Sensitivity analysis of the expansion process for alloy UNS N08028
Source abstract
Abstract
Due to the good mechanical properties of forged parts, the forging process plays a decisive role in the manufacturing of seamless stainless steel pipes for oil country tubular goods (OCTG) lines. Tough competition between manufacturers gives them plenty of incentive to make their processes in raw material and energy usage more and more efficient. In this context the expansion process is one of the critical production steps in the manufacturing of seamless stainless steel pipes. This work presents a sensitivity analysis of a finite element method (FEM) for the simulation of the expansion of the alloy UNS N08028. The input parameters ram speed, tool angle, initial ID and final ID of the billet as well as temperature were used to describe responses like tool wear and material loss. With the aim to minimize the tool wear and to reduce the material waste, a study of influence of the input parameters on the mentioned responses were performed. This development is supported by experimental work in order to validate the simulation model. The sector demand for new materials with specific properties and the cost-intensive experimental trials justifies the use of such simulation tools and opens great opportunities for the industry.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Brensing KH, Sommer B (2009) Steel tube and pipe manufacturing processes, Res. Dpt., Salzgitter Mannesmann Röhrenwerke Gmb H, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany
2. Hansson S (2009) Modeling of the stainless steel tube extrusion process, Ph.D. diss., Dpt. of Appl. Ph. of Mech. Eng., Luleå Univ. of Tech., Luleå, Sweeden
3. Marie S et al. (2014) Inverse analysis of forming processes based on FORGE® environment. Transvalor. ESAFORM10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.1494 ↗
4. Fanini S (2008) Modelling of the Mannesmann effect in tube piercing, Ph.D. diss., Dpt. of Mech. Inn. and Mgmt., Univ. of Padova, Padova, Italy
5. Sejournet J, Delcroix J (1995) Glass lubrication in the extrusion of steel. Lubr Eng 11:389–396
6. Liu C, Zhang L, Kang F (2013) Experimental study on heat transfer boundary conditions for steel hot extrusion process. Adv M Res 668:856–860. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.668.85610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.668.856 ↗
7. Dieter GE, Kuhn HA, Semiatin SL (2003) Handbook of workability and process Design, ASM Inter., Mat. Park, Ohio
8. Cockroft MG, Latham DJ (1996) Ductility and the workability of metals. Int J Instr Media 96:33–39
9. Wang H et al (2017) Global sensitivity analysis for fiber reinforced composite fiber path based on D-MORPH-HDMR algorithm. Struct Multidiscip Optim:1–1610.1007/s00158-017-1681-9 ↗
10. Xue X et al (2016) Modelling and sensitivity analysis of twist springback in deep drawing of dual-phase steel. Mater Des 90:204–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.12710.1016/j.matdes.2015.10.127 ↗
11. Eriksson L, Johansson E, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wikstrom CA, Wold S (2008) Design of experiments- principles and applications. Umetrics AB