A simple microstructural viscoelastic model for flowing foams
Source abstract
Abstract
The numerical modelling of forming processes involving the flow of foams requires taking into account the different problem scales. Thus, in industrial applications a macroscopic approach is suitable, whereas the macroscopic flow parameters depend on the cellular structure: cell size, shape, orientation, etc. Moreover, the shape and orientation of the cells are induced by the flow. A fully microscopic description remains useful to understand the foam behaviour and the topological changes induced by the cell elongation or distortion, however, from an industrial point of view, microscopic simulations remain challenging to address practical applications involving flows in complex 3D geometries. In this paper, we propose a viscoelastic flow model where the foam microstructure is represented from suitable microstructure descriptors whose evolution is governed by the macroscopic flow kinematics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Benito S, Bruneau C-H, Colin T, Gay C, Molino F (2008) An elasto-visco-plastic model for immortal foams or emulsions. Eur Phys J E 25:225–25110.1140/epje/i2007-10284-2 ↗
2. Bikard J, Bruchon J, Coupez T, Vergnes B (2005) Numerical prediction of the foam structure of polymeric materials by direct 3D simulation of their expansion by chemical reaction based on a multidomain method. J Mater Sci 40/22:5875–588110.1007/s10853-005-5022-9 ↗
3. Binetruy C, Chinesta F, Keunings R (2015) F Flows in Polymers, Reinforced Polymers and Composites. A multiscale approach. Springer, Springerbriefs10.1007/978-3-319-16757-2 ↗
4. Cheddadi I, Saramito P, Raufaste C, Marmottant P, Graner F (2008) Numerical modelling of foam Couette flows. Eur Phys J E 27(/2):123–13310.1140/epje/i2008-10358-7 ↗
5. Chinesta F (2013) From single-scale to two-scales kinetic theory descriptions of rods suspensions. Arch Comput Meth Eng 20/1:1–2910.1007/s11831-013-9079-3 ↗
6. Cohen-Addad S, Hohler R, Pitois O (2013) Flow in foams and flowing foams. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 45:241–26710.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140634 ↗
7. Feyel F (2003) A multilevel finite element method (FE2) To describe the response of highly non-linear structures using generalized continua. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 192/28:3233–324410.1016/S0045-7825(03)00348-7 ↗
8. Halin P, Lielens G, Keunings R, Legat V (1998) The Lagrangian particle method for macroscopic and micro-macro viscoelastic flow computations. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 79:387–40310.1016/S0377-0257(98)00123-2 ↗
9. Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc London A102:161–17910.1098/rspa.1922.0078 ↗
10. Karimi M, Droghetti H, Marchisio DL (2017) PUFOam: a novel open-source CFD solver for the simulation of polyurethane foams. Comput Phys Commun 217:138–14810.1016/j.cpc.2017.03.010 ↗
11. Keunings R (2004) Micro-macro methods for the multiscale simulation viscoelastic flow using molecular models of kinetic theory. In: Binding DM, Walters K (eds) Rheology reviews. British Society of Rheology, Aberystwyth, pp 67–98
12. Lamari H, Ammar A, Cartraud P, Legrain G, Jacquemin F, Chinesta F (2010) Routes for efficient computational homogenization of nonlinear materials using the Proper Generalized Decomposition. Arch Comput Meth Eng 17/4:373–39110.1007/s11831-010-9051-4 ↗
13. Tlili S, Gay C, Graner F, Marcq P, Molino F, Saramito P (2015) Mechanical formalisms for tissue dynamics. Eur Phys J E 38:33–6310.1140/epje/i2015-15033-4 ↗