journal article·2020-07

Assessment of steam forming performance of aluminum sheet metal based on experimental studies

Salah Aissa, Rezgui Mohamed Ali, Ayadi Mahfoudh

Publisher page

Abstract

This work presents an experimental study of aluminum sheet forming. It shows the performances of a steam hydroforming process. The new forming technique is based on both temperature and pressure to make a sheet form. These parameters are linked to the water vaporization process into a cavity covered by the blank. The performances are deduced by comparing the results obtained from the steam tests with those acquired at room temperature. Performances are expressed in terms of forming loads, surface creation, and forming limits. The experimental results show that the use of the steam temperature as a factor could decrease the limit loads necessary for the forming operation and increase the surface creation. On top of improving forming loads and surface creation, increasing steam temperature induces a clear improvement of forming limits.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state of the art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00302-710.1016/S0924-0136(99)00302-7 ↗
2. Bihamta R, D’Amours G, Bui Q-H, Guillot M, Raham A, Fafard M (2013) Numerical and experimental studies on the new design concept of hydroforming dies for complex tubes. Mater Des 47:766–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.07510.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.075 ↗
3. Vasile C, Sorin G (2018) Determination of the force required for the hydroforming of al 99,5.MATEC web of conferences 244, 01003 ITEP’18, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20182440100310.1051/matecconf/201824401003 ↗
4. Lang LH, Wang ZR, Kang DC, Yuan SJ, Zhang SH, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Hydro- forming highlights: sheet hydro forming and tube hydro forming. J Mater Process Technol 151:165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.03210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032 ↗
5. Ch H (2005) Research and advances in fundamentals and industrial application of hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 167(4):383–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440541454846310.1177/0954405414548463 ↗
6. Zhang SH, Zong-Ren Wang YX, Wang ZT, Zhou LX (2004) Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 151(1–3):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.05410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.054 ↗
7. Zhubin H, Shijian Y, Gang L, Jia W, Weiwei C (2010) Formability testing of AZ31B magnesium alloy tube at elevated temperature. J Mater Process Technol 210:877–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.01.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.01.020 ↗
8. Mahfoudh A, Cherouat A, Slimani F, Mohamed-Ali R, Ali Z (2011) Experimental and numerical modeling of thermo-forming of anisotropic thin sheet. Appl Mech Mater 62:37–48. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.62.3710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.62.37 ↗
9. Yuan S, Qi J, He Z (2006) An experimental investigation into the formability of hydroforming 5A02 Al-tubes at elevated temperature. J Mater Process Technol 177(1-3):680–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.04.04410.1016/j.jmatprotec.04.044 ↗
10. Sasawat M, Muammer K (2010) Materiel behavior and formability of magnesium AZ31 sheet under hydroforming conditions. Mater forum 34:105–109
11. Grüner M, Gnibl T, Merklein M (2014) Blank hydroforming using granular material as medium-investigations on leakage. Procedia Eng 81:1035–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.13710.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.137 ↗
12. Maeno T, Mori KI, Unou C (2014) Improvement of die filling by prevention of temperature drop in gas forming of aluminium alloy tube using air filled into sealed tube and resistance heating. Procedia Eng 81:2237–2242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.31410.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.314 ↗
13. Siegert K, Jäger S, Vulcan M (2003) Pneumatic bulging of magnesium AZ31 sheet metals at elevated temperatures. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):241–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60575-710.1016/S0007-8506(07)60575-7 ↗
14. Nassar H, Albakri M, Pan H, Khraisheh M (2012) On the gas pressure forming of aluminium foam sandwich panels; experiments and numerical simulations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.11610.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.116 ↗
15. Siegert K, Jaeger S (2004) Pneumatic bulging of magnesium AZ31 sheet metal at elevated temperatures. The Minerals Metals & Materials Society:87–90
16. Salah A, Soula M, Lazgueb T (2017) Experimental study of steam hydroforming of aluminum sheet metal. Exp Techniquesdoi 41(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-017-0191-410.1007/s40799-017-0191-4 ↗
17. Siegert K, Wagner S (1994) Formability characteristics of Aluminium sheet. European Aluminium Association
18. Slimani F (2008) Approche expérimental pour la construction et la prédiction des courbes limites de formage des tôles. Diplôme de master, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie de Sousse
19. dos Santos Rodrigues LC (2015) Constitutive parameters identification of metal sheets using circular bulge tests. University of Coimbra, PhD thesis
20. Choung JM, Cho SR (2008) Study on true stress correction from tensile tests. J Mech Sci Technol 22(6):1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-0302-310.1007/s12206-008-0302-3 ↗