses. Int J Mech Sci 275:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10934410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109344 ↗
6. Yao Y, Xie L, Xi H, Rong Y, Mobasher B (2025) Strain rate and fracture analysis in closed-cell aluminum foams in tension: quasi-static to dynamic loads. Mater Today Commun 44:111959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11195910.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.111959 ↗
7. Yu H, Fang Q, Qian J, Hu Y (2023) Study on the yield behavior of closed-cell foams under multiaxial loads based on different yield definitions. Appl Sci -Basel 13(15):13158732. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1315873210.3390/app13158732 ↗
8. Qiu Q, Wang H, Ma W (2025) Experimental and analytical study on multiscale cushioning and energy absorption of aluminum foam at different strain rates. Appl Sci -Basel 15(5):2638. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1505263810.3390/app15052638 ↗
9. Saleem F, Li S, Cui S, Liu X, Xu T et al (2023) The strain rate and density dependence of the mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng a-Structural Mater Prop Microstruct Process 884:16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.14556810.1016/j.msea.2023.145568 ↗
10. Smyrnaios E, Tegos C, Stergioudi F, Maliaris G, Michailidis N (2023) Insights into building a digital twin of closed-cell aluminum foam during impact loading: microstructural, experimental and finite element investigations. J Mater Res Technol 27:2902–2911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.09410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.094 ↗
11. Tesfaye FA, Ali AN, Fenta EW (2025) Crashworthiness optimization of closed cell-sandwiched aluminum foam crash box using FE and ANN modeling. Eng Rep 7(9):70353. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.7035310.1002/eng2.70353 ↗
12. Balkrishna Tandale S, Markert B, Stoffel M (2022) Intelligent stiffness computation for plate and beam structures by neural network enhanced finite element analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 123(17):4001–4031. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.699610.1002/nme.6996 ↗
13. Feng N, Zhang G, Khandelwal K (2022) Finite strain FE2 analysis with data-driven homogenization using deep neural networks. Comput Struct 263:106742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2022.10674210.1016/j.compstruc.2022.106742 ↗
14. Han X, Sun X, Chen X (2023) Locally assembled stiffness matrix: a novel method to obtain global stiffness matrix. Acta Mech 234(6):2461–2480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-023-03507-410.1007/s00707-023-03507-4 ↗
15. Hu S, Luo X, Xiang W (2025) Integration of hierarchical quadrature element method with a minimum-increment remeshing strategy for simulating coupled thermo-mechanical fracture in quasi-brittle materials. Finite Elem Anal Des 251:19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2025.10443410.1016/j.finel.2025.104434 ↗
16. Liu X, Liu C, Ge J, Zhang D, Liang J (2024) Deep learning and integrated approach to reconstruct meshes from tomograms of 3D braided composites. Compos Sci Technol 255:110737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11073710.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110737 ↗
17. Ma J, Zhang W, Han Z, Xu Q, Zhao H (2024) An explainable deep learning model based on multi-scale microstructure information for establishing composition-microstructure-property relationship of aluminum alloys. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 13(3):827–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40192-024-00374-210.1007/s40192-024-00374-2 ↗
18. Moon G, Seo H-I, Seo D-H, Lee E (2023) Application of the convolutional neural network for classification of the aluminum alloys based on their microstructural characteristics. JOM 75(11):4858–4867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-06075-z10.1007/s11837-023-06075-z ↗
19. Xu Z, Cai B, Yan L, Pang X, Gao K (2024) Statistical analysis of metastable pitting behavior of 2024 aluminum alloy based on deep learning. Corros Sci 233:14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11207710.1016/j.corsci.2024.112077 ↗
20. Zhuang W, Wang E, Zhang H (2024) Prediction of the compressive mechanical properties and reverse structural design of two-dimensional mesoscopic aluminum foam based on deep learning methods. J Mater Sci 59(25):11416–11439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09866-010.1007/s10853-024-09866-0 ↗
21. Cheloee Darabi A, Rastgordani S, Khoshbin M, Guski V, Schmauder S (2023) Hybrid data-driven deep learning framework for material mechanical properties prediction with the focus on dual-phase steel microstructures. Materials (Basel) 16(1):447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1601044710.3390/ma16010447 ↗
22. Fu N, Omee SS, Hu J (2025) Physical encoding improves OOD performance in deep learning materials property prediction. Comput Mater Sci 248:113603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.11360310.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113603 ↗
23. Liu C, Li X, Ge J, Liu X, Li B et al (2024) A deep learning framework based on attention mechanism for predicting the mechanical properties and failure mode of embedded wrinkle fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Part a-Applied Sci Manuf 186:12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10840110.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108401 ↗
