journal article·2026-03Open access

Rotating die extrusion of continuous fiber-reinforced polymer filaments

Simone Giovane, Francesco Borda, Giuseppe Serratore, Domenico Mundo, Francesco Gagliardi

Abstract

Abstract Continuous fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) offer high strength-to-weight ratios, which makes them an attractive choice for applications in transportation, biomedical devices, and sports equipment. Additive manufacturing presents new opportunities for producing CFRPs with improved geometric freedom and digital fabrication flexibility. However, achieving adequate fiber impregnation and strong interfacial bonding remains a major challenge. This paper presents a novel rotating impregnation die, patented by some of the authors, designed to produce fiber-reinforced polymer filaments at a die speed of 15 rad/s. These filaments, characterized by a final diameter of 0.65 mm and a fiber volume fraction of 5.4%, are compatible with fused deposition modelling for 3D printing. The die is engineered to improve polymer–fiber interaction during filament fabrication. Specifically, its rotating geometry induces a swirling flow pattern in the molten polymer, which enhances fiber wetting and promotes partial fiber interlacing. The performance of the system was evaluated through both numerical simulations and experimental tests. In the computational fluid dynamics analysis, an inlet velocity of 5 mm/s was imposed, showing that the rotational motion generates a tangential velocity component that improves fiber-polymer interaction and locally reduces viscosity at the fiber surface, leveraging the shear-thinning behaviour of the polymer. This results in improved impregnation efficiency without affecting the internal pressure of the die. Two filament configurations were produced for comparison: one using the rotating impregnation die PLAGF-B (PolyLactic Acid – Glass Fiber Braided) and one using a static die PLAGF-UB (PolyLactic Acid – Glass Fiber UnBraided). The produced filaments consisted of three glass-fiber bundles impregnated with PLA resin and were subjected to standard tensile testing, after being pulled at a controlled speed of 6 mm/s. The PLAGF-B samples exhibited higher tensile strength (~ 70 MPa vs. ~60 MPa) and elongation at break (~ 0.023 mm/mm vs. ~0.018 mm/mm), attributed to enhanced twisting and compaction induced by the die’s rotation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer Foaming and Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang J, Zhou Z, Zhang F et al (2020) Performance of 3D-printed continuous-carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics with pressure. Materials 13:471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1302047110.3390/ma13020471 ↗
2. Luo M, Tian X, Shang J et al (2019) Impregnation and interlayer bonding behaviours of 3D-printed continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 121:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.020 ↗
3. Wu Y, Wang K, Neto V et al (2022) Interfacial behaviors of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymers manufactured by fused filament fabrication: a review and prospect. Int J Mater Form 15:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-022-01667-710.1007/s12289-022-01667-7 ↗
4. Safari F, Kami A, Abedini V (2022) 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced composites: a review of the processing, pre- and post-processing effects on mechanical properties. Polym Polym Compos. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391122109873410.1177/09673911221098734 ↗
5. Cheng P, Peng Y, Li S et al (2023) 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced composite lightweight structures: a review and outlook. Compos B Eng 250:110450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110450 ↗
6. Castelló-Pedrero P, García-Gascón C, García-Manrique JA (2024) Multiscale numerical modeling of large-format additive manufacturing processes using carbon fiber reinforced polymer for digital twin applications. Int J Mater Form 17:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-024-01811-510.1007/s12289-024-01811-5 ↗
7. Xu J, Gao M, Zhan J et al (2022) Towards support-free design for 3D printing of thin-walled composite based on stratified manufacturability reinforcement. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 38:457–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2022.05.01710.1016/j.cirpj.2022.05.017 ↗
8. Mammadov B, Mohammadi Y, Farahani ND, Altintas Y (2024) A unified FFT-based mechanistic force coefficient identification model for isotropic and anisotropic materials. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 49:216–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.01.00910.1016/j.cirpj.2024.01.009 ↗
9. Dou H, Cheng Y, Ye W et al (2020) Effect of process parameters on tensile mechanical properties of 3D printing continuous carbon fiber-reinforced PLA composites. Materials 13:3850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1317385010.3390/ma13173850 ↗
10. Baley C, Gomina M, Breard J et al (2019) Specific features of flax fibres used to manufacture composite materials. Int J Mater Form 12:1023–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1455-y10.1007/s12289-018-1455-y ↗
