journal article·2025-06

The plastic flow analysis of cold strained DC04 ferritic steel using BBC family yield functions under associated flow rule and non-associated flow rule concepts

Naoel Brinis, Oualid Chahaoui, Abdenour Saoudi, Salim Boulahrouz, Nedjoua Matougui

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Chahaoui O, Fares ML, Piot D, Montheillet F (2013) Mechanical modeling of macroscopic behaviour for anisotropic and heterogeneous metal alloys. Met Mater Int 19:1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-013-5013-310.1007/s12540-013-5013-3 ↗
2. Chahaoui O, Matougui N, Boulahrouz S et al (2021) An Associated and Nonassociated Flow Rule Comparison for AISI 439–430TI Forming: Modeling and Experimental Analysis. Lat Am J Solids Struct 18:e406. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-7825672410.1590/1679-78256724 ↗
3. Chahaoui O, Fares ML, Piot D, Montheillet F (2011) Monoclinic effects and orthotropic estimation for the behaviour of rolled sheet. J Mater Sci 46:1655–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-4983-510.1007/s10853-010-4983-5 ↗
4. Motaman SAH, Haase C (2021) The microstructural effects on the mechanical response of polycrystals: A comparative experimental-numerical study on conventionally and additively manufactured metallic materials. Int J Plast 140:102941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2021.10294110.1016/j.ijplas.2021.102941 ↗
5. Regaiguia B, Chahaoui O, Saoudi A et al (2022) An Evolutionary Anisotropic Behavior for DC04 Sheet Using Hill48 Function under Non-Associated Flow Rule Hypothesis. J Nano- Electron Phys 14:05009–1. https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.14(5).0500910.21272/jnep.14(5).05009 ↗
6. Mises RV (1913) Mechanik der festen Körper im plastisch- deformablen Zustand. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse 1913:582–592
7. Hill R (1948) A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A 193:281–297. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.004510.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
8. Hosford WF (1972) A Generalized Isotropic Yield Criterion. J Appl Mech 39:607–609. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.342273210.1115/1.3422732 ↗
9. Hosford WF (1996) On the crystallographic basis of yield criteria. Textures and Microstructures 26–27:479–49310.1155/TSM.26-27.479 ↗
10. Karafillis AP, Boyce MC (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 41(12):1859–8610.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-O ↗
11. Barlat F, Lian J (1989) Plastic behavior and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheets under plane stress conditions. Int J Plast 5:51–6610.1016/0749-6419(89)90019-3 ↗
12. Barlat F, Lege DJ, Brem JC (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7:693–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z10.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
13. Barlat F, Maeda Y, Chung K et al (1997) Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheets. J Mech Phys Solids 45:1727–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-310.1016/S0022-5096(97)00034-3 ↗
14. Barlat F, Becker RC, Hayashida Y et al (1997) Yielding description for solution strengthened aluminum alloys. Int J Plast 13:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-810.1016/S0749-6419(97)80005-8 ↗
15. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW et al (2003) Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—part 1: theory. Int J Plast 19:1297–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
16. Banabic D, Kuwabara T, Balan T et al (2003) Non-quadratic yield criterion for orthotropic sheet metals under plane-stress conditions. Int J Mech Sci 45:797–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00139-510.1016/S0020-7403(03)00139-5 ↗
17. Banabic D, Aretz H, Paraianu L, Jurco P (2005) Application of various FLD modelling approaches. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng 13:759–769. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/13/5/00910.1088/0965-0393/13/5/009 ↗
18. Comsa D-S, Banabic D (2008) Plane-Stress Yield Criterion for Highly-Anisotropic Sheet Metals
19. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon JW et al (2005) Linear transfomation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21:1009–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
20. Hu Q, Yoon JW, Stoughton TB (2021) Analytical determination of anisotropic parameters for Poly6 yield function. Int J Mech Sci 201:106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10646710.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106467 ↗
21. Aretz H, Barlat F (2013) New convex yield functions for orthotropic metal plasticity. Int J Non-Linear Mech 51:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.00710.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2012.12.007 ↗
22. Yoshida F, Hamasaki H, Uemori T (2013) A user-friendly 3D yield function to describe anisotropy of steel sheets. Int J Plast 45:119–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.010 ↗
23. Hu Q, Yoon JW, Manopulo N, Hora P (2021) A coupled yield criterion for anisotropic hardening with analytical description under associated flow rule: Modeling and validation. Int J Plast 136:102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10288210.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102882 ↗
