Combined rotary draw tube bending and hydroforming: thickness recovery and defect optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Ha S, Cho D, Park J, Kim S (2022) A study on the design of bending process according to the shape of initial billets for Bi-metal elbow. Metals 12(9):1474. https://doi.org/10.3390/met1209147410.3390/met12091474 ↗
2. Kaleem MA, Frohn-Sörensen P, Geueke M, Engel B (2023) The way forward in rotary draw bending: a review. https://doi.org/10.25819/ubsi/1039410.25819/ubsi/10394 ↗
3. Engel B, Al-Maeeni SSH (2020) Re-engineering of rotary draw bending machines: a survey of manufacturers and users. Int J Precis Eng Manuf - Green Technol 7:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00115-310.1007/s40684-019-00115-3 ↗
4. Ghiotti A, Simonetto E, Bruschi S (2021) Insights on tube rotary draw bending with superimposed localized thermal field. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 33:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.02.01210.1016/j.cirpj.2021.02.012 ↗
5. Borchmann L, Heftrich C, Knoche J, Schiller M (2023) Control of material flow using measuring methods for wrinkle and crack detection during rotary draw bending. Procedia CIRP 118:857–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.14710.1016/j.procir.2023.06.147 ↗
6. Tronvoll SA, Ma J, Welo T (2023) Deformation behavior in tube bending: a comparative study of compression bending and rotary draw bending. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 124(3):801–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-10433-710.1007/s00170-022-10433-7 ↗
7. Elyasi M, Khatir FA, Ghadikolaee HT, Modanloo V (2024) Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of the effect of type of bending die on the quality of tube forming in rotary draw bending process. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf 7(2):233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.10.00510.1016/j.ijlmm.2023.10.005 ↗
8. Safdarian R, Kord A (2019) Experimental investigation of effective parameters in the tube rotary draw bending process. Mater Res Express 6(6):066531. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0c3610.1088/2053-1591/ab0c36 ↗
9. Ruan S, Lang L, Ge Y (2018) Hydroforming process for an ultrasmall bending radius elbow, Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/763470810.1155/2018/7634708 ↗
10. Simonetto E, Ghiotti A, Bruschi S (2021) In-process measurement of springback in tube rotary draw bending. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 112:2485–2496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06453-w10.1007/s00170-020-06453-w ↗
11. Ha T, Welo T, Ringen G, Wang J (2021) A strategy for on-machine springback measurement in rotary draw bending using digital image-based laser tracking. Int J Adv Manuf Technol: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08178-w10.1007/s00170-021-08178-w ↗
12. Safdarian R (2020) Investigation of tube fracture in the rotary draw bending process using experimental and numerical methods. Int J Mater Form 13(4):493–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-019-01484-510.1007/s12289-019-01484-5 ↗
13. Yang Y-J, Lee C-M (2021) A study on the optimization of joint mandrel shape for manufacturing long type elbow using push bending process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 22:431–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-020-00443-410.1007/s12541-020-00443-4 ↗
14. Borchmann L, Heftrich C, Engel B (2020) Influence of the stiffness of machine axes on the formation of wrinkles during rotary draw bending. SN Appl Sci 2:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03419-110.1007/s42452-020-03419-1 ↗
15. Chinchanikar S, Mulik H, Varude P, Atole S, Mundada N (2024) A review of emerging hydroforming technologies: design considerations, parametric studies, and recent innovations. J Eng Appl Sci 71(1):205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-024-00546-z10.1186/s44147-024-00546-z ↗
16. Marlapalle BG, Hingole RS (2023) Numerical and experimental predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process. Aust J Mech Eng 21(3):991–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/14484846.2021.193895210.1080/14484846.2021.1938952 ↗
17. Meng Z, Liu J, Wang B (2023) Forming performance of multi-way tubes in hydroforming. J Phys Conf Ser. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2587/1/012011. IOP Publishing10.1088/1742-6596/2587/1/012011 ↗
18. Marlapalle BG, Hingole RS (2021) Predictions of formability parameters in tube hydroforming process. SN Appl Sci 3(6):606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04533-410.1007/s42452-021-04533-4 ↗
19. Cui X-L, Wang X-S, Yuan S (2019) Effects of mechanical property parameters on wrinkling behavior of thin-walled tubes in hydroforming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:729–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2706-210.1007/s00170-018-2706-2 ↗
20. Colpani A, Fiorentino A, Ceretti E (2020) Characterization and optimization of the hydroforming process of AISI 316L steel hydraulic tubes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 107:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05067-610.1007/s00170-020-05067-6 ↗
21. Rudraksha S, Gawande S (2021) Effect of process parameters on coefficient of friction in tube hydroforming. J Bio- Tribo-Corros 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-020-00443-x10.1007/s40735-020-00443-x ↗
22. Reddy PV, Reddy BV, Ramulu PJ (2020) Effect of heat treatment temperatures on formability of SS 304 during tube hydroforming process. SN Appl Sci 2(2):205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2026-710.1007/s42452-020-2026-7 ↗
23. Mizumura M, Kuriyama Y (2020) Effect of bending method on tube hydroforming. Mater Trans 61(3):515–521. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.P-M201986610.2320/matertrans.P-M2019866 ↗
24. Zhou H, Zhang S, Qiu L, Wang Z (2021) Springback angle prediction of circular metal tube considering the interference of cross-sectional distortion in mandrel-less rotary draw bending. Sci Prog 104(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/003685042098430310.1177/0036850420984303 ↗
25. Galdos L, Trinidad J, Otegi N, Garcia C (2022) Friction modelling for tube hydroforming processes—a numerical and experimental study with different viscosity lubricants. Materials 15(16):5655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1516565510.3390/ma15165655 ↗