11. Horta JF, Simões FJP, Mateus A (2018) Large scale additive manufacturing of eco-composites. Int J Mater Form 11:375–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1364-510.1007/s12289-017-1364-5 ↗
12. Kim S-E, Ahn J-G, Ahn S et al (2022) Development of PA6/GF long-fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites using pultrusion and direct extrusion manufacturing processes. Appl Sci 12:4838. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1210483810.3390/app12104838 ↗
13. Tipboonsri P, Wattanahitsiri V, Memon A (2021) Long fiber thermoplastic pellets of glass fiber/polypropylene from pultrusion process. J Phys Conf Ser 1719:012066. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/01206610.1088/1742-6596/1719/1/012066 ↗
14. Tian X, Liu T, Wang Q et al (2017) Recycling and remanufacturing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. J Clean Prod 142:1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
15. Liu T, Liu L, Yu M et al (2018) Integrative hinge based on shape memory polymer composites: material, design, properties and application. Compos Struct 206:164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.04110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.041 ↗
16. Deswal S, Kaushik A, Garg RK et al (2024) Optimization of fused deposition modelling printing parameters using hybrid GA-fuzzy evolutionary algorithm. Sādhanā 49:257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02595-910.1007/s12046-024-02595-9 ↗
17. Liu K, Zhang B, Xu X, Ye J (2019) Experimental characterization and analysis of fiber orientations in hemispherical thermostamping for unidirectional thermoplastic composites. Int J Mater Form 12:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-018-1410-y10.1007/s12289-018-1410-y ↗
18. Slamani M, Karabibene N, Chatelain J-F, Beauchamp Y (2021) Edge trimming of flax fibers and glass fibers reinforced polymers composite – an experimental comparative evaluation. IntJ Mater Form 14:1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-021-01644-610.1007/s12289-021-01644-6 ↗
19. Torrado AR, Shemelya CM, English JD et al (2015) Characterizing the effect of additives to ABS on the mechanical property anisotropy of specimens fabricated by material extrusion 3D printing. Addit Manuf 6:16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.00110.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 ↗
20. Heidari-Rarani M, Rafiee-Afarani M, Zahedi AM (2019) Mechanical characterization of FDM 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Compos Part B Eng 175:107147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
21. Zhang H, Huang T, Jiang Q et al (2021) Recent progress of 3D printed continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites based on fused deposition modeling: a review. J Mater Sci 56:12999–13022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-021-06111-w10.1007/s10853-021-06111-w ↗
22. Ueda M, Kishimoto S, Yamawaki M et al (2020) 3D compaction printing of a continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 137:105985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10598510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105985 ↗
23. Sugiyama K, Matsuzaki R, Malakhov AV et al (2020) 3D printing of optimized composites with variable fiber volume fraction and stiffness using continuous fiber. Compos Sci Technol 186:107905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10790510.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107905 ↗
24. Van DeWerken N , Koirala P, Ghorbani J et al (2019) Improving properties of additively manufactured carbon fiber composites via post pressing. Mater Sci, Eng 210796235. https://doi.org/10.12783/asc34/3129810.12783/asc34/31298 ↗
25. Qiao J, Li Y, Li L (2019) Ultrasound-assisted 3D printing of continuous fiber-reinforced thermoplastic (FRTP) composites. Addit Manuf 30:100926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.10092610.1016/j.addma.2019.100926 ↗
26. Li H, Liu B, Ge L et al (2021) Mechanical performances of continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites printed in vacuum. Compos Part B Eng 225:109277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10927710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109277 ↗
27. Shchemelinin Y, Nelson JW, Ryan C et al (2023) Hydraulic bulge testing to compare formability of continuous and stretch broken carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Mater Form 16:21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01743-610.1007/s12289-023-01743-6 ↗
28. Cano-Vicent A, Tambuwala MM, Hassan S et al (2021) Fused deposition modelling: current status, methodology, applications and future prospects. Addit Manuf 47:102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.10237810.1016/j.addma.2021.102378 ↗
29. Chen Y, Ye L (2021) Topological design for 3D-printing of carbon fibre reinforced composite structural parts. Compos Sci Technol 204:108644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10864410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108644 ↗
30. Borda F, La Rosa AD, Filice L, Gagliardi F (2023) Environmental impact of process constrained topology optimization design on automotive component’ life. Int J Mater Form 16:48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01771-210.1007/s12289-023-01771-2 ↗
