Effect of manufacturing methods on the performance of rupture disks under various load rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhao G (2015) An easy method to design gas/vapor relief system with rupture disk. J Loss Prev Process Ind 35:321–32810.1016/j.jlp.2015.03.023 ↗
2. Mutegi MK, Schmidt J, Denecke J (2019) Sizing rupture disk vent line systems for high-velocity gas flows. J Loss Prev Process Ind 62:10395010.1016/j.jlp.2019.103950 ↗
3. Shannak B (2010) Experimental and theoretical investigation of gas–liquid flow pressure drop across rupture discs. Nucl Eng Des 240(6):1458–146710.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.02.009 ↗
4. Schmidt J, Claramunt S (2016) Sizing of rupture disks for two-phase gas/liquid flow according to HNE-CSE-model. J Loss Prev Process Ind 41:419–43210.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.016 ↗
5. Zhu H et al (2020) Finite element analysis on the temperature- dependent burst behavior of domed 316L austenitic stainless steel rupture disc. Metals 10(2):23210.3390/met10020232 ↗
6. Bo K et al (2022) Experimental and numerical studies on large-volume hoop-wrapped composite cylinders with steel liner under fire conditions. Thin-Walled Struct 179:10958310.1016/j.tws.2022.109583 ↗
7. Lu C et al (2025) Numerical study on the effects of rupture disk opening manner on high-pressure hydrogen release and spontaneous ignition. Int J Hydrog Energy 139:854–86710.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.332 ↗
8. Kong X et al (2018) Experimental and finite element optimization analysis on hydroforming process of rupture disc. Procedia Manuf 15:892–89810.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.408 ↗
9. Gong L et al (2019) Effect of burst disk parameters on the release of high-pressure hydrogen. Fuel 235:485–49410.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.044 ↗
10. Schrank M (2014) Investigation on the degradation and opening behavior of knife blade burst disks. J Loss Prev Process Ind 32:161–16410.1016/j.jlp.2014.08.011 ↗
11. Jeon GW et al (2022) New test method for real-time measurement of SCC initiation of thin disk specimen in high-temperature primary water environment. Nuclear Eng Technol 54(12):4481–449010.1016/j.net.2022.07.025 ↗
12. Kim TY et al (2024) Parametric study on stress distribution of thin disk specimen of rupture disk corrosion test influencing SCC initiation using finite element analysis. Nucl Eng Technol 56(8):3180–318710.1016/j.net.2024.03.019 ↗
13. Jeong JY et al (2012) A study on the grooving process of a cross-scored rupture disc. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13(2):219–22710.1007/s12541-012-0027-1 ↗
14. Jeong JY et al (2014) Structural analysis on the superficial grooving stainless-steel thin-plate rupture discs. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15(6):1035–104010.1007/s12541-014-0433-7 ↗
15. Cherouat A et al (2008) Experimental and finite element modelling of thin sheet hydroforming processes. IntJ Mater Form 1(1):313–31610.1007/s12289-008-0339-y ↗
16. Javidrad F, Rahmati R (2009) An integrated re-engineering plan for the manufacturing of aerospace components. Materials & Design 30(5):1524–153210.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.055 ↗
17. Gao GF et al (2010) Limit pressure of rupture discs found on tensile instability condition. Adv Mater Res 97–101:296–30010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.296 ↗
18. Liu Z et al (2025) Experimental and numerical investigation of burst characteristics of ultra-high pressure rupture discs. Int J Press Vessels Pip 215:p10545510.1016/j.ijpvp.2025.105455 ↗
19. Yuan D et al (2025) Theoretical design and experimental validation of rupture discs for water heat pipe blackbody source. Measurement 241:11566110.1016/j.measurement.2024.115661 ↗
20. Ragab AR (2008) Prediction of fracture limit curves in sheet metals using a void growth and coalescence model. J Mater Process Technol 199(1):206–21310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.003 ↗
21. Abbasi M et al (2012) Application of the GTN model to predict the forming limit diagram of IF-Steel. J Mech Sci Technol 26(2):345–35210.1007/s12206-011-1038-z ↗
22. Safdarian R (2018) Forming limit diagram prediction of 6061 aluminum by GTN damage model. Mech Ind 19(2):20210.1051/meca/2018006 ↗
23. Yang X, Zhou J, Ling X (2012) Study on plastic damage of AISI 304 stainless steel induced by ultrasonic impact treatment. Materials & Design (1980–2015) 36:477–48110.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.023 ↗
24. Geran Gharakheyli M et al (2017) Investigation of the effective parameters in the bulging process and obtaining forming limit curve of the stainless steel tube by the GTN criterion. Modares Mech Eng 17(6):365–376
25. He M, Li F, Wang Z (2011) Forming limit stress diagram prediction of aluminum alloy 5052 based on GTN model parameters determined by in situ tensile test. Chin J Aeronaut 24(3):378–38610.1016/S1000-9361(11)60045-9 ↗
26. Yang S et al (2012) Effect of geometric factors and processing parameters on plastic damage of SUS304 stainless steel by small punch test. Mater Design 41:447–45210.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.029 ↗
27. Kami A et al (2015) Numerical determination of the forming limit curves of anisotropic sheet metals using GTN damage model. J Mater Process Technol 216:472–48310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.10.017 ↗
28. Khodadadi M, Khalili K, Ashrafi A (2020) Studying the effective parameters on teeth height in internal gear flowforming process. Int J Eng 33(12):2563–2571
29. Khodadadi M, Khalili K, Ashrafi A (2022) Optimizing parameters effective on built-up edge in internal gear flowforming process. Sadhana 47(2):9910.1007/s12046-022-01860-z ↗
30. Esmailian M, Khodadadi M (2023) Finite element simulation of double-nosing process for manufacturing of the special engine shell. Arab J Sci Eng 48(9):11927–1194010.1007/s13369-023-07620-3 ↗
31. Wong CC, Dean TA, Lin J (2004) Incremental forming of solid cylindrical components using flow forming principles. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:60–6610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.102 ↗
32. Önder E, Tekkaya AE (2008) Numerical simulation of various cross sectional workpieces using conventional deep drawing and hydroforming technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(5):532–54210.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.06.012 ↗
33. Desu RK, Singh SK, Gupta AK (2016) Comparative study of warm and hydromechanical deep drawing for low-carbon steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1):661–67210.1007/s00170-015-7819-2 ↗