Development of innovative systems based on smart fluids technology for the improvement of the dimensional accuracy in sheet metal forming operations
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic behaviour and the stiffness are critical requirements in high-tech forming machine sector. High performances, in terms of repeatability and dimensional accuracy, are obtained by increasing the structural stiffness and the mass of machines, though this can determine rapid and excessive deterioration of tools due to wear. Furthermore, in sheet metal blanking processes, the machines are subjected to severe vibrations that can significantly reduce their service life. On these bases, the use of SMART devices applied to metal forming machines can represent the ideal solution for the closed-loop control of dynamic phenomena. The paper presents an innovative concept for the vibration control occurring in blanking operations, based on the implementation of magnetorheological (MR) fluids. A new approach based on a multi-physics optimization analysis is presented which proves to be suitable to investigate the mutual metal-MR fluid interactions and to provide a reliable tool for the design and optimization when different physic fields are involved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Wagener HW (1997) New development in sheet metal forming: sheet materials, tools and machinery. J Mater Process Technol 72(3):342–35710.1016/S0924-0136(97)00193-3 ↗
2. Wonsetler R, White M. The use of hydraulic shock dampers to arrest the reverse load of blanking in presses. W-Technologies, Mt. Carmel, IL
3. Browne DJ, Battikha E (1995) Optimisation of aluminium sheet forming using a flexible die. J Mater Process Technol 55(3–4):218–22310.1016/0924-0136(95)02009-8 ↗
4. Yang G, Spencer BF, Carlson JD, Sain M (2002) Large-scale MR fluid dampers: modelling and dyna-mic performance considerations. Engineering Structures 24(3):309–32310.1016/S0141-0296(01)00097-9 ↗
5. Bica I (2006) The influence of the magnetic field on the electrical magnetoresistance of magnetorheological suspensions. J Magn Magn Mater 299(2):412–41810.1016/j.jmmm.2005.04.027 ↗
6. Lee U, Kim D, Hur N, Leon D (1999) Design analysis and experimental evaluation of an MR fluids clutch. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 10(9):701–70710.1106/EX6X-Y4QQ-XQ5L-8JJV ↗
7. Fujitani H, Sodeyama H, Hata K, Komatsu Y, Iwata N, Sunakoda K, Soda S (2000) Dynamic performance evaluation of 200 kN Magneto-Rh Damper, SPIE’s 7th Annual International Symposium, Vol. 3989, pages. 194–203
8. Zipser L, Richte L, Lange U (2001) Magnetorheologic fluids for actuators. Sens Actuators, A 92(1–3, 1):318–32510.1016/S0924-4247(01)00590-8 ↗
9. Jha R, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1019–102910.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.007 ↗
10. Carson JD, Mathis W, Toscano JR (2001) Smart prosthetics based on magnetorheological fluids. SPIE 8th Annual Symposium on Smart Struct10.1117/12.429670 ↗
11. Regazzo P (2007) Internal report in Italian, Dimeg
12. David E (1993) Steward, Zbigniew Leyk, ANSYS 10.0 Documentation. Meschach Library Copyright