31. Quan C, Han B, Hou Z et al (2020) 3d printed continuous fiber reinforced composite auxetic honeycomb structures. Compos Part B Eng 187:107858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10785810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107858 ↗
32. Matsuzaki R, Ueda M, Namiki M et al (2016) Three-dimensional printing of continuous-fiber composites by in-nozzle impregnation. Sci Rep 6:23058. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
33. Der Van KF, Koga Y, Todoroki A et al (2016) 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced Thermo-Plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens. Open J Compos Mater 06:18–27. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2016.6100310.4236/ojcm.2016.61003 ↗
34. Mark GT (2013) Methods for fiber reinforced additive manufacturing (Patent n. WO2014197732A2)
35. Mark GT, Gozdz AS (2015) Three dimensional printer for fiber reinforced composite filament fabrication
36. Azarov AV, Antonov FK et al (2017) Production of articles made of composite materials by 3D-printing method
37. Cole N-C, Frei J (2016) Additive manufacturing techniques and systems to form composite materials
38. Farmer B, Kessler W, Meyer J, Hawkins A (2014) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing
39. Bernd H, Wagner B, Borgner T et al (2004) Method of making long fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites utilizing hybrid or commingled yarn
40. Gregg R, Bogucki (2020) Extruded deposition of fiber reinforced polymers
41. Koerblein, G (2005) Multi-stage coating device for moulded bodies. US20090220676A1
42. Serratore G, Gagliardi F, Mundo D (2023) Extrusion device and 3D printer
43. Chokshi S, Gohil P (2022) Experimental investigation and mathematical modeling of longitudinally placed natural fiber reinforced polymeric composites including interphase volume fraction. Fibers Polym 23:488–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-021-2087-210.1007/s12221-021-2087-2 ↗
44. Moradi M, Aminzadeh A, Rahmatabadi D, Rasouli SA (2021) Statistical and experimental analysis of process parameters of 3D nylon printed parts by fused deposition modeling: response surface modeling and optimization. J Mater Eng Perform 30:5441–5454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05848-410.1007/s11665-021-05848-4 ↗
45. OpenFOAM Foundation (2024) OpenFOAM v12 User Guide
46. Brodkey RS, Hershey HC (1988) Transport phenomena: a unified approach. Brodkey Publishing, pp 327–333
47. Mohan A, Tomar G (2024) Volume of fluid method: a brief review. J Indian Inst Sci 104:229–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-024-00424-w10.1007/s41745-024-00424-w ↗
48. Tryggvason G, Scardovelli R, Zaleski S (2001) Direct Numerical Simulations of Gas–Liquid Multiphase Flows. Cambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511975264 ↗
49. Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R (2016) Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications — a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 107:367–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.01210.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
50. Carreau PJ (1972) Rheological equations from molecular network theories. Trans Soc Rheol 16:99–127. https://doi.org/10.1122/1.54927610.1122/1.549276 ↗
51. Gan X, Wang Z, Xing Z et al (2023) Analysis of the Carreau Model Mixed Mechanism with a Stir Shaft in Color FDM Printing. Processes 11:559. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1102055910.3390/pr11020559 ↗
52. La G, Yi K, Ko D, Kim K (2025) Verification and validation of CFD analysis for 1/7th scale model of APR1400 for CVAP. Nucl Eng Technol 57(2):103192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2024.08.06110.1016/j.net.2024.08.061 ↗
53. OpenFOAM F (2019) OpenFOAM: User Guide, version v1912. The Open Source CFD Toolbox. https://www.openfoam.com
54. Chadil M-A, Vincent S, Estivalèzes J-L (2019) Improvement of the viscous penalty method for Particle-Resolved simulations. Open J Fluid Dynamics 09:168–192. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2019.9201210.4236/ojfd.2019.92012 ↗
55. Ngo ND, Tamma KK (2001) Microscale permeability predictions of porous fibrous media. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:3135–3145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(00)00335-510.1016/S0017-9310(00)00335-5 ↗
56. Zhang J, Yang W, Li Y (2023) Process-dependent multiscale modeling for 3D printing of continuous fiber-reinforced composites. Addit Manuf 73:103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.10368010.1016/j.addma.2023.103680 ↗
57. Baché E, Dupleix-Couderc C, Arquis E, Berdoyes I (2018) Impregnation of composite materials: a numerical study. Appl Compos Mater 25:1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-017-9666-910.1007/s10443-017-9666-9 ↗
58. Gebart BR (1992) Permeability of unidirectional reinforcements for RTM. J Compos Mater 26:1100–1133. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983920260080210.1177/002199839202600802 ↗
59. Song X (2000) Modeling of thermoplastic composite filament winding
60. Shamsuri AA, Darus SAAZM (2020) Statistical Analysis of Tensile Strength and Flexural Strength Data from Universal Testing Machine. Asian J Probab Stat 54–62. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajpas/2020/v9i33023010.9734/ajpas/2020/v9i330230 ↗