Modelling the optimum hot workability of TiB reinforced Ti-6Al-4 V alloy by stability maps
Source abstract
Abstract
Hot workability of Ti-6%Al-4%V and two whisker discontinuously reinforced materials, Ti-6%Al-4%V/1.2%TiB and Ti-6%Al-4%V/8.9%TiB, have been investigated. Hot uniaxial compression tests were carried out using a computer controlled thermomechanical simulator Gleeble machine at temperatures in the range 850 °C to 950 °C and strain rates ranging from 1 to 50 s−1. The microstructures and the compression test results were compared among the three materials. The Ti-6%Al-4%V/8.9%TiB material presented extensive cracking after deformation. In contrast, the Ti-6%Al-4%V/1.2%TiB material showed an interesting compromise between flow stress and workability. The parameters of the Garofalo equation were calculated for the three materials revealing apparent activation energies that increased with increasing TiB content. The modelling is carried out by stability maps that gives the temperature at a given strain rate to obtain optimal workability and the stresses that has to bear the equipment. Taken 5 s−1 as a reference strain rate, the temperature required to obtain a quality product increased from about 1143 K (870 °C) for the Ti-6-4 alloy without TiB to 1228 K (955 °C) for the 1.2%TiB and to 1283 K (1010 °C) for the 8.9%TiB material. Therefore, the production of parts of the TiB composites should be conducted at a higher forming temperature to avoid the presence of cracks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Boyer R, Welsch G, EW C (eds) (1994) Materials Properties Handbook: titanium alloys. ASM International, Materials Park, OH
2. Mall S, Nicholas T (eds) (1998) Titanium Matrix Composites: Mechanical behaviour. Technomic Pub Company, Lancaster
3. Sahay SS, Ravichandran KS, Atri R, Chen B, Rubin J (1999) Evolution of microstructure and phases in in situ processed Ti–TiB composites containing high volume fractions of TiB whiskers. J. Mater Res 14:4214–422310.1557/JMR.1999.0571 ↗
4. Soboyejo WO, Lederich RJ, Sastry SML (1994) Mechanical behavior of damage tolerant TiB whisker-reinforced in situ titanium matrix composites. Acta Metall Mater 42:2579–259110.1016/0956-7151(94)90199-6 ↗
5. García de Cortázar M, Agote I, Silveira E, Egizabal P, Coleto J, Le Petitcorps Y (2008) Titanium composite materials for transportation applications. JOM 60:40–4610.1007/s11837-008-0146-4 ↗
6. Zhang X, Lu W, Wu R (1999) In-situ technique for synthesizing (TiB + TiC)/TiC composites. Scr Mater 41:39–4610.1016/S1359-6462(99)00087-1 ↗
7. Warchomicka F, Poletti C, Stockinger M (2010) Microstructure evolution during hot deformation of Ti-6Al-4 V double cone specimens. Int J Mater Form 3:215–22110.1007/s12289-010-0745-9 ↗
8. Sahebdel L, Abbasi SM, Momeni A (2011) Microstructural evolution through hot working of the single-phase and two-phase Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Int J Mater Res 102:41–4710.3139/146.110455 ↗
9. Bruschi S, Poggio S, Quadrini F, Tata ME (2004) Workability of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy at high temperatures and strain rates. Mater Lett 58:3622–362910.1016/j.matlet.2004.06.058 ↗
10. Park N-K, Yeom J-T, Na Y-S (2002) Characterization of deformation stability in hot forging of conventional Ti–6Al–4 V using processing maps. J Mater Process Technol 130-131:540–54510.1016/S0924-0136(02)00801-4 ↗
11. Momeni A, Abbasi SM (2010) Effect of hot working on flow behavior of Ti–6Al–4 V alloy in single phase and two phase regions. Mater Des 31:3599–360410.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.060 ↗
12. Seshacharyulu T, Medeiros SC, Frazier WG, Prasad YVRK (2010) Hot working of commercial Ti–6Al–4 V with an equiaxed α/β microstructure: materials modeling considerations. Mater Sci Eng A 284:184–19410.1016/S0921-5093(00)00741-3 ↗
13. Weertman J (1968) Dislocation climb theory of steady-state creep. Trans ASM 61:681–694
14. Frost HJ, Ashby MF (1982) Deformation mechanism maps. Pergamon Press, Oxford
15. Prasad YVRK, Gegel HL, Doraivelu SM, Malas JC, Morgan JT, Lark KA, Barker DR (1984) Modeling of dynamic material behavior in hot deformation: forging of Ti-6242. Metall Trans A 15:1883–189210.1007/BF02664902 ↗
16. Prasad YVRK (1996) Dynamic materials model: basis and principles. Metall Mater Trans A 27:235–23610.1007/BF02647765 ↗
17. Carsí M, Peñalba F, Rieiro I, Zapiráin F, Ruano OA (2000) Hot forging of a Cu-Al-Ni-Fe-Mn alloy and its simulation by torsion testing. Z Metallkd 91:1057–1062
18. Rieiro I, Carsí M, Ruano OA (2009) New numerical method for the fit of garofalo equation and its application for predicting hot workability of a (V-N) microalloyed steel. Mater Sci Technol 25:995–100210.1179/174328408X369429 ↗
19. Garcia de Cortázar M (2006) Development of a new reinforced titanium alloy: Basic research and technological transfer for the Ti-6Al-4 V/TiB material (PhD Thesis). University of Bordeaux, France
20. Okasaki Y (2012) On the effects of hot forging and hot rolling on the microstructural development and mechanical response of a biocompatible Ti alloy. Materials 5:1439–146110.3390/ma5081439 ↗
21. Garofalo F (1965) Fundamentals of creep and creep rupture in metals. McMillan, New York
22. Rieiro I, Ruano OA, Eddahbi M, Carsí M (1998) Integral method from initial values to obtain the best fit of the Garofalo’s creep equation. J Mater Process Technol 78:177–18310.1016/S0924-0136(97)00481-0 ↗
23. Botes DM, Watts DG (1986) Non-linear regression analysis and its applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York
24. Balasundar I, Raghu T, Kashyap BP (2015) Processing map for a cast and homogenized near alpha titanium alloy. Int J Mater Form 8:85–9710.1007/s12289-013-1150-y ↗
25. Lasalle J, Solomon L (1961) Stability by Liapunov's direct method. Academic Press, New York
26. Beltrami EJ (ed) (1987) Mathematics for Dynamic Modeling. Academic Press, Boston