Investigation of springback behavior in creep age forming of AA2024 sheets used in the aerospace industry
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Although inverse relationships among sheet thickness, forming pressure, and springback are widely reported in the creep-age forming (CAF) literature, limited statistically validated experimental data exist for AA2024 undergoing a T3-T81 transformation under industrial autoclave conditions. This study experimentally investigates and parametrically assesses the springback behavior of AA2024-T3 sheets, focusing on the comparative sensitivity of thickness (0.81–1.6 mm) and pressure (6–9 bar). Two-factor ANOVA confirmed statistically significant main effects for both parameters ( p < 0.001), while a multiple linear regression model (R 2 = 98.27%) was developed to quantify their influence. The independence of these predictors was verified using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) analysis (VIF = 1.00). The results show that springback decreases from 68.4% to 53.0% over the investigated window, a trend fundamentally driven by stress-relaxation kinetics and the precipitation of fine S′ phases that stabilize the microstructure. Furthermore, thickness thinning remained negligible (< 1%), and the achievement of the T81 state was confirmed by hardness and electrical conductivity measurements. While the model provides a robust tool for preliminary mold compensation, its applicability is limited to the evaluated industrial parameter space and cylindrical geometry. These findings provide statistically supported guidance for optimizing CAF processes in aerospace structural applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Brewer H (1989) Age forming integrally stiffened aluminum aerospace structures in an autoclave. Aircraft Design and Operations Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), Seattle, WA, AIAA-89-2090, 198910.2514/6.1989-2087 ↗
2. Holman MC (1989) Autoclave age forming large aluminum aircraft panels. J Mech Working Technol 19:477–48810.1016/0378-3804(89)90055-7 ↗
3. T. Adachi, S. Kimura, T. Nagayama, H. Takehisa, and M. Shimanuki, Age Forming Technology for Aircraft Wing Skin, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys (ICAA9), Brisbane, Australia, 2004, pp. 245–250
4. Zhan L, Lin J, Dean TA (2011) A review of the development of creep age forming: Experimentation, modelling and applications. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(1):1–1710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.08.007 ↗
5. Ho KC, Lin J, Dean TA (2004) Modelling of springback in creep forming thick aluminum sheets. Int J Plast 20:733–75110.1016/S0749-6419(03)00078-0 ↗
6. Jeunechamps P-P, Ho KC, Lin J, Ponthot J-P, Dean TA (2006) A closed-form technique to predict springback in creep age-forming. Int J Mech Sci 48:621–62910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.01.005 ↗
7. Brandao FM, Delijaicov S, Bortolussi R (2017) CAF: A simplified approach to calculate springback in Al 7050 alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3273–328410.1007/s00170-016-9839-y ↗
8. Yang Y-L, Zhan L-H, Li J (2015) Constitutive modeling and springback simulation for 2524 aluminum alloy in creep age forming. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25(10):3048–305510.1016/S1003-6326(15)63932-2 ↗
9. Li Y, Rong Q, Shi Z, Sun X, Meng L, Lin J (2019) An accelerated springback compensation method for creep age forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103:121–13410.1007/s00170-018-3175-3 ↗
10. Age forming project brochure. Available at 16 October 2010 on http://www.scribd.com/doc/37472248/AgeForm
11. Robey RF, Prangnell PB, Dif R (2004) Comparison of the stress relaxation behaviour of three aluminium aerospace alloys for use in age-forming applications. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aluminium Alloys
12. Xu XL, Zhan LH, Li YG, Huang MH (2013) Constitutive modelling and springback prediction for creep age forming of 2124 aluminium alloy. Mater Sci Technol 29:1253–126110.1179/1743284713Y.0000000274 ↗
13. Zhang J, Deng Y-L, Li S-Y, Chen Z-Y, Zhang X-M (2013) Creep age forming of 2124 aluminum alloy with single/double curvature. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(7):1922–192910.1016/S1003-6326(13)62678-3 ↗
14. Zhan L, Tan S, Yang Y, Huang M, Shen W, Zhao X (2014) Research on the creep age forming of 2524 aluminum alloy: Springback, mechanical properties, and microstructures. Adv Mech Eng 6:1–1110.1155/2014/707628 ↗
15. J. G. Kaufman (2000) Introduction to Aluminum Alloys and Tempers, ASM International, Materials Park, OH
16. Inforzato DJ, Junior PRC, Travessa DN (2012) Creep-age forming of AA7475 aluminum panels for aircraft lower wing skin application. Mater Res 15(4):596–60210.1590/S1516-14392012005000080 ↗
17. Quan L-W, Zhao G, Tian N, Huang M-L (2012) Effect of stress on microstructures of creep-aged 2524 alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 558:32–38
18. Chen JF, Zhen L, Jiang JT, Yang L, Shao WZ, Zhang BY (2012) Microstructures and mechanical properties of age-formed 7050 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 551:204–212
19. SAE International AMS 2770 (2023) Heat Treatment of wrought aluminum alloy parts, SAE International
20. ASTM International, ASTM E10-22 (2022) Standard test method for brinell hardness of metallic materials, ASTM International
21. ASTM International, ASTM E1004 (2022) Standard test method for determining electrical conductivity using the electromagnetic (eddy-current) method, ASTM International
22. SAE International, AMS 2658 (2023) Inspection, ultrasonic, wrought metals, process for, SAE International