24. Cazacu O (2018) New yield criteria for isotropic and textured metallic materials. Int J Solids Struct 139–140:200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.03610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2018.01.036 ↗
25. Yoon JW, Lou Y, Yoon J, Glazoff MV (2014) Asymmetric yield function based on the stress invariants for pressure sensitive metals. Int J Plast 56:184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2013.11.008 ↗
26. Hu Q, Li X, Han X et al (2017) A normalised stress invariant-based yield criterion: Modeling and validation. Int J Plast 99:248–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.010 ↗
27. Lou Y, Zhang S, Yoon JW (2020) Strength modeling of sheet metals from shear to plane strain tension. Int J Plast 134:102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10281310.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102813 ↗
28. Yang H, Zhang W, Zhuang X, Zhao Z (2023) Anisotropic plastic flow of low/medium carbon steel plates in different loading conditions: Characterization of the r-value. J Mater Process Technol 321:118159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.11815910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118159 ↗
29. Stoughton TB (2002) A non-associated flow rule for sheet metal forming. Int J Plast 18:687–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00053-510.1016/S0749-6419(01)00053-5 ↗
30. Stoughton TB, Yoon J-W (2004) A pressure-sensitive yield criterion under a non-associated flow rule for sheet metal forming. Int J Plast 20:705–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00079-210.1016/S0749-6419(03)00079-2 ↗
31. Stoughton TB, Yoon JW (2006) Review of Drucker’s postulate and the issue of plastic stability in metal forming. Int J Plast 22:391–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.00210.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.002 ↗
32. Cvitanić V, Vlak F, Lozina Ž (2008) A finite element formulation based on non-associated plasticity for sheet metal forming. Int J Plast 24:646–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.00310.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.003 ↗
33. Safaei M, Yoon JW, De Waele W (2014) Study on the definition of equivalent plastic strain under non-associated flow rule for finite element formulation. Int J Plast 58:219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.09.01010.1016/j.ijplas.2013.09.010 ↗
34. Hu Q, Li X, Chen J (2018) On the calculation of plastic strain by simple method under non-associated flow rule. Eur J Mech A Solids 67:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.08.01710.1016/j.euromechsol.2017.08.017 ↗
35. Hou Y, Min J, Stoughton TB et al (2020) A non-quadratic pressure-sensitive constitutive model under non-associated flow rule with anisotropic hardening: Modeling and validation. Int J Plast 135:102808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.10280810.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102808 ↗
36. Barlat F, Yoon S-Y (2023) Anisotropic Plasticity During Non-proportional Loading. In: Altenbach H, Ganczarski A (eds) Advanced Theories for Deformation, Damage and Failure in Materials. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 63–11910.1007/978-3-031-04354-3_2 ↗
37. Langford WF, Snyder SC, Bausch J (1950) New criteria for predicting the press performance of deep drawing steels. Trans, Amer Soc Metals 42:1197–1232
38. He Z, Zhang K, Zhu H et al (2022) An anisotropic constitutive model for forming of aluminum tubes under both biaxial tension and pure shear stress states. Int J Plast 152:103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.10325910.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103259 ↗
39. Tabor D (1948) A Simple Theory of Static and Dynamic Hardness. Proc R Soc Lond A 192:247–27410.1098/rspa.1948.0008 ↗
40. Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Oxford University Press, Great Britain
41. Sanders PG, Youngdahl CJ, Weertman JR (1997) The strength of nanocrystalline metals with and without flaws. Mater Sci Eng A 234–236:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00185-810.1016/S0921-5093(97)00185-8 ↗
42. Cheng Y-T, Cheng C-M (2004) Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 44:91–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
43. Zhang P, Li SX, Zhang ZF (2011) General relationship between strength and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 529:62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.06110.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061 ↗
44. Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–16810.1090/qam/10666 ↗
45. Marquardt DW (1963) An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11:196310.1137/0111030 ↗
46. Hockett JE, Sherby OD (1975) Large strain ~efurmatiun of polycrystalline metals at low homologous temperatures. J Mech Phys Solids 23(2):87–9810.1016/0022-5096(75)90018-6 ↗
47. Ohashi K, Utsunomiya H, Matsumoto R (2011) Evaluation of r-value of steels using Vickers hardness test. Journal of Physics10.1088/1742-6596/379/1/012045 ↗