Characterising the shear, stretch and in-plane bending response of a pure-unidirectional non-crimp fabric
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The in-plane deformation kinematics of a pure-Unidirectional Non-Crimp Fabric (pure-UDNCF) is investigated using novel and existing experimental methods to characterise its shear, tensile, and in-plane bending responses under controlled loading. A pure-UDNCF is defined as a fabric in which stabilising tows are absent in the transverse direction relative to the primary tow orientation. The stitching threads in this fabric are made of polyamide, a highly compliant material that allows significant stretch, introducing a low-energy deformation mode that is relatively absent in biaxial engineering fabrics and quasi-UDNCFs (UDNCFs with inextensible stitching and transverse stabilising fibres). To fully characterise its forming behaviour, several novel testing methods are introduced that generate well-defined combinations of fabric shear, in-plane bending and stitch tensile strain. The total normalised axial force measured in the tests is subsequently decoupled into three contributions from shear, tensile strain in the stitch direction, and in-plane bending of the tows. An important finding is that when tested in the picture frame test, in-plane bending generates more resistance to specimen deformation than shearing of the fabric. The testing protocol and resulting data can be used to create appropriate constitutive models for pure-UDNCFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Loos M (2015) Chapter 2 - Composites. Carbon Nanotube Reinforced Composites. William Andrew Publishing, pp 37–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2012-0-06123-610.1016/C2012-0-06123-6 ↗
2. Callister W, Rethwisch D (2000) Fundamentals of materials science and engineering. Wiley, London
3. Schrank V, Beer M, Beckers M, Gries T (2017) Polymer-optical fibre (POF) integration into textile fabric structures. Polymer optical fibres. Woodhead Publishing, pp 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100039-7.00010-510.1016/B978-0-08-100039-7.00010-5 ↗
4. Abdullah SS, Iannucci L, Greenhalgh ES, Abdullah NA (2022) The delamination behaviour of Vectran/Epoxy composites having a novel non-crimp fabric architecture. Compos Part B Eng 228:109413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10941310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109413 ↗
5. Bozkurt E, Kaya E, Tanoğlu M (2007) Mechanical and thermal behavior of non-crimp glass fiber reinforced layered clay/epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 67:15–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2007.03.021 ↗
6. Chen S, Joesbury AM, Yu F, Harper LT, Warrior NA (2022) Optimisation of intra-ply stitch removal for improved formability of biaxial non-crimp fabrics. Compos Part B Eng 229:109464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10946410.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109464 ↗
7. Colin D, Bel S, Hans T, Hartmann M, Drechsler K (2020) Virtual description of non-crimp fabrics at the scale of filaments including orientation variability in the fibrous layers. Appl Compos Mater 27(4):337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-020-09819-110.1007/s10443-020-09819-1 ↗
8. Krieger H, Gries T, Stapleton SE (2018) Shear and drape behavior of non-crimp fabrics based on stitching geometry. IntJ Mater Form 11(5):593–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1368-110.1007/s12289-017-1368-1 ↗
9. Chen S, McGregor OPL, Harper LT, Endruwei A, Warrior NA (2016) Defect formation during preforming of a bi-axial non-crimp fabric with a pillar stitch pattern. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufac 91:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2016.09.016 ↗
10. Bardl G, Nocke A, Hübner M, Pooch M, Schulze M, Heuer H, Schiller M, Kupke R, Klein M (2018) Analysis of the 3D draping behavior of carbon fiber non-crimp fabrics with eddy current technique. Compos Part B: Eng 132:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.00710.1016/j.compositesb.2017.08.007 ↗
11. Krogh C, Kepler JA, Jakobsen J (2021) Pure and simple: investigating the in-plane shear kinematics of a quasi-unidirectional glass fiber non-crimp fabric using the bias-extension test. IntJ Mater Form 14(6):1483–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-021-01642-810.1007/s12289-021-01642-8 ↗
12. Schirmaier FJ, Weidenmann KA, Kärger L, Henning F (2016) Characterisation of the draping behaviour of unidirectional non-crimp fabrics (UD-NCF). Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.004 ↗
13. Ghazimoradi M, Trejo EA, Carvelli V, Butcher C, Montesano J (2021) Deformation characteristics and formability of a tricot-stitched carbon fiber unidirectional non-crimp fabric. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 145:106366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10636610.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106366 ↗
14. Härtel F, Harrison P (2014) Evaluation of normalisation methods for uniaxial bias extension tests on engineering fabrics. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.011 ↗
15. Kahavita KDHN, McCarthy ED, Zhang M, Ó Brádaigh CM, Harrison P (2023) Characterising the shear resistance of a unidirectional non-crimp glass fabric using modified picture frame and uniaxial bias extension test methods. Int J Mater Form. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01765-010.1007/s12289-023-01765-0 ↗
16. Senner T, Kreissl S, Merklein M, Meinhardt J, Lipp A (2014) A modular modeling approach for describing the in-plane forming behavior of unidirectional non-crimp-fabrics. Prod Eng 8:635–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0561-z10.1007/s11740-014-0561-z ↗
17. Bhat S, Dittel G, Knobel A, Gries T (2022) Investigation of the drapability of elastic-adapted textile reinforcements for double-curved concrete panels, in SAMPE EUROPE Conference and Exhibition 2022, Hamburg. https://www.nasampe.org/store/viewproduct.aspx?id=23969913
