Investigation on the effect of pressure rate on the thickness, microstructure and property of magnesium alloy cylindrical part during warm hydromechanical deep drawing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang W, Xu J (2022) Advanced lightweight materials for automobiles: a review. Mater Des 221:110994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11099410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110994 ↗
2. Du B, Li QC, Zheng CQ, Wang SZ, Gao C, Chen LL (2023) Application of lightweight structure in automobile bumper beam: a review. Materials 16:967. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1603096710.3390/ma16030967 ↗
3. Der A, Kaluza A, Reimer L, Herrmann C, Thieds S (2022) Integration of energy oriented manufacturing simulation into the life cycle evaluation of lightweight body parts. Int J Pr Eng Man-Gt 9:899–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00412-w10.1007/s40684-021-00412-w ↗
4. Yang Y, Xiong XM, Chen J, Peng XD, Chen DL, Pan FS (2021) Research advances in magnesium and magnesium alloys worldwide in 2020. J Magnes Alloy 9:705–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.04.00110.1016/j.jma.2021.04.001 ↗
5. Prasad SVS, Prasad SB, Verma K, Mishra RK, Kumar V, Singh S (2022) The role and significance of magnesium in modern day research-a review. J Magnes Alloy 10:1–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.01210.1016/j.jma.2021.05.012 ↗
6. Nazeer F, Long JY, Yang Z, Li C (2022) Super plastic deformation behavior of Mg alloys: a-review. J Magnes Alloy 10:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/760614010.1155/2018/7606140 ↗
7. Lee J, Bong HJ, Lee YS, Kim DM, Lee G (2019) Pulsed electric current v-bending spring back of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheets. Mater Trans 50:2720–2731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-019-05213-010.1007/s11661-019-05213-0 ↗
8. Zou FL, Huang SY, Lei Y, Zhang JF, Zhou MC, Yan SW, Feng F (2018) Forming limit diagrams of AZ31 Mg sheet at elevated temperatures and high strain rates by electromagnetic hybrid forming. Int J Appl Electrom 26:2426–2432. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAE-18002810.3233/JAE-180028 ↗
9. Cai GS, Yang JL, Yuan YF, Yang XY, Lang LH, Alexandrov S (2020) Mechanics analysis of aluminum alloy cylindrical cup during warm sheet hydromechanical deep drawing. Int J Mech Sci 174:105556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10555610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105556 ↗
10. Ballikaya H, Savas V, Ozay C (2020) The limit drawing ratio in die angled hydromechanical deep drawing method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 106:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04624-y10.1007/s00170-019-04624-y ↗
11. Kimura S, Furushima T (2023) New small-scale hydromechanical deep-drawing process using die-integrated active high-pressure generation system. Int J Mater Form 16:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01773-010.1007/s12289-023-01773-0 ↗
12. Halkaci M, Dilmec M, Turkoz M, Elmali A, Avci S, Daghan B, Halkaci HS (2020) Determination of die and process parameters of hydromechanical deep drawing using analogy method. J Phys Conf Ser 35:2161–2182. https://doi.org/10.17341/gazimmfd.55779610.17341/gazimmfd.557796 ↗
13. Turkoz M, Halkaci HS (2020) An investigation of the effect of temperature variability of the tools on FEA of the warm hydromechanical deep drawing process. SN Applied Sciences 2:1939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03771-210.1007/s42452-020-03771-2 ↗
14. Abbadeni M, Zidane I, Zahloul H, Madaoul Z (2019) Comparative study of conventional and hydromechanical deep drawing processes based on finite element analysis. Frat ed Integrita Strutt 49:282–290. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.2810.3221/IGF-ESIS.49.28 ↗
15. Mousa AAA, Khlef AA, Jweeg MJ (2022) Numerical and experimental studies of the formability of the low carbon steel (11008-AISI) by using hydromechanical deep drawing. Mater Today 60:1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.30510.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.305 ↗
16. Turkoz M, Cora ON, Gedikil H, Dilmec M, Halkaci HS, Koc M (2020) Numerical optimization of warm hydromechanical deep drawing process parameters and its experimental verification. J Manuf Process 57:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.02010.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.020 ↗
17. Fereshteh-Saniee F, Yaghoubi S (2023) Textural and microstructural analyses and ranking of the process parameters in hydro-mechanical deep drawing of AZ31B magnesium sheets. J Mater Res Technol 24:9261–9272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.12610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.05.126 ↗
18. Zhang J, Wang RC, Zeng Y (2022) Hydroforming rules and quality control parameters analysis for metal bipolar plate. Eng Fail Anal 132:105919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10591910.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105919 ↗
19. Afsoon A, Hassan MN, Hamed DA, Hossein TG, Hassan B, Ali ZB (2024) Hydro-mechanical deep drawing of conical components: Wrinkling behavior and process enhancement. J Eng Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.04.00510.1016/j.jer.2024.04.005 ↗
20. Yaghoubi S, Fereshteh-Saniee F (2022) A comprehensive study on soundness, microstructure, and uniformity of 2024 aluminum cups hydro-mechanically drawn at elevated temperatures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120:7905–7917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09185-110.1007/s00170-022-09185-1 ↗
21. Cai GS, Wu CY, Gao ZP, Lang LH, Alexandrov S (2018) Investigation on the effect of pressure rate on formability of aluminum alloy during warm/hot sheet hydroforming. Aip Adv 8:095313. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.505022210.1063/1.5050222 ↗
22. Ghasemi R, Elyasi M, Baseri H, Mirnia MJ (2023) Microstructural analysis of sheet hydroforming process assisted by radial ultrasonic punch vibration in a hydro-mechanical deep drawing die. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 125:5359–5368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11007-x10.1007/s00170-023-11007-x ↗
23. Yaghoubi S, Fereshteh-Saniee F (2023) Effects of process variables on the uniformity of Al-St and Al-Mg laminated composite cups produced by hydro-mechanical deep drawing operation. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 237:424–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405422110223910.1177/09544054221102239 ↗
24. Liu BS, Lang LH, Zeng YS, Lin JG (2012) Forming characteristic of sheet hydroforming under the influence of through-thickness normal stress. J Mater Process Tech 212:1875–1884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.021 ↗
25. Pan YF, Cai GS (2023) Optimization of processing parameters of aluminum alloy cylindrical parts based on response surface method during hydromechanical deep drawing. Metals 13:1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1308140610.3390/met13081406 ↗
26. Wang W, Huang L, Tao KH, Chen SC, Wei XC (2015) Formability and numerical simulation of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet in warm stamping process. Mater Des 87:835–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.09810.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.098 ↗
27. Jin WH, Wu BL, Zhang L, Esling C, Philippe MJ (2024) Investigating formability of AZ31B magnesium alloy sheet with different texture and thickness in combination of the Erichsen experiment and CPFEM model. J Mater Res Technol-JMRT 33:4493–4509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.13710.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.137 ↗
28. Wang RJ, Zhou Q, Huang Y, Su H, Ma LD, Zhang PC (2024) Influence of plastic zone ratios on microstructural changes in AZ31B magnesium alloy plates after straightening. J Alloy Compd 981:173649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.17364910.1016/j.jallcom.2024.173649 ↗