journal article·2026-06Open access

Hybrid tools for tube bending processes using additive manufacturing and digital twin

Muhammad Ali Kaleem, Peter Frohn-Sörensen, Rainer Steinheimer, Bernd Engel

Abstract

Abstract Forming tools are conventionally made from alloy steels with high material stiffness (Elastic Modulus). In comparison to alloy steels, polymeric materials are light weight and inexpensive. 3D printed polymeric tools are therefore suitable for manufacturing setups oriented towards customized productions. However, relatively low material stiffness limits the use of polymeric tools in production regime. This paper presents a novel concept of developing hybrid tools which consists of highly stiff metallic surfaces and 3D printed polymeric base. The hybrid tools are designed according to process parameters, tool material properties and contact pressure pattern at the tool’s mating surfaces. The contact surfaces of a hybrid tool behave like actuators which respond according to pre-computed applied loads. As test case, a hybrid forming tool (hybrid pressure die) is designed, developed and tested in a cold form tube bending process. FE-simulations are conducted with the digital twin of the tube bending process. The accuracy of digital twin is validated by conducting practical experiments. A comparison is made between hybrid pressure die and its erstwhile conventional counterpart (metal pressure die). Performance comparison is based on von Mises stresses, major strains, contact forces, failure risk, elastic deformations and surface displacements of the tools. Cost comparison is made on the basis of Ashby cost performance index. For the first time, a concept of in-process adjustment of tool surfaces in response to increasing tube diameter is presented. This research demonstrates that hybrid tools are cost effective and light weight alternative to conventional metallic tools used in production processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Klocke F, Kuchle A (2009) Manufacturing processes, vol Vol. 2. Springer, Berlin, p 433
2. Lange K, Cser L, Geiger M, Kals JAG (1992) Tool life and tool quality in bulk metal forming. CIRP Ann 41(2):667–67510.1016/S0007-8506(07)63253-3 ↗
3. Brecher C, Esser M, Witt S (2009) Interaction of manufacturing process and machine tool. CIRP Ann 58(2):588–60710.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.005 ↗
4. Ráž K, Čechura M (2019), November Optimization of forming machine stiffness for increased production accuracy. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 651, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing10.1088/1757-899X/651/1/012015 ↗
5. Hesse D, Hoppe F, Groche P (2017) Controlling product stiffness by an incremental sheet metal forming process. Procedia Manuf 10:276–28510.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.058 ↗
6. Tooling and die wear, AHSS Guidelines. https://ahssinsights.org/forming/tooling/tooling-and-die-wear. Accessed 01.06.2025
7. Recknagel - EDM Block Special size, 1.2379 x 153 CrMoV12, https://-Halbzeug-Individual-Eroblock-Sonder-1.2379. https://en.stahlnetz.de/a/307. Accessed 01.06.2025
8. Sun C, Pan F, Bin H, Zhang J, Xue L, Qiu B, Li Y (2018) A low cost and high performance polymer donor material for polymer solar cells. Nat Commun 9(1):74310.1038/s41467-018-03207-x ↗
9. Frank FC (1970) The strength and stiffness of polymers. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 319(1536):127–136
10. Tondini F, Basso A, Arinbjarnar U, Nielsen CV (2021) The performance of 3d printed polymer tools in sheet metal forming. Metals 11(8):125610.3390/met11081256 ↗
11. Kampker A, Triebs J, Kawollek S, Ayvaz P, Beyer T (2019) Direct polymer additive tooling–effect of additive manufactured polymer tools on part material properties for injection moulding. Rapid Prototyp J 25(10):1575–158410.1108/RPJ-07-2018-0161 ↗
12. Cho SK, Kim HJ, Chang SH (2011) The application of polymer composites to the table-top machine tool components for higher stiffness and reduced weight. Compos Struct 93(2):492–50110.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.030 ↗
13. Frohn-Sörensen P, Geueke M, Engel B, Löffler B, Bickendorf P, Asimi A, Schuh G (2022) Design for 3D printed tools: mechanical material properties for direct polymer additive tooling. Polymers 14(9):169410.3390/polym14091694 ↗
14. Kaleem MA, Steinheimer R, Frohn-Sörensen P, Kotzian T, Engel B (2024) Topology optimization of forming tools: pressure die in rotary draw bending process. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01932-w10.1007/s12008-024-01932-w ↗
15. Ashby MF, Bréchet YJ (2003) Designing hybrid materials. Acta Mater 51(19):5801–582110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00441-5 ↗
16. Trzepieciński T, Najm SM, Sbayti M, Belhadjsalah H, Szpunar M, Lemu HG (2021) New advances and future possibilities in forming technology of hybrid metal–polymer composites used in aerospace applications. J Compos Sci 5(8):21710.3390/jcs5080217 ↗
17. Ramya A, Vanapalli SL (2016) 3D printing technologies in various applications. Int J Mech Eng Technol 7(3):396–409
18. Rowlands DP (2006) The Mechanical Properties of Stainless Steel. BSC Eng (Witwatersrand), MIM, Ceng. Stainless Steel Information Series, (3)
19. Chen J, Young B (2006) Stress–strain curves for stainless steel at elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 28(2):229–23910.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.005 ↗
20. Seyyedhatami SM, Lexian H (2020) Analysis of the rotary-draw bending process for thin-walled rectangular aluminum tube. Iran J Mater Form 7(1):70–83