24. Park D, Park M, Ryu S (2023) Expanding design spaces in digital composite materials: a multi-input deep learning approach enhanced by transfer learning and multi-kernel network. Adv Theor Simul 6(11):2300465. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20230046510.1002/adts.202300465 ↗
25. Xue B, Wu Z (2022) Defect detection and classification algorithm of metal nanomaterials based on deep learning. Integr Ferroelectr 226(1):277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584587.2022.206556810.1080/10584587.2022.2065568 ↗
26. Zhang B, Luo X, Lyu Y, Wu X, Wen W (2022) A defect detection method for topological phononic materials based on few-shot learning. New J Phys 24(8):1068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac830710.1088/1367-2630/ac8307 ↗
27. Tseng B-Y, Chen Y-W, Loo H-H, Hsiao C-H, Tsai C-S et al (2025) Optimizing Bioinspired Composite Materials Using Deep Q-Network Reinforcement Learning and Finite Element Methods. Adv Eng Mater 27(22):202402807. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20240280710.1002/adem.202402807 ↗
28. Xin R, Le VT, Goo NS (2024) Prediction of the buckling mode of cylindrical composite shells with imperfections using FEM-based deep learning approach. Adv Compos Mater 33(2):189–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2023.222412910.1080/09243046.2023.2224129 ↗
29. Sprave J, Drescher C (2021) Evaluating the quality of finite element meshes with machine learning. arXiv 2107:10507. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.1050710.48550/arXiv.2107.10507 ↗
30. Hu D, Hu Y, Hu R, Tan Z, Ni P et al (2025) Machine Learning-Finite Element Mesh Optimization-Based Modeling and Prediction of Excavation-Induced Shield Tunnel Ground Settlement. Int J Comput Methods 22(04):2450066. https://doi.org/10.1142/s021987622450066x10.1142/s021987622450066x ↗
31. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Jimack PK, Wang H (2020) MeshingNet: A New Mesh Generation Method Based on Deep Learning. Comput Sci – ICCS 2020:186–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50420-51410.1007/978-3-030-50420-514 ↗
32. Chan CL, Scholz F, Takacs T (2022) Locally refined quad meshing for linear elasticity problems based on convolutional neural networks. Eng Comput 38(5):4631–4652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01677-810.1007/s00366-022-01677-8 ↗
33. Bohn J, Feischl M (2021) Recurrent neural networks as optimal mesh refinement strategies. Comput Math Appl 97:61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2021.05.01810.1016/j.camwa.2021.05.018 ↗
34. Foucart C, Charous A, Lermusiaux PFJ (2023) Deep reinforcement learning for adaptive mesh refinement. J Comput Phys 491:112381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2023.11238110.1016/j.jcp.2023.112381 ↗
35. Kim I, Kim S, You D (2024) Non-iterative generation of an optimal mesh for a blade passage using deep reinforcement learning. Comput Phys Commun 294:108962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.10896210.1016/j.cpc.2023.108962 ↗
36. Zhuang W, Wang E (2022) Simulation study on the effect of trapped gas on the dynamic compressive stress enhancement of aluminium foam. Mech Mater 169:104319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.10431910.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104319 ↗
37. Guo Q, Li W, Yao W, Huang CJM (2021) Mechanical properties and constitutive model applied to the high-speed impact of aluminum foam that considers its meso-structural parameters. Materials 14(20):6206. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1420620610.3390/ma14206206 ↗
38. Vengatachalam B, Poh LH, Liu ZS, Qin QH, Swaddiwudhipong S (2019) Three dimensional modelling of closed-cell aluminium foams with predictive macroscopic behaviour. Mech Mater 136:103061–103067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2019.10306710.1016/j.mechmat.2019.103067 ↗
39. Zhuang W, Wang E, Zhang D, Zhang H (2023) Mesoscale study on the mechanical properties and energy absorption characteristics of aluminum foam-filled CFRP tubes under axial compression. Mech Adv Mater Struct 31(28):10330–10346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2023.228718410.1080/15376494.2023.2287184 ↗
40. Meseguer-Brocal G, Peeters G (2019) Conditioned-U-Net: Introducing a Control Mechanism in the U-Net for Multiple Source Separations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.01277. arXiv 1907:0127710.48550/arXiv.1907.01277 ↗
41. Huang X, Belongie S (2017) Arbitrary style transfer in real-time with adaptive instance normalization. arXiv 1703:06868. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.0686810.48550/arXiv.1703.06868 ↗
42. Karras T, Laine S, Aila T (2018) A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. arXiv 1812:04948. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.0494810.48550/arXiv.1812.04948 ↗
43. Zhuang W, Wang E, Zhang H (2023) Prediction of compressive mechanical properties of three-dimensional mesoscopic aluminium foam based on deep learning method. Mech Mater 182:104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.10468410.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104684 ↗
44. Gupta P, Tarafdar A, Basu T, Shaikh A, Bhattacharya P (2024) Optimizing 3D U-Net for Brain MRI Segmentation: MARCOS and MAIRCA-Based Hyperparameter Tuning. 2024 IEEE Silchar Subsection Conference (SILCON 2024) 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/silcon63976.2024.1091056210.1109/silcon63976.2024.10910562 ↗