Multi objective optimization of stamping process parameters based on improved ASAE-GP-BPNN hybrid model and NSGA-II algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Stamping-forming parameter optimization is a core technical hurdle in enhancing product quality. To tackle the low accuracy of existing surrogate models and the uneven Pareto fronts produced by current multi-objective algorithms, this paper introduces a novel framework that couples an Adaptive Sparse Autoencoder–Gaussian Process–Back-Propagation Neural Network (ASAE-GP-BPNN) hybrid surrogate model with an improved Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (INSGA-II). ASAE-GP-BPNN achieves accurate modeling of complex nonlinear relationships through competitive sparse mechanism for dynamic feature extraction, Gaussian process uncertainty quantification, and BPNN deep fusion, showing 15–40% improvement over single models on test functions. INSGA-II introduces K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN) local density evaluation and adaptive parameter strategy, increasing the hypervolume of Pareto front by about 15%. Using TRIP780 double C-shaped parts as a case study, the surrogate model was trained with 120 groups of Latin hypercube sampling data. After optimization, the optimal process parameter combination was obtained achieving maximum thinning rate of 11.3%, thickening area of 4.6%, springback amount of 0.952 mm, and 20% reduction in overall defects. The research shows that the proposed method has both prediction accuracy and engineering applicability in high-dimensional nonlinear stamping process multi-objective optimization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Topology Optimization in Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Gao M, Huang H, Wang Q et al (2018) Energy consumption analysis on sheet metal forming: focusing on the deep drawing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:3893–3907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1735-110.1007/s00170-018-1735-1 ↗
2. Ma W-y et al. (2018) Analysis and multi-objective optimization on the stamping of high strength steel. https://doi.org/10.2991/caai-18.2018.5210.2991/caai-18.2018.52 ↗
3. Ul Hassan H, Maqbool F, Güner A et al (2016) Springback prediction and reduction in deep drawing under influence of unloading modulus degradation. Int J Mater Form 9:619–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1248-510.1007/s12289-015-1248-5 ↗
4. Xuejun J, Yu G et al (2020) A review of current state and prospect of the manufacturing and application of advanced hot stamping automobile steels[J]. Acta Metall Sin 56(4):411–428 ((INchina))
5. Li YT, Chen YQ, Li QY (2021) Multi-objective optimization on hot stamping process for vehicle A-pillar reinforced plate by NSGA-II. Forging Stamp Technol 46(2):59–65 ((in Chinese))
6. Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R, Micari F (2009) Analysis of stamping performances of dual phase steels: a multi-objective approach to reduce springback and thinning failure. Mater Des 30(10):4421–4433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.00110.1016/j.matdes.2009.04.001 ↗
7. Azaouzi M, Lebaal N, Rauchs G et al (2012) Optimal design of multi-step stamping tools based on response surface method. Simul Model Pract Theory 24:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2012.01.00610.1016/j.simpat.2012.01.006 ↗
8. Yan G, Zheng Y, Wang L et al. (2020) Optimization of stamping process parameters based on orthogonal test and intelligent algorithm[C]//2020 3rd World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM). IEEE, 393–397. https://doi.org/10.1109/WCMEIM52463.2020.0008910.1109/WCMEIM52463.2020.00089 ↗
9. Xie Y, Du L, Zhao J et al (2021) Multi-objective optimization of process parameters in stamping based on an improved RBM-BPNN network and MOPSO algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim 64(6):4209–4235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03056-110.1007/s00158-021-03056-1 ↗
10. Williams CKI, Rasmussen CE (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT press, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.000110.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 ↗
11. Cerda-Flores SC, Rojas-Punzo AA, Nápoles-Rivera F (2022) Applications of multi-objective optimization to industrial processes: a literature review. Processes 10(1):133. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1001013310.3390/pr10010133 ↗
12. Gao M, Wang Q, Li L et al (2020) Energy-economizing optimization of magnesium alloy hot stamping process. Processes 8(2):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr802018610.3390/pr8020186 ↗
13. Bao L, Zheng M, Zhou Q et al (2022) Multi-objective optimization of partition temperature of steel sheet by NSGA-II using response surface methodology. Case Stud Therm Eng 31:101818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.10181810.1016/j.csite.2022.101818 ↗
14. Cui M, Wang Z, Wang L et al (2020) Numerical simulation and multi-objective optimization of partition cooling in hot stamping of the automotive B-pillar based on RSM and NSGA-II. Metals 10(9):1264. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1009126410.3390/met10091264 ↗
15. Zhang P, Qian Y, Qian Q (2021) Multi-objective optimization for materials design with improved NSGA-II. Mater Today Commun 28:102709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.10270910.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102709 ↗
16. Zhang Z, Wu F, Wu A (2024) Research on multi-objective process parameter optimization method in hard turning based on an improved NSGA-II algorithm. Processes 12(5):950. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1205095010.3390/pr12050950 ↗
17. Ni H, Yan C, Ge W et al (2022) Integrated optimization of cutting parameters and hob parameters for energy-conscious gear hobbing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 118(5):1609–1626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07804-x10.1007/s00170-021-07804-x ↗
18. Xie Y, Li W, Liu C et al (2023) Optimization of stamping process parameters based on improved GA-BP neural network model. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 24(7):1129–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00811-w10.1007/s12541-023-00811-w ↗
19. Xie Y, Liu C et al (2024) Optimization of stamping process parameters based on an improved particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm and sparse auto-encoder-back-propagation neural network model[J]. Eng Optimization 56(2):252–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2022.215201810.1080/0305215X.2022.2152018 ↗
20. Li L, Chen S, Gong Z et al (2019) A novel hybrid multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm with an adaptive resource allocation strategy. IEEE Access 7:177082–177100. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.295763710.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957637 ↗
21. Hou CKJ, Behdinan K (2022) Dimensionality reduction in surrogate modeling: a review of combined methods. Data Sci Eng 7:402–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-022-00193-510.1007/s41019-022-00193-5 ↗
22. Guo G, Wang H, Bell D et al. (2003) KNN model-based approach in classification[C]//OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems". Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_6210.1007/978-3-540-39964-3_62 ↗
23. Li M, Yang S, Liu X (2013) Shift-based density estimation for Pareto-based algorithms in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 18(3):348–365. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.226217810.1109/TEVC.2013.2262178 ↗
24. Glamsch J, Rosnitschek T, Rieg F (2021) Initial population influence on hypervolume convergence of NSGA-III. Int J Simulation Modell 20(1):123–133. https://doi.org/10.2507/IJSIMM20-1-54910.2507/IJSIMM20-1-549 ↗
25. Zhang Q, Li H (2007) MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(6):712–731. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.89275910.1109/TEVC.2007.892759 ↗
26. Huband S, Hingston P, Barone L et al (2006) A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10(5):477–506. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2005.86141710.1109/TEVC.2005.861417 ↗
27. Deb K, Thiele L, Laumanns M et al. (2005) Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization[M]//Evolutionary multiobjective optimization: theoretical advances and applications. London: Springer London 105–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-137-7_610.1007/1-84628-137-7_6 ↗
28. Han X, Zhang H, Li Y et al (2019) Investigation of the hot stamping process for TRIP steel with high strength and high ductility. J Mater Eng Perform 28(10):6125–6134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04325-310.1007/s11665-019-04325-3 ↗
29. Zhang H, Wei W, Long S et al (2025) Optimization of stamping process parameters for sustainable manufacturing: Numerical simulation based on AutoForm. Sustainability 17(1):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1701034110.3390/su17010341 ↗
30. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (2000) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 42(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2000.1048597910.1080/00401706.2000.10485979 ↗