journal article·2010-04

A large-deformation multiplicative framework for anisotropic elastoplastic materialswith application to sheet metal forming

I. N. Vladimirov, M. Schwarze, M. P. Pietryga, J. Frischkorn, S. Reese

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we discuss the derivation and the numerical implementation of a finite strain material model for plastic anisotropy and nonlinear kinematic and isotropic hardening. The model is derived in a thermodynamic setting and is based on the multiplicative split of the deformation gradient in the context of hyperelasticity. Introducing the socalled structure tensors as additional tensor-valued arguments, plastic anisotropy can bemodelled by representing the yield surface and the plastic flow rule as functions of the structure tensors. The evolution equations are integrated by a recentlydeveloped form of the exponential map that preserves plastic incompressibility and uses the spectral decomposition to evaluate the exponential tensor functions in closed form. The model has been validated based on experimental data and its applicability for earing prediction has been demonstrated by performing simulations of cylindrical cup drawing and comparisons with experiments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Elasticity and Material Modeling · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (9)

Show source-provided references
1. Miehe C, Apel N, Lambrecht M (2002) Anisotropic additive plasticity in the logarithmic strain space: modular kinematic formulation and implementation based on incremental minimization principles for standard materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191:5383–542510.1016/S0045-7825(02)00438-3 ↗
2. Papadopoulos P, Lu J (2001) On the formulation and numerical solution of problems in anisotropic finite plasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190:4889–491010.1016/S0045-7825(00)00355-8 ↗
3. Sansour C, Karsaj I, Soric J (2007) On anisotropic flow rules in multiplicative elastoplasticity at finite strains. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 196:1294–130910.1016/j.cma.2006.09.007 ↗
4. Lion A (2000) Constitutive modelling in finite thermoviscoplasticity: a physical approach based on nonlinear rheological models. International Journal of Plasticity 16:469–49410.1016/S0749-6419(99)00038-8 ↗
5. Hill R (1948) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A193:281–29710.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
6. Vladimirov IN, Pietryga MP, Reese S (2008) On the modelling of non-linear kinematic hardening at finite strains with application to springback - comparison of time integration algorithms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 75:1–2810.1002/nme.2234 ↗
7. Yoon JW, Barlat F, Dick RE, Chung K, Kang TJ (2004) Plane srtress yield function for aluminum alloy sheet: Part ii: Fe formulation and its implementation. International Journal of Plasticity 20:495–52210.1016/S0749-6419(03)00099-8 ↗
8. Rabahallah M, Bouvier S, Balan T, Bacroix B (2009) Numerical simulation of sheet metal forming using anisotropic strain-rate potentials. Materials Science and Engineering A 517:261–27510.1016/j.msea.2009.03.078 ↗
9. Schwarze M, Reese S (2009) A reduced integration solid-shell finite element based on the eas and the ans concept - geometrically linear problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 80:1322–135510.1002/nme.2653 ↗