A topological approach for the flow behaviourcharacterization in LCM processes
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work we propose a topological approach to explain the dynamical behaviour of a LCM flow. To this end we shall use a class of homotopy maps in order to characterize an idealized mould filling process. By means this benchmark model we can construct a functional that can be used to give the reference in an on-line control system. In our previous work, [1], is proposed the use of the artificial vision technique to sense the mould as a discretized mesh that can be simulated off-line and used as a benchmark model in real-time control systems. The resulting FEM simulation represents theoretical flow behaviour. In this sense, the ideal flow behaviour must be defined based on the optimal criterion. For instance in [2, 3], the flow front in each time instant is desirable to be vent-oriented for dry spot prevention. Whatever of these optimal laws can be defined as a homotopy map where the flow front is defined as a parametric curve that moves with the flow. In order to reduce the sampling rate control system, the homotopy map is defined in a Flow Pattern Configuration Space (FPCS). This tool permits to represent the mould filling in an alternative space representation developed with the optimal criterion [5–7]. Using this space, the homotopy map is defined as a mono-dimensional parametric function for whatever mould dimension. Some numerical examples are given at the end of the paper.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Montés N, Sánchez F, Tornero J (2008) Numerical technique for the space discretization of resin infusion mould sensing with artificial vision. Int Journal Mat Form Springer/ESAFORM10.1007/s12289-008-0247-1 ↗
2. Sánchez F, García JA, Chinesta F, Gascón Ll, Zhang C, Liang Z, Wang B (2005) A process performance index based on gate-distance and incubation time for the optimization of gate locations in liquid composite molding processes. Compos Part A 37/6:903–912
3. Jiang S, Zhang C, Wang B (2001) A process performance index and its application to optimization of the RTM process. Polym Compos 22(5):690–70110.1002/pc.10571 ↗
4. Ruiz E, Achim V, Soukane S, Trochu F, Bréard J (2006) Optimization of injection flow rate to minimize micro/macro-voids formation in resin transfer molded composites. Compos Sci Technol 66(3–4):475–48610.1016/j.compscitech.2005.06.013 ↗
5. Montés N, Sánchez F (2008) Flow Pattern Configuration Spaces definition for LCM process design. Int Conf on Flow Processes in Comp Mat
6. Montés N, Sánchez F, Falcó A (2008) Flow Pattern Configuration Spaces application for optimization and control of LCM process. Int Conf on Flow Processes in Composite Materials
7. Montés N, Sánchez F. A new computational tool for liquid composite moulding process design based on configuration spaces, Compos Part A, under review
8. Lin M, Murphy M, Hahn H (2000) Resin transfer molding process optimization. Compos Part A 31(4):361–37110.1016/S1359-835X(99)00054-8 ↗
9. Gokce A, Hsiao K, Advani S (2002) branch and bound search to optimize injection gate locations in liquid composite molding processes. Compos Part A 33(9):1263–127210.1016/S1359-835X(02)00047-7 ↗
10. Gokce A, Advani S (2004) Vent location optimization using map-based exhaustive search in liquid composite molding processes material manufacturing process 19(3):523–54810.1081/AMP-120038659 ↗
11. Mogarevo J, Sun J, Advani S (1997) A nonlinear control method for resin transfer molding. Polymer composites 18(3):412–41710.1002/pc.10292 ↗
12. Bickerton S, Stadefld H, Steiner K, Advani S (2001) Design and application of actively controlled injection schemes for resin-transfer molding. Compos sci tech 61(11):1625–163710.1016/S0266-3538(01)00064-1 ↗
13. Lawrence J, Hsiao K, Don R, Simacek P, Estrada G, Sozer M et al (2002) An approach to couple mould design and on-line control to manufacture complex composite parts by resin transfer molding. Compos Part A 33(7):981–99010.1016/S1359-835X(02)00043-X ↗
14. Lee C, Rice B, Buczek M, Mason D (1998) Resin transfer molding process monitoring and control. In proc. of international sampe symp and exhibition 43(1):231–242
15. Nielsen D, Pitchumani R (2001) intelligent model-based control of preform permeation in liquid composite molding process, with on-line optimization. Compos Part A 32(12):1789–180310.1016/S1359-835X(01)00013-6 ↗
16. Heider D, Graf A, Fink BK, Gillespie JW Jr (1999) Feedback control of the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (vartm) process. In proceedings of SPIE 3589:133–14110.1117/12.339956 ↗
17. Heider D, Epple S, Gillespie JW Jr (2001) Flow rate control during vacuum-assiste resin transfer molding (vartm) processing. In Proc of SAMPE 46(i):1061–1071
18. Nalla AR, Fuqua M, Glancey J, Lelievre B (2007) A multi-segment injection line and real-time adaptative, model-based controller for vacuum assisted resin transfer moulding. Comp Part A 38:1058–106910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.021 ↗
19. Modi D, Correia N, Johnson M, Long A, Rudd C, Robitaille F (2007) active control of the vacuum infusion process. Comp Part A 38:1271–128710.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.012 ↗
20. Jiang S, Zhang C, Wang B (2002) Optimum arrangement of gate and vent locations for RTM process design using a mesh distance-based approach. Compos Part A 33:471–48110.1016/S1359-835X(01)00146-4 ↗
21. Kessels JFA, Jonker AS, Akkerman R (2007) Optimising the flow pipe arrangement for resin infusion under flexible tooling. Compos Part A 38:2076–208510.1016/j.compositesa.2007.04.008 ↗