An improvement of flow front computation through Bézier shape deformation guaranteeing mass conservation law
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper aims to define the flow front as a continuous curve, in particular a Bezier curve, to reduce the inaccuracies generated by classical Finite Elements (FEM) in the flow front definition. The flow front is used in LCM processes for optimization algorithms, on-line control systems, PPI index and in general for whatever design and correction task. In these algorithms it is commonly used FEM simulation where the flow front is represented as a set of discrete points. This fact introduces an inaccuracy with the real flow front, because is continuous. In addition, the shape of the flow front obtained by FEM simulation differs in a great manner from the smooth shape of the real flow front. This concept was solved in our previous research, [7], where, using a mathematical technique, a Bezier curve is deformed and moved using velocity vectors. This technique is called Bezier Shape Deformation. This work improved the flow front representation but also introduced inaccuracies. In particular, the area enclosed between two Bezier curves, the flow front in different time instants, do not corresponds to the resins amount introduced in this range of time. To solve it, in the present research it is guaranteed the mass conservation law. Hence, it is introduced the required enclosed area in the mathematical technique to guarantee that not only velocity vectors has an influence in the Bezier curve deformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques · Advanced Vision and Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (8)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Cockburn. Discontinuous Galerking methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol.3 (Fluids) Encyclopedia of computational mechanics, ch 4. John Wiley & Sons, 2004.10.1002/0470091355.ecm053 ↗
2. F. Bassi, S. Rebay. High order accurate discontinuous finite element solution of the 2D Euler equations. Int. Journal Comput. Phys., vol 138, no 2, pp 251–285, 1997.10.1006/jcph.1997.5454 ↗
3. D. Xue, L. Demkowicz. Control of geometry induced error in hp finite element (FE) simulations. I. Evaluation of FE error for curvilinear geometries. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Model., vol.2, no 3, pp 283–300, 2005.
4. T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell, Y. Bazilevs. Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Computational methods applied Mechanical Engineering, vol 194, no 39–41, pp 4135–4195, 2005.10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.008 ↗
5. R. Sevilla, S. Fernández-Méndez, A. Huerta. Nurbs-Enhanced Finite Element Method. International Journal for numerical methods in engineering Vol 00; pp 1–6, 2007.
6. David E. Cardoze, Gary L. Miller, Mark Olah, Todd Phillips. A Bézier-Based Moving Mesh Framework for Simulation with Elastic Membranes.2004.
7. N. Montés, F. Sánchez, L. Hilario, A. Falcó. Flow Numerical Computation through Bézier Shape Deformation for LCM process simulation methods. International Journal of material forming, (ESAFORM) 2008. Vol. 1 pp 919–922. Lyon (France).10.1007/s12289-008-0246-2 ↗
8. Maureen C. Stone, Xerox Parc, Toni D. DeRose. A geometric characterization of parametric cubic curves. University of Washington.