Study on mechanical hammer forming and surface layer properties of 7075 aluminum alloy thin-walled parts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang X, Zhang DY, Li A et al (2024) A review on traditional processes and laser powder bed fusion of aluminum alloy microstructures, mechanical properties, costs, and applications. Materials 17(11):2553. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1711255310.3390/ma17112553 ↗
2. Chen ZH, Lu J, Liu HB et al (2016) Experimental investigation on the post-fire mechanical properties of structural aluminum alloys 6061-T6 and 7075-T73. Thin-Walled Struct 106:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.05.00510.1016/j.tws.2016.05.005 ↗
3. Rashidov BP, Abdullaev BA, Rakhimov RV (2023) Corrosion of aluminum and aluminum alloys used for rolling stock. Met Sci Heat Treat 65:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11041-023-00910-510.1007/s11041-023-00910-5 ↗
4. Kulkarni AR, Reddy AP, Dewangan S (2024) Investigation into the Performance of TIG and MIG Welded Joints of Al6061 Plates. International Conference on Futuristic Advancements in Materials, Manufacturing and Thermal Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4324-7_1210.1007/978-981-97-4324-7_12 ↗
5. Zhang H, Wei W, Long S et al (2025) Optimization of stamping process parameters for sustainable manufacturing: numerical simulation based on autoform. Sustainability 17(1):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1701034110.3390/su17010341 ↗
6. Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R (2010) Design of complex sheet metal forming processes: a new computer aided progressive approach. IntJ Mater Form 3:21–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-010-0697-010.1007/s12289-010-0697-0 ↗
7. Calabrese M, Del Prete A, Primo T (2025) Sheet metal forming processes: development of an innovative methodology for the integration of the metal forming and structural analysis. IntJ Mater Form. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-024-01868-2. 18,1310.1007/s12289-024-01868-2 ↗
8. Dada M, Popoola P (2024) Recent advances in joining technologies of aluminum alloys: a review. Discover Mater 4(1):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-024-00155-w10.1007/s43939-024-00155-w ↗
9. Chen ML, Yang XF, Zhang ZQ et al (2025) Research status of laser cladding technology on aluminum alloy surface. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 137(1–2):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-025-15204-810.1007/s00170-025-15204-8 ↗
10. Hu ZQ, Wang CG, Chen X et al (2016) A novel forming method for three-dimensional thin sheet metal. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 230(9):1751–1755. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541558490010.1177/0954405415584900 ↗
11. Yan L, Qi C (2025) Optimization design of stamping die for large-size three-dimensional curved thick plate. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 239(7):2290–2305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406224130486910.1177/09544062241304869 ↗
12. Ingarao G, Di Lorenzo R (2010) Optimization methods for complex sheet metal stamping computer aided engineering. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(3):459–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0519-510.1007/s00158-010-0519-5 ↗
13. Sushitskii V, Dubois PO, Miao HY et al (2024) Simulation and automation of aluminum panel shot peen forming. IntJ Mater Form 17(3):21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-024-01826-y10.1007/s12289-024-01826-y ↗
14. Xiao XD, Sun Y, Tong X et al (2019) Prediction of peen forming stress and plate deformation with a combined method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B-Journal of Engineering Manufacture 233(14):2492–2504. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541984054910.1177/0954405419840549 ↗
15. Zhang MZ, Liu CG, Gao B et al (2024) A combined DEM-FEM method for simulating the actual peen forming process to estimate forming effectiveness. J Manuf Process 109:115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.00310.1016/j.jmapro.2023.12.003 ↗
16. Zhang QL, Li H, Zhai MG et al (2021) Numerical and experimental study on the deformation of aluminum alloy ring treated by ultrasonic shot peen forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 113(9–10):2791–2804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06786-010.1007/s00170-021-06786-0 ↗
17. Lu XL, Qian F, Sun ZJ et al (2022) Ultrasonic peening for dieless metal deformation in vacuum conditions. Sens Actuators a-Physical 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.11362810.1016/j.sna.2022.113628 ↗
18. Jiang GQ, Zhou JZ, Wu J et al (2024) Parameter optimization for laser Peen forming on 6005A-T6 aluminum alloy plates to enhance the constrained deformation of integral stiffened plates. Materials 17(20):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1720509010.3390/ma17205090 ↗
19. Yocom CJ, Zhang X, Liao YL (2018) Research and development status of laser peen forming: a review. Opt Laser Technol 108:32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.06.03210.1016/j.optlastec.2018.06.032 ↗
20. Schulze V, Bleicher F, Groche P et al (2016) Surface modification by machine hammer peening and burnishing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 65(2):809–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.00510.1016/j.cirp.2016.05.005 ↗
21. Klocke F, Trauth D, Schongen F et al (2014) Analysis of friction between stainless steel sheets and machine hammer peened structured tool surfaces: experimental and numerical investigation of the lubricated interaction gap. Prod Eng Res Devel 8(3):263–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-013-0519-610.1007/s11740-013-0519-6 ↗
22. Franziska, Lienert M et al (2016) Experimental study on comparing intensities of burnishing and machine hammer peening processes. Procedia CIRP 45:371–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.14310.1016/j.procir.2016.02.143 ↗
23. Steitz M, Stein P, Groche P (2015) Influence of hammer-peened surface textures on friction behavior. Tribol Lett 58(2):8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-015-0502-910.1007/s11249-015-0502-9 ↗
24. Liu Y, Wang YF, Yu L et al (2024) Investigation of the microhardness, morphology, and wear resistance of A7075 subjected to machine hammer peening. Coatings 14(12):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1412148110.3390/coatings14121481 ↗
25. Lan LY, Niu HB, Cui YA et al (2023) Local shape adjustment and residual stresses of integrally stiffened panel induced by mechanical hammer peening. J Manuf Process 91:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.04410.1016/j.jmapro.2023.02.044 ↗
26. Madariaga A, Cuesta M, Ortiz-De-Zarate G et al (2024) Correcting distortions of thin-walled machined parts by machine hammer peening. Chin J Aeronaut 37(6):439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.10.02310.1016/j.cja.2023.10.023 ↗
27. Franchim AS, de Campos VS, Travessa DN et al (2009) Analytical modelling for residual stresses produced by shot peening. Mater Des 30(5):1556–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.04010.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.040 ↗
28. Fan F, Xu TL, Zhi XD et al (2022) Research on dynamic constitutive model and fracture criterion of 6082-T6 aluminium alloy. Structures 38:14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.07110.1016/j.istruc.2022.01.071 ↗
29. Sheng XF, Xia QX, Cheng XQ et al (2012) Residual stress field induced by shot peening based on random-shots for 7075 aluminum alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:S261–S. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-6326(12)61717-810.1016/s1003-6326(12)61717-8 ↗
30. Madariaga A, Perez I, Arrazola PJ et al (2018) Reduction of distortions in large aluminium parts by controlling machining-induced residual stresses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1965-210.1007/s00170-018-1965-2 ↗