21. Kaleem MA, Frohn-Sörensen P, Nebeling D, Engel B (2023), September Refinement of Process Parameters in Rotary Draw Bending Processes. In International Conference on the Technology of Plasticity (pp. 359–370). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland10.1007/978-3-031-42093-1_35 ↗
22. Kaleem MA, Frohn-Sörensen P, Geueke M, Engel B (2023) The way forward in rotary draw bending: a review
23. Safdarian R, Kord A (2019) Experimental investigation of effective parameters in the tube rotary draw bending process. Mater Res Express 6(6):06653110.1088/2053-1591/ab0c36 ↗
24. Li H, Yang H, Zhan M, Kou YL (2010) Deformation behaviors of thin-walled tube in rotary draw bending under push assistant loading conditions. J Mater Process Technol 210(1):143–15810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.07.024 ↗
25. Heftrich C, Steinheimer R, Engel B (2018) Rotary-draw-bending using tools with reduced geometries. Procedia Manuf 15:804–81110.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.410 ↗
26. Shercliff HR, Lovatt AM (2001) Selection of manufacturing processes in design and the role of process modelling. Prog Mater Sci 46(3–4):429–45910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00013-X ↗
27. Liu H, Liu Y, Zhang P, Du X (2020) Effect of weld zone and corner with cold bending effect on wrinkling of rectangular welded tube in rotary draw bending. Thin-Walled Struct 157:10711510.1016/j.tws.2020.107115 ↗
28. Kaleem MA, Steinheimer R, Frohn-Sörensen P et al (2024) Additive manufacturing of polymeric pressure die for rotary draw bending process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 134:1789–1804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14221-310.1007/s00170-024-14221-3 ↗
29. Ashby MF, Johnson K (2013) Materials and design: the art and science of material selection in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann10.1016/B978-0-08-098205-2.00007-X ↗
30. Ashby MF (1997) Material property charts. Materials Selection and Design. ASM international, pp 266–28010.31399/asm.hb.v20.a0002452 ↗
31. Ashby MF (1993) Criteria for selecting the components of composites. Acta Metall Mater 41(5):1313–133510.1016/0956-7151(93)90242-K ↗
32. Ashby MF (1991) Overview 92: materials and shape. Acta Metall Mater 39(6):1025–103910.1016/0956-7151(91)90189-8 ↗
33. Huber JE, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (1997) The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 453(1965):2185–220510.1098/rspa.1997.0117 ↗
34. Cebon¹ D, Ashby MF (1992) Materials selection for mechanical design. Computerization and Networking of Materials Databases: Third Volume 1140:323
35. Ashby MF, Jones DR (2012) Engineering materials 1: an introduction to properties, applications and design, vol 1. Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-08-096665-6.00001-5 ↗
36. Liu K, Liu Y, Yang H (2014) Experimental and FE simulation study on cross-section distortion of rectangular tube under multi-die constraints in rotary draw bending process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:633–64110.1007/s12541-014-0381-2 ↗
37. Strano M (2005) Automatic tooling design for rotary draw bending of tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:733–74010.1007/s00170-003-2055-6 ↗
38. Yang W (1980) A generalized von Mises criterion for yield and fracture10.1115/1.3153658 ↗
39. Mari D, Gonseth DR (1993) A new look at carbide tool life. Wear 165(1):9–1710.1016/0043-1648(93)90366-T ↗
40. Cunha A, Yanik Y, Olivieri C, da Silva S (2023) Tresca vs. von Mises: Which failure criterion is more conservative in a probabilistic context? J Appl Mech, 1–810.31224/3923 ↗
41. Zhou C, Guo H, Li J, Huang S, Li H, Meng Y, Jiang S (2016) Temperature dependence of poly (lactic acid) mechanical properties. RSC Adv 6(114):113762–11377210.1039/C6RA23610C ↗
42. Lyu MY, Choi TG (2015) Research trends in polymer materials for use in lightweight vehicles. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 16:213–22010.1007/s12541-015-0029-x ↗
43. Esawi AMK, Ashby MF (2003) Cost estimates to guide pre-selection of processes. Mater Des 24(8):605–61610.1016/S0261-3069(03)00136-5 ↗
44. Shah DU (2014) Natural fibre composites: comprehensive Ashby-type materials selection charts. Materials & Design (1980–2015) 62:21–3110.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.002 ↗
45. Ashby M, Cope E, Cebon D (2013) Materials selection for engineering design. Informatics for materials science and engineering. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp 219–24410.1016/B978-0-12-394399-6.00010-2 ↗
46. Ezeh OH, Susmel L (2018) On the fatigue strength of 3D-printed polylactide (PLA). Procedia Struct Integr 9:29–3610.1016/j.prostr.2018.06.007 ↗
47. Algarni M (2022) Fatigue behavior of PLA material and the effects of mean stress and notch: experiments and modeling. Procedia Struct Integr 37:676–68310.1016/j.prostr.2022.01.137 ↗
48. Kaleem MA, Frohn-Sörensen P, Steinheimer R, Engel B (2025) Design criteria to use 3D printed polymeric tools in metal forming processes. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 408, p. 01008). EDP Sciences10.1051/matecconf/202540801008 ↗
49. Blum W, Eisenlohr PAND, Breutinger F (2002) Understanding creep—a review. Metall Mater Trans A 33(2):291–30310.1007/s11661-002-0090-9 ↗
50. Afrose MF (2016) Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of polylactic acid (PLA) materials processed through fused deposition modelling (FDM) (Doctoral dissertation, Swinburne)