journal article·2024-07Open access

The Comparison between Additively Manufactured and Molded 3D Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Tijana Kavrakova, Luciano Vidal, Jean-Yves Hascoet

Abstract

International audience ; Blood vessels are essential as they transport oxygen and nutrients. To address the increasing mortality rate from cardiovascular diseases, modern science is focusing on clinical trials for replacing human blood vessels with artificial ones. However, the challenge lies in replicating the intricate anatomy with exact dimensional accuracy on a small scale. This work concentrates on developing innovative fabrication solutions in tissue engineering 3D scaffolds. The study captured two prototypes; one based on traditional manufacturing and the other applied an additive manufacturing principle. Once single-layered construct were manufactured, the results were evaluated in terms of dimensional accuracy measuring the constructs’ length, diameter and thickness. Additional tests were performed for finding the strain at break by applying manual strain-induced method. The samples demonstrated that molding excelled in terms of precision however, the mechanical performance did not meet the ISO 7198 standard. Additive manufacturing approach on the other hand, fully satisfied the structural criteria yet the obtained thickness significantly varied from the given one. Furthermore, efforts were made for fabricating three-layered scaffolds and while AM approach brought preferable results, difficulties were faced with molding. Thus, the importance of this work lies in demonstrating the process capabilities of two methods. The results indicate that while AM is suitable for fabricating multilayered constructs with good structural integrity, molding appears promising for small diameter scaffolds, as it can reduce the anatomical mismatches. Therefore, future work will focus on improving the limitations of these methods for developing three-layered vascular grafts within the admissible dimensional and mechanical criteria.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Anatomy and Medical Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. British Heart Foundation (2023) Global heart & circulatory diseases factsheet
2. Muthiah V, George AM, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA (2022) The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.00510.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.005 ↗
3. World Health Organization (WH0) (2021) Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int
4. Saptarshi B, Patrick M (2016) Sydney ringer: the pipe water of new river water company and the discovery of the elixir of life. American College of Surgeons
5. Hu K, Li Y, Ke Z, Yang H, Lu C, Li Y, Guo Y, Wang W (2022) History, progress and future challenges of artificial blood vessels: a narrative review. Biomater Transl. https://doi.org/10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.00810.12336/biomatertransl.2022.01.008 ↗
6. Bom S, Ribeiro R, Riberio HM, Sanots C, Marto J (2022) On the progress of hydrogel-based 3D printing: correlating rheological properties with printing behavior. Int J Pharm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.12150610.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121506 ↗
7. Naghieh S, Sarker MD, Sharma NK, Barhoumi Z, Chen X (2020) Printability of 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds: influence of hydrogel composition and printing parameters. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1001029210.3390/app10010292 ↗
8. Kang KH, Hockaday LA, Butcher JT (2012) Quantitative optimization of solid freeform deposition of aqueous hydrogel. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/03500110.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035001 ↗
9. Kokol V, Pottathara YB, Mihelčič M, Perše LS (2021) Rheological properties of gelatin hydrogels affected by flow-and- horizontally-induced cooling rates during 3D cryo-printing. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12635610.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126356 ↗
10. Soltan N, Ning L, Mohabatpour F, Papagerakis P, Chen X (2019) Printability and cell viability in bioprinting alginate dialdehyde-gelatin scaffolds. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0016710.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00167 ↗
11. Xu L, Varkey M, Jorgensen A, Ju J, Jin Q, Park JH, Fu Y, Zhang G, Ke D, Zhao W, Hou R, Atala H (2020) Bioprinting small diameter blood vessel constructs with an endothelial and smooth muscle cell bilayer in single step. Int Soc Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba2b610.1088/1758-5090/aba2b6 ↗
12. Gao Q, He Y, Fu JZ, Liu A, Ma L (2015) Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with build-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.03110.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.031 ↗
13. Hann SY, Cui H, Chen G, Boehm M, Esworthy T, Zhang LG (2022) 3D printed biomimetic flexible blood vessel with iPS cell-laden hierarchial multilayers. Biomed Eng Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2022.10006510.1016/j.bea.2022.100065 ↗
14. Highley CB, Rodell CB, Burdick JA (2015) Direct 3D printing of shear-thinning hydrogels into self-healing hydrogels. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20150123410.1002/adma.201501234 ↗
15. Bhattacharjee T, Zehnder SM, Rowe KG, Jain S, Nixon RM, Sawyer WG, Angelini TE (2015) Writing in the granular gel medium. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150065510.1126/sciadv.1500655 ↗
16. Hinton TJ, Jallerat Q, Palchesko RN, Park JH, Grodzicki MS, Shue HJ, Ramadan MH, Hudson AR, Feinberg AW (2015) Three-dimensional printing of complex biological structures by freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.150075810.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
17. Christensen K, Xu C, Chai W, Zhang Z, Fu J, Huang Y (2015) Freeform inkjet printing of cellular structures with bifurcations. Biotechnol Bioeng. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.2550110.1002/bit.25501 ↗
18. Wu PK, Ringeisen BR (2009) Development of human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and human umbilical vein smooth muscle cell (HUVSCM) branch/stem structure on hydrpgel layers via biological laser printing. Biofabrication. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/2/1/01411110.1088/1758-5082/2/1/014111 ↗
19. Sodian R, Fu P, Lueders C, Szymanski D, Fritsche C, Gutberlet M, Hoerstrup SP, Hausmann H, Lueth T, Hetzer R (2005) Tissue engineering of vascular conduits: fabrication of custom-made scaffolds using rapid prototyping techniques. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-83753610.1055/s-2005-837536 ↗
20. Zhou L, Li Y, Tu Q, Wang J (2023) A 3D printing mold method for rapid fabrication of artificial blood vessel. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.13095210.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.130952 ↗
21. Wang X, Ao Q, Tian X, Fan J, Tong H, Hou W, Bai S (2017) Gelatin-based hydrogels for organ 3D bioprinting. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym909040110.3390/polym9090401 ↗
22. Ahmady A, Samah NH (2021) A review: gelatine as a bioadhesive material for medical and pharmaceutical applications. Int J Pharm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.12103710.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.121037 ↗
23. Benedict (2016) Monkeys undergo successful 3D printed blood vessel transplant in major stem cell biotech breakthrough. https://www.3ders.org
24. Vidal L, Hascoet N, Kavrakova T, Garcia AJ, Chinesta F, Hascoet JY (2022) Machine learning-based predictive model for printability and shape fidelity in biofabrication. In Tissue engineering part A 28:226–226