Enhanced finite element formulations on the numerical simulation of tailor-welded hydroformed products
Source abstract
Abstract
This work aims to assess the influence of different finite element formulations in the performance and quality of solution obtained by numerical simulation in the analysis of tailor-welded hydroformed tubular parts. Tube hydroforming represents a cost effective forming process for high-strength, low weight products on, as an example, automotive and airspace applications. On the other side, the use of tailor-welding in order to obtain custom-made combinations of thicknesses and materials - leading to a wide variety of user-defined products - can be introduced into conventional tubular hydroforming processes in order to further improve the applicability range of the later process. The main goal of the present work is to describe the state-of-the-art in the field, focusing on distinct finite element formulations and providing guidelines for the simulation of tubular hydroforming process combined with tailor-welded joining techniques. Hexahedral solid and solid-shell enhanced assumed strain elements, either with reduced and full numerical integration procedures, are analyzed in order to infer about the potentialities of the combined forming technology. Material characterization of the heat affected zone is included and the influence of finite element modeling on defects onset and prediction during forming is considered.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Elasticity and Material Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmetoglu M, Sutter K, Li XJ, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: current research, applications and need for training. J Mater Process Technol 98:224–23110.1016/S0924-0136(99)00203-4 ↗
2. Gélin JC, Laberge C (2004) Application of optimal design and control strategies to the hydroforming of thin walled metallic tubes. Int J Forming Process 98:141–15810.3166/ijfp.7.141-158 ↗
3. Jirathearanat S, Altan T (2004) Optimization of loading paths for tube hydroforming. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Numer. Methods Industrial Forming Processes (NUMIFORM’2004). Ohio, USA.10.1063/1.1766683 ↗
4. Dohmann F, Hartl C (1996) Hydroforming - a method to manufacture light-weight parts. J Mater Process Technol 60:669–67610.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-X ↗
5. Koç M, Aue-U-Lan Y, Altan T (2001) On the characteristics of tubular materials for hydroforming—experimentation and analysis. Int J Mach Tools and Manufacture 41(5):761–77210.1016/S0890-6955(00)00070-5 ↗
6. Kim S, Kim Y (2002) Analytical study for tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 128(1–3):232–23910.1016/S0924-0136(02)00456-9 ↗
7. Natal Jorge RM, Roque AP, Valente RAF, Parente MPL, Fernandes AA (2007) Study of hydroformed tailor-welded tubular parts with dissimilar thickness. J Mater Process Technol 184:363–37110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.002 ↗
8. Natal Jorge RM, Valente RAF, Roque AP, Parente MPL, Fernandes AA (2007) Numerical simulation of hydroforming process involving a tubular blank with dissimilar thickness. Mater Manuf Process 22:286–29110.1080/10426910601134195 ↗
9. Valente RAF, Natal Jorge RM, Roque AP, Parente MPL, Fernandes AA (2008) Simulation of dissimilar tailor-welded tubular hydroforming processes using EAS-based solid finite elements. Int J Adv Manuf Eng 37(7–8):689–670
10. Tailor Welded Blank Project Team (2001) Tailor welded blank application and manufacturing - A state-of-the-art survey. The Auto/Steel Partnership
11. Zhao KM, Chun BK, Lee JK (2001) Finite element analysis of tailor-welded blanks. Finite Elem Anal Des 37(2):117–13010.1016/S0168-874X(00)00026-3 ↗
12. ABAQUS (2002) Theory manual, version 6.3. hibbitt. Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc, Rhode-Island, USA
13. Harnau M, Schweizerhof K (2002) About linear and quadratic “Solid-Shell” elements at large deformations. Comput Struct 80(9–10):805–81710.1016/S0045-7949(02)00048-2 ↗
14. Alves RJ, de Sousa RM, Natal Jorge RAF, Valente JMA, de Sá C (2003) A new volumetric and shear locking-free 3D enhanced strain element. Eng Computations 20:896–92510.1108/02644400310502036 ↗
15. Valente RAF, Alves de Sousa RJ, Natal Jorge RM (2004) Solid-shell elements with enhanced strains for elasto-plastic, large rotations and large deformation problems. Computational Mechanics 34:38–52
16. Alves de Sousa RJ, Cardoso RPR, Valente RAF, Yoon JW, Natal Jorge RM, Grácio JJ (2005) A new one-point quadrature EAS solid- shell element accounting for multi-points along thickness - Part I: Geometrically linear problems. Int J Numer Meth Eng 62:952–97710.1002/nme.1226 ↗
17. Alves de Sousa RJ, Cardoso RPR, Valente RAF, Yoon JW, Natal Jorge RM, Grácio JJ (2006) A new one-point quadrature EAS solid- shell element accounting for multi-points along thickness - Part II: Non-linear applications. Int J Numer Meth Eng 67:160–18810.1002/nme.1609 ↗
18. Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Meth Eng 29:1595–163810.1002/nme.1620290802 ↗
19. Simo JC, Armero F (1992) Geometrically non-linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Meth Eng 33:1413–144910.1002/nme.1620330705 ↗
20. Simo JC, Armero F, Taylor RL (1993) Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 110:359–38610.1016/0045-7825(93)90215-J ↗