18. Tong L, Mouritz AP, Bannister MK (2002) 3D fibre reinforced polymer composites. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-043938-9.X5012-110.1016/B978-0-08-043938-9.X5012-1 ↗
19. Schirmaier FJ, Dörr D, Henning F, Kärger L (2017) A macroscopic approach to simulate the forming behaviour of stitched unidirectional non-crimp fabrics (UD-NCF). Compos A 102:322–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2017.08.009 ↗
20. Ghazimoradi M, Trejo EA, Butcher C, Montesano J (2022) Characterizing the macroscopic response and local deformation mechanisms of a unidirectional non-crimp fabric. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 156:106857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10685710.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106857 ↗
21. Schäfer B, Zheng R, Naouar N, Kärger L (2023) Membrane behavior of uni- and bidirectional non-crimp fabrics in off-axis-tension tests. Int J Mater Form 16(6):68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01792-x10.1007/s12289-023-01792-x ↗
22. Spencer AJM, Soldatos KP (2007) Finite deformations of fibre-reinforced elastic solids with fibre bending stiffness. Int J Non-Linear Mech 42(2):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.02.01510.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2007.02.015 ↗
23. Cuomo M, dell’Isola F, Greco L, Rizzi NL (2017) First versus second gradient energies for planar sheets with two families of inextensible fibres: investigation on deformation boundary layers, discontinuities and geometrical instabilities. Compos Part B Eng 115:423–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.043 ↗
24. Bai R, Guzman-Maldonado E, Zheng R, Colmars J (2024) Influence of in-plane bending behaviour on textile composite reinforcement forming. Int J Mech Sci 273:109206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10920610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109206 ↗
25. McGuinness GB, ÓBrádaigh CM (1998) Characterisation of thermoplastic composite melts in rhombus-shear: the picture-frame experiment. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 29:115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00061-410.1016/S1359-835X(97)00061-4 ↗
26. Barbagallo G, Madeo A, Azehaf I, Giorgio I, Morestin F, Boisse P (2017) Bias extension test on an unbalanced woven composite reinforcement: experiments and modeling via a second-gradient continuum approach. J Compos Mater 51(2):153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831664357710.1177/0021998316643577 ↗
27. Harrison P, Camacho LFG (2021) Deep draw induced wrinkling of engineering fabrics. Int J Solids Struct 212:220–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.12.00310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2020.12.003 ↗
28. Harrison P, Alvarez MF, Anderson D (2018) Towards comprehensive characterisation and modelling of the forming and wrinkling mechanics of engineering fabrics. Int J Solids Struct 154:2–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.11.008 ↗
29. Viisainen J (2022) Wrinkling behaviour of biaxial non-crimp fabrics during preforming. University of Cambridge, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.8105210.17863/CAM.81052 ↗
30. Rueden C, Dietz C, Horn M, Schindelin J, Northan B, Berthold M, Eliceiri K ImageJ Ops [Software], 2016. [Online]. Available: https://imagej.net/Ops
31. Alsayednoor F, Lennard F, Yu WR, Harrison P (2017) Influence of specimen pre-shear and wrinkling on the accuracy of uniaxial bias extension test results. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 101:81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.00610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.006 ↗
32. Kahavitage HNK, Dona (2025) Experimental characterisation and forming analysis of pure unidirectional stitched glass fibre non-crimp fabric (Doctoral dissertation), University of Glasgow, Glasgow. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/id/eprint/85018
33. Harrison P (2016) Modelling the forming mechanics of engineering fabrics using a mutually constrained pantographic beam and membrane mesh. Composite: Part A 81:145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.005 ↗
34. Harrison P, Wiggers J, Long A (2008) Normalisation of shear test data for rate-independent compressible fabrics. J Compos Mater 42:2315–2344. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.272964610.1063/1.2729646 ↗
35. Pourtier J, Duchamp B, Kowalski M, Wang P, Legrand X, Soulat D (2019) Two-way approach for deformation analysis of non-crimp fabrics in uniaxial bias extension tests based on pure and simple shear assumption. Int J Mater Form 12(6):995–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01481-810.1007/s12289-019-01481-8 ↗
36. Kahavita N, Harrison P Protocols.io, 02 July 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.81wgbyy93vpk/v110.17504/protocols.io.81wgbyy93vpk/v1 ↗
37. Harrison P, Taylor E, Alsayednoor J (2018) Improving the accuracy of the uniaxial bias extension test on engineering fabrics using a simple wrinkle mitigation technique. Composites Part A 108:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.025 ↗
38. Willems A, Lomov SV, Verpoest I, Vandepitte D (2008) Optical strain fields in shear and tensile testing of textile reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 68:807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.018 ↗
39. Krogh C, White KD, Sabato A, Sherwood JA (2020) Picture-frame testing of woven prepreg fabric: an investigation of sample geometry and shear angle acquisition. Int J Mater Form 13:341–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01499-y10.1007/s12289-019-01499-y ↗
40. Harrison P, Abdiwi F, Guo Z, Potluri P, Yu W (2012) Characterising the shear–tension coupling and wrinkling behaviour of woven engineering fabrics. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manufac 43:903–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.